16-150
Montana Attorney General Opinion 16-150
Length: 822 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 16 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 150
Opinion No. 150.
Motor Vehicles-Chattel Mortgages-
Conditional Sales Contracts -
Satis-
faction, Filing of-Filing Fee.
HELD:
Satisfactions of chattel
mortgages and conditional sales con-
tracts on motor vehicles must be filed
with the Registrar of Motor Vehicles,
and the filing fee of 25¢ each must be
paid by the person filing the satisfac-
tion.
August 9, 1935.
Mr. A. B. Middleton
Registrar of Motor Vehicles
Deer Lodge, Montana
With reference to chattel mort-
gages and conditional sales contracts
covering motor vehicles, you have
submitted the following question:
"Do our statutes require the sat-
isfaction of a conditional sales con-
tract or a chattel mortgage to be ac-
companied by the fee of 25¢?
If
your answer to this question should
be no, we would request you to ad-
vise us in what manner these con-
tracts must be satisfied as it would
seem that there must be a satisfac-
tion of these contracts in order for
our records to be cleared."
Section 2, subdivision 5, Chapter
159, Laws of 1933, provides:
"A
charge of One Dollar ( $1) shall be
made for issuance of original certifi-
cate of ownership, which shall be col-
lected by the County Treasurer the
first time any vehicle is registered by
any owner and remitted to the Re-
gistrar of Motor Vehicles with appli-
cation for registration. Upon trans-
fer of registration by the owner there
shall be paid to the Registrar of Mo-
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
149
tor Vehicles a transfer fee of One
Dollar ($1).
A fee of Twenty-five
Cents (25¢) shall be paid for filing
satisfactions of chattel mortgages or
conditional sales contracts. A fee of
Fifty Cents (50¢) shall be paid the
registrar for filing chattel mortgages,
conditional sales contracts or assign-
ments thereof and also for issuing
certificate to copy of chattel mort-
gages or conditional sales contract."
While this section does not specif-
ically provide that the payment of 25¢
filing fee for filing a satisfaction
shall be paid to the Registrar of Mo-
tor Vehicles, a reasonable and fair
construction would lead to the con-
clusion that the legislature intended
that all fees mentioned in this section
should be paid to the Registrar of
Motor Vehicles.
Section 8289, R. C.
M. 1921, reads: "Whenever the debt
or obligation secured by any mortgage
of personal property, which has been
filed in the office of the county clerk,
as provided in this chapter, shall be
paid or discharged, an acknowledg-
ment of satisfaction, signed by the
mortgagee, his legal representative or
assigns, must be indorsed upon the
mortgage, or copy thereof, or at-
tached thereto, filed as aforesaid, and
the fact of such discharge or satis-
faction noted by th~ county clerk in
the book kept by him, as provided by
this act, opposite the names of the
parties to such mortgage."
Since chattel mortgages and con-
ditional sales contracts covering mo-
tor vehicles by.the provisions of said
Chapter 159 are required to be filed
with the registrar of motor vehicles
and not with the county clerk, said
section 8289 can have no application
to such chattel mortgages and con-
ditional sales contracts. The legisla-
ture, therefore, could not have intend-
ed that such fee bE! paid to the coun-
ty clerk where such mortgages and
contracts are no longer filed. It is
obvious that the legislature intended
that this fee, like all the other fees
mentioned
in
said subdivision
5,
should be paid to the registrar of mo-
tor vehicles.
It is true that there is no provision
in said Chapter 159, or elsewhere,
which requires that this satisfaction
fee shall be paid by the mortgagor or
conditional sales vendor or the as-
signees of either of them. In the ab-
sence of such provision it is my opin-
ion that they cannot be compelled to
pay such fee. All the statute requires
is that tt,e satisfaction shall be ac-
companied by the fee of 25¢. It is
the duty of the registrar to collect
such fee from the person filing the
satisfaction.
By reason of the requirement of the
payment of such filing fee, it is my
opinion that the legisiature intended
that satisfactions of chattel mort-
gages and conditional :;:ales contracts
should be filed. It is true paragraph
(e), subdivision 4, Section 2 of said
Chapter 159 provides that if a condi-
tional sales vendor or assignee or
chattel mortgagee or assignee failed
there is no requirement in the statute
to surrender the certificate of owner-
ship to the owner within· twenty days
after receiving final payment, he
shall be required to pay certain liq-
uidated damages to the owner, but
that the owner must thereupon make
a new application or certificate of
registration which will show the true
status of the title.
Paragraphs (a)
and (b), subdivision 3, Section 2 rd.,
have to do with transfer of title or
interest and are not applicable to
satisfactions.