16-153
Montana Attorney General Opinion 16-153
Length: 716 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 16 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 153
Opinion No. 153.
Highways-Public
Highways-Per-
manent Highways-County Surveyor
-Cities and Towns-Streets
and
Alleys, Improvement of-General
Road Fund-Counties.
HELD: 1. Where a city or town
council lays out or constructs an alley
within the limits of the city or town
it represents, such alley is a public
highway, and may be improved out
of the general road fund of the
county.
2. County surveyor is vested with
authority to act in a supervisory ca-
pacity after the city or town council
has designated a public highway or
street upon which work is to be done,
and the type of pavement to be used
July 5, 1935.
Mr. Jack Healy
County Surveyor, Silver Bow County
Butte, Montana
At your request I have examined
the opinion of Clarence Hanley, depu-
ty county attorney of Silver Bow
County, concerning your powers as
county surveyor in the construction
and oiling of permanent highways and
streets within the City of Butte.
Prior to the passage of Chapter
107, Laws of 1923, not Chapter 103,
Laws of 1933, fifty per cent of the
net fees for registration of motor ve-
hicles was paid to the particular
county from which the registration
fees came in the first instance and
was credited to its general road fund.
Under the provisions of Chapter 107
all of the net fees was paid to the
particular county from which the reg-
istration fees came in the first in-
stance and was credited to its general
road fund. The general road fund
was used for the construction, mainte-
nance, improvement and repair of
highways in the county outside cities
152
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
and towns. Under the provisions of
Chapter 88, Laws of 1927, which
amended Chapter 107, all of the nel
fees was paid to the county and was
required to be used by it for the con-
struction, repair and maintenance not
only of highways outside cities and
towns but of streets in Citil'S within
the bOllf'.dllries of the county where
such str.::ets formed component parts
of arterial highways.
Section 5039, Revised Codes of :::'921,
provides among other things that "the
city or town council has power to lay
out, establish, open, alter, widen, ex-
tend, grade, pave or otherwise im'
prove streets, alleys, avenues, sicte-
walks, parks, and public grounds and
vacate the same." (Subdivision 6.)
Section 1612, Revised Codes of 1921,
defines public highway as follows:
"All highways, roads, lanes, streets,
alleys, courts, places, and bridges,
laid out or erected by the public, or
now traveled or used by the public,
or if laid out or erected by others,
dedicated or abandoned to the public,
or made such by the partition of real
property, are public highways." These
two sections must be considered to-
gether and in doing so the conclu-
sion cannot be escaped that whf;re :1
city or town council lays out or con-
structs an alley within the limits of
the city or town it represents, such
alley is a purlic highway. (State v.
District Court, 80 Mont. 228; see, also,
definition of term "alley" in "Words
and Phrases.")
It is apparent that the phrase "per-
manent highways and streets" amI
the phrase "public highways and
streets," found in Section 1 of Chap-
ter 103, Laws of 1933, are used in-
terchangeably and mean the same
thing.
As under Section 1 aforesaid the
city council has a voice only in the
designation of the street or highway
upon which the work is tn be done,
and the type of pavement to be used,
il would seem that when the designa-
tion is made the county surveyor is
vested with authority to proceed to
the end in a supervisory capacity.
I agree with all Mr. Hanley's con-
clusions except the conclusion that
the fund cannot be used for the con-
struction of public alleys within a
city having a population of 35,001) or
more. I think the legislature intend-
ed that "permanent highways and
streets" should include "alleys," noth-
ing to the contrary appearing in the
statute.
It may be informative to add that
Section 1 of Chapter 103, has been
amended in some respects by Section
1 of Chapter 38, Laws of Extraor-
dinary Session 1933-34, but the con-
clusions reached by Mr. Hanley are
not affected by the change.