16-155
Montana Attorney General Opinion 16-155
Length: 1,132 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 16 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 155
Opinion No. 155.
Taxation-Airplanes, Assessment of
-State Board of Equalization.
HELD: Since there is no statute au-
thorizing it, the State Board of
Equalization may not assess airplanes
in the first instance, whether used for
pleasure or convenience, or engaged
in intra-state or interstate commerce.
August 15, 1935.
State Board of Equalization
The Capitol
Your letter to us of July 25 is as
follows:
"The National Parks Airways, en-
gaged in interstate commerce be-
tween Salt Lake City, Utah, and
Great Falls, has requested that this
board assess the airplanes which we
consider properly assignable to Mon-
tana.
"Will you kindly advise us:
1. Whether this board has the
power to assess such airplanes.
2. If so, under what law should
they be assessed?
3. How should the assessment be
distributed, i. e., to counties, cities,
school districts and/or other taxing
subdivisions ...
The Constitution and laws of Mon-
tana define the powers of the State
Board of Equalization.
Section 15, Article XII, of the con-
stitution as amended in 1922, pro-
vides: "The state board of equaliza-
tion shall adjust and equalize the
valuation of taxable property among
the several counties, and the different
classes of taxable property in any
county and in the several counties and
between individual taxpayers; super-
vise and review the acts of the coun-
ty assessors and county boards of
equalization; change, increase, or de-
crease valuations made by county as-
· 154
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
sessors or equalized by county boards
of equalization; and exercise such au-
thority and do all things necessary to
secure a fair, just and equitable valu-
ation of all taxable property amol).g
counties, between the different classes
of property, and between individual
taxpayers. Said state board of equali-
zation shall also have such other
powers and perform such other duties
relating to taxation as may be pre-
scribed by law."
Section 16 of the same Article pro-
vides: "All property shall be assessed
in the manner prescribed by law ex-
cept as is otherwise provided in this
constitution. The franchise, roadway,
roadbed, rails and rolling stock of all
railroads operated in more than one
county in this state shall be assessed
by the state board of equalization and
the same shall be apportioned to the
counties, cities, towns, townships and
school districts in which such rail-
roads are located, in proportion to
the number of miles of railway laid
in such counties, cities, towns, town-
ships and school districts."
Section 8 of Chapter 3, Laws of
1923, authorizes the board "to an-
nually assess the franchise, Toadway,
roadbeds, rails, and rolling stock, and
all other property of all railroads,
and the pole lines and rights of way
and all other property of all tele-
graph and telephone lines, electric
power and transmission lines, ditches,
canals and flumes, and other similar
property, constituting a single and
continuous property operated in more
than one county in the state, and to
apportion such assessments to the
counties in which such properties are
located on a mileage basis; provided,
however, that lots and parcels of real
estate not included in right of way,
with the buildings, structures and im-
provements thereon, dams and power-
houses, depots, stations, shops, and
other builrlings, erected upon right of
way, furniture, machinery, and other
personal property, shall not uc con-
sider.ed as a part of any rmch single
and continuous property, but shall be
considered as separate Jlnd distinct
thEm::fl'om, and shall be asse~sed hy
the county assessor of the county
wherein they are situated." The same
section also authorizes the board "to
exercise general supervision over the
administration of the assessment and
tax laws of the state, and over as-
sessors, county boards of equalization,
boards of county commissioners, and
other officers of municipal corpora-
tions, having any duties to perform
under any of the laws of this state
relating to taxation to the end that
all assessments of property be made
relatively just and equal at true -value
in substantial compliance with law,
and to supervise the administration
of all revenue laws of the state and
assist in their enforcement, and for
that purpose may visit each county
in the state whenever deemed neces-
sary, and may call, not to exceed one
meeting of the county assessors each
year at the capitol, for consultation
and instruction, the expense of such
attendance to be paid by the respec-
tive counties."
Section 11 of Chapter 3 provides
that "whenever the board shall, in
any year, discover that any taxable
property of any person has not been
assessed in such year, or that it has
becn omitted from taxation during
any previous year or years, the board
may assess the same for such year
or for such previous years."
Section 1 of Chapter 161, Laws of
1933, provides that the board shall
assess the net proceeds of mines, roy-
alties and royalty interests.
Section 3 of Chapter 26, Laws of
1935, provides that the board shall
assess the properties of freight line
companies within the state.
The board possesses other powers
not necessary to recite here as they
are without any particular pertinency.
It is the duty of the county assessor
to assess, in the first instance, all
property subject to assessment other
than that which the board is required
to assess under the provisions of Sec-
tion 8 of Chapter 3, Laws of 1923; the
provisions of Section 161, Laws of
1933, and the provisions of Section
3 of Chapter 26, Laws of 1935. (Sec-
tions 2001-2047, Revised Codes 1921,
and amendments.)
The state board of equalization, as
the Supreme Court has said, "is a
special tribunal endowed with limited
powers and charged with the per-
formance of specific duties." (State
v. State Board of Equalization, 56
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
155
Mont. 450.) It must find the author-
ity for what it does in the constitu-
tion and laws. (State ex reI .. Tones
v. Erickson, 75 Mont. 429.)
Generally speaking, state officers,
boards, commissions and departments
have such powers as are expressly
delegated to them by constitutional
and statutory provisions, and such ad-
ditiunal powers as are necessarily im-
pliE'd from those which are expressly
granted. But executive and adIT'.iniR-
trative officers, boards, departments
and commissions have no powers he-
yond thpse granted by express pro-
vision or necessary implication. (59
C. J. 111.)
As there is no staiute which au-
thori2es the state boa~'d of equali:m-
tien to assess airp13.; les in the fir8t
instance, whether used for pleasure
or convenience, or engaged in intra-
state or interstate commerce, the an-
swer to the first question must be
in the negative. The answer to the
first question being what it is, an-
swers to the second and third ques-
tions become unnecessary.