16-182
Montana Attorney General Opinion 16-182
Length: 744 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 16 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 182
Opinion No. 182.
Milk Control Board-Licenses-
Annual License.
HELD: The milk dealer's license is
188
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
an "annual" license and covers a pe-
riod of twelve months-not merely a
calendar year or the balance thereof.
October 5, 1935.
Mr. G. A. Norris
Commissioner, Montana Milk Control
Board
The Capitol
You have submitted the question
whether the annual license fee of $10
collected by the Milk Control Board
from milk dealers, is for the year 1935
or for twelve months. You advise that
the Milk Control Board came into
existence on June 4, 1935, and that
three market areas were designated
by the board on July 1, 19:35, and that
thereafter the dealers in duch market
areas were required to pay the an-
nual license fee of $10. \'Vhiie your
letter does not so state, I presume
that subsequent to that time other
market areas have been established
and other dealers required to pay the
license fee of $10.
Chapter 189, Laws of 1935, was
approved March 16, 1935, and became
effective upon approval. (Section 14.)
Section 8 of the Act provides: "The
board shall require all dealers in any
market designated by said board to
be licensed by said board." And Sec-
tion 9 reads as follows: ,,* * * * The
board shall collect from each licensed
dealer an annual fee not to exceed
$10.00 for each dealer subdivision as
defined above."
In State ex reI. Carter v. Kall, 53
Mont. 162, 166, 162 Pac. 385, it was
said: "In the construction of a statute
the primary duty of the court is to
give effect to the intention of the
legislature in enacting it. (Lerch v.
Missoula Brick & Tile Co., 45 Mont.
314, Ann. Cas 1914A, 346, 123 Pac.
25.) The intention is to be sought in
the language employed and the ap-
parent purpose
to
be
subserved.
(Johnson v. Butte & Superior Copper
Co., 41 Mont, 158, 48 L. R. A. (n. s.)
938, 108 Pac. 1057.)"
This quotation, I believe, expresses
the rule generally in all jurisdictions.
Except for the use of the word "an-
nual" the legislature used no words
to indicate its intention. The word
"annual" is defined in Webster's dic-
tionary as follows: "Of or pertaining
~o a year; returning every year; c6m-
mg or happening once in the year;
yearly." It has also been defined as
meaning every twelve months. (State
v. McCullough, 3 Nev. 202, 224; 3 C.
J. 195.)
.
No words were used by the legis-
lature indicating an express or im-
plied intention to collect a fee of $10
for the calendar year of 1935. In the
absence of such words, we are not at
liberty to read them into the statute.
On the other hand, the word "annual"
as used in this Act would seem to
mean every twelve months. This
seems to be consistent with the pur-
pose of the Act. It will be noted from
Sections 8 and 9, supra, that the an-
nual license fee is not collected from
all milk dealers, but only from those
dealers in any market designated by
the board to be licensed by the board.
Until a market area has been desig-
nated by the board, the dealers in
that area are not required to pay li-
cense fee. The purpose of the fee is
to pay for the expenses of administra-
tion of the Act. (Section 4.) The deal-
ers in turn are protected by the en-
forcement of minimum prices.
Keeping in view the purpose of the
legislature to provide the cost of op-
eration under the Act from a col-
lection of fees from' those benefitted
in the market areas which may be
designated by the board, and that the
market areas are not designated un-
til the board takes action upon ap-
plication made (Section 6), it is my
opinion that the legislature intended
to collect a license fee from the date
of organization of the market, said
fee to cover a period of twelve months
and not merely for the calendar year
or the balance thereof. I believe this
is a just and equitable interpretation
of the statute and in the absence of
the intention of the legislature to
exact a fee for the calendar year, the
benefit of the doubt, if any, should
be in line with such construction. I
suggest, therefore, that the board, in
future collections from dealers, make
adjustments accordingly.