16-197
Montana Attorney General Opinion 16-197
Length: 418 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 16 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 197
Opinion No. 197.
MInes
and Mining-TaxatIon-Ma-
chinery and Improvements of an
Idle Mine, Assessment of-
County Assessor.
HELD: Machinery and surface im-
provements upon or appurtenant to
mines or mining claims, having a val-
ue separate from and independent of
such mines or mining claims must be
assessed by the County Assessor even
though the mines are not in opera-
tion.
November 4, 1935.
Mr. Anthony Hork
County Clerk
Hamilton, Montana
Your letter of October 25 is as fol-
lows:
"The Board of County Commis-
sioners would like an opinion on the
following question:
"Can mining machinery and im-
provements be assessed by the coun-
ty assessor on mining property that
is not operating. The contention is
that the Federal Laws prohibit this
assessment and should not be as-
sessed by the county."
Under Section 2088, Revised Codes,
1921, all machinery used in mining
and all surface improvements upon
or appurtenant to mines and mining
claims, which have a value separate
and independent of such mines or min-
ing claims, are personal property and
must be taxed as such. Section 2002
of the same code provides that the as-
sessor must, between the first Mo~
day of March and the second Monday
of July in each year, ascertain the
names of all taxable inhabitants and
all property in his county subject to
taxation, and must assess such prop-
erty to the persons by whom it was
owned or claimed, or in whose posses-
sion or control it was, at 12 o'clock
M., on the first Monday of March next
preceding.
If, therefore, any person or corpor-
ation should own machinery used in
mining and surface improvements
upon or apputenant to mines or min-
ing claims at 12 o'clock M., on the
first Monday of March of any year,
and such machinery or improvements
or both should have a value separate
from and independent of such mines
or mining claims, it then becomes the
duty of the assessor to assess the
same to such owner for that year,
and this without regard to whether
such mines be or be not in operation
or such mining claims be or be not in
course of developmer.t.
(Birney v.
Warren, 28 Mont. 64; Hayes v. Smith,
58 Mont. 306; 3 Opinions of Attorney
General 166.)
We are not aware of any federal
law which prohibits an assessment of
this kind, and if by any possibility
206
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
there be such a law it would be of
doubtful value.