16-342

Montana Attorney General Opinion 16-342

Length: 500 wordsOfficial source

Cite as 16 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 342

Opinion No. 342. Taxation-Redemption From Tax Sale--Courts-Action for Tax Deed, Costs of Redemp- tioner, Attorneys Fee. HELD: One who redeems, under the provisions of Section 2215.5, R. C. M. 1935, land from a tax sale is not required to pay plaintiff's attorney fee. August 12, 1936. Mr. Philip Savaresy Deputy County Attorney Billings, Montana We have your letter of August 1, from which we quote: OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 341 "An action has been instituted in the District Court for a tax deed, and the defendant, who was entitled to redeem under the provisions of 2215.5 pays to the County Treasurer the amount of delinquent taxes and penalties, with interest thereon at eight per cent, and also the costs of the action, and demands a certifi- cate of redemption from the County Treasurer, which he issued. The re- demptioner will not pay any attor- ney fees, claiming that an attorney fee as provided in 2215.6 can only be allowed when a judgment is ren- dered. "What this office would like to know is whether or not the redemp- tioner who proceeds under, Section 2215.5, and redeems by paying to the county treasurer, is also required to pay an attorney fee." The pertinent parts of the two sec- tions involved are: "* * " Any de- fendant to said action may make re- demption of said lands from said tax sale by paying the total amount of delinquent taxes and penalties with interest thereon at eight per centum (8%) per annum from date of pay- ment, which plaintiff shall have paid, together with costs of the action, and upon such payment a certificate of redemption therefrom shall be issued by the county treasurer of said coun- ty to the defendant so paying, and thereupon the said action shall be dis- missed; * * *." (Section 221.5.5, R. C. M.1935.) "* * * The court shall allow the suc- cessful party his costs to be fixed by the court including a reasonable at- torney's fee in all cases where the county is not the applicant." (Sec- tion 2215.6, R. C. M. 1.935.) When a defendant redeems, who is the successful party to the action? Certainly not the plaintiff for his cause of action is dismissed against him, and, therefore, under the express terms of Section 2215.6, supra, he is not entitled to a judgment for costs. The only liability of the redemp- tioner for the payment of costs is that fixed by Section 2215.5, supra, where no mention is made of attorney's fees. The rule is that attorney's fees are no part of the costs of an action in the absence of statute or stipulation. McBride v. School District, 88 Mont. 110, 290 Pac. 252; Bovee v. Helland, 52 Mont. 151, 156 Pac. 416; Thread- gill v. Home Loan Company, 122 So. 401; 219 Ala. 411; 61 Corpus Juris. ~462, and 15 Corpus Juris 114. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the position taken by the re- demptioner is correct.