17-3
Montana Attorney General Opinion 17-3
Length: 403 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 17 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 3
Opinion No.3.
Elections-Canvass, Publication of-
County Commissioners, Claims-
County Commissioners-Pow-
ers-County Printing, Of-
ficial Returns Are Not.
HELD: There is no authority for
the publication of official returns of a
county as county printing.
December 7, 1936.
Mr. E. P. Conwell
County Attorney. Carbon County
Red Lodge, Montana
Dear Sir:
You have requested my opi?ion
whether or not the county prmter
may print official returns for the pri-
mary and general elections and collect
for such printing as county printing.
The county printer in your county pub-
lished the official returns on N ovem-
ber 13th of this year, without being
ordered to do so. He was under the
impression that such printing was man-
datory, and now seeks to recover for
the publication as county printing.
You have expressed your opinion
that the claim is not a proper charge
against the county. With that opinion
we agree. It seems superfluous to state
that the county printer had no au-
thority to charge the county with
printing which has not been ordered
and which does not come within the
terms of his contract. The printing
under consideration here was not or-
dered. Whether it comes within the
terms of the contarct for county print-
ing we are not informed. For the pur-
pose of this opinion we shall assume
that the Board of County Commis-
sioners ordered the printing or in-
cluded the printing of official election
returns in the contract for county
printing. The result is the same.
The principle is firmly established in
this jurisdiction that the Board of
County Commissioners may exercise
only such powers as are expressly
granted it by statute and such as are
necessarily implied from those ex-
pressly granted. (Lewis v. Petroleum
County, 92 Mont. 563; American Surety
Co. v. Clarke, 94 Mont. 1.)
The authority of the Board of Coun-
ty Commissioners, then, to order the
printing of official election returns and
to pay for such publication from
county funds, must be found in the
laws of the State of Montana or it
cannot be said to exist at all. A close
reading on our part of the pertinent
provisions of our codes does not dis-
close the existence of the particular
power sought to be exercised in this
instance. (See Volume 2, Official Opin-
ions of Attorney General, page 6, which
is overruled as to the subject of the
second division of the syllabus.)