17-15
Montana Attorney General Opinion 17-15
Length: 974 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 17 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 15
Opinion No. 15.
Salaries-Deputies-County
Commis-
sioners.
HELD: Co u n t y
commissioners
cannot fix salary of deputy clerk and
recorder at a less amount than that
provided by statute.
A deputy county clerk and recorder
cannot waive her right to a reduction
of the minimum salary.
Mr. Ward Goble
County Attorney
Fallon County
Baker. Montana.
My dear Mr. Goble:
January 12, 1937.
You have requested an opinion from
this office on the following questions.
First:
Can the County Commis-
sioners fix the salary of a deputy
county clerk and recorder, at a less
amount than that fixed by statute?
Second:
Is a waiver in writing,
made by a deputy clerk and recorder
of a part of the statuatory salary, legal
and binding upon the maker thereof?
"Section 4873, R. C. M., 1935. The an-
nual compensation allowed to any
deputy * * * * as follows:
"Counties of the first class, coun-
ties of the fourth and fifth classes,
counties of the sixth and seventh
classes *. * * deputy clerks and
recorder at a rate of not less than
$1650.00."
This section provides not only the
maximum wage for deputy clerks in
the recorder's office, but the minimum
as well. The words of the statute, "Not
less," are clear and explicit and particu-
larly so in fixing the minimum salary
to be paid.
Section IS, R.C.M., 1935, "Words and
phrases used in the Codes or otner
statutes of Montana are construed ac-
cording to the context, and the ap-
proved usuage of the language; but
techinical words and phrases and such
others as have acquired a peculiar and
appropriate meaning in law, are de-
fined in the succeeding section, as
amended. are to be construed accord-
ing to such peculiar and appropriate
meaning or definition."
Stimpson v. Pond, Federal case No.
13455, 23 Federal Cases, 101.
Town of Central vs. Madden, 61 S. E.
1029. 9 Attorney General Reports,
page 365. 12 Attorney General Reports,
page 99. 15 Attorney General Reports,
page 180.
In the case of :Ylodesitt against Flat-
head County, 57 Montana, 216, the
court said in part:
"The annual compensation allowed
to any deputy or assistant as follows
* • *.
Counties of the fourth and
fifth classes * * *. Deputy treasurer
and deputy assessor allowed by law at
a rate of not less than one thousand,
six hundred and fifty dollars. * * ."
"As to the former (referring to the
above quoted section), the board can-
not decrease the compensation fixed
by Section 1."
Second question: The minimum and
maximum wage for deputy clerk and
recorder having been fixed by law, it
is impossible for the county, acting
through its Board of County Commis-
sioners, to either decrease or increase
the wage.
1£ the Board were able to
do so in any manner whatsoever, it
would be nullifying the law and invad-
ing the province of the legislature.
18
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
In Hicks against Stillwater County,
84, Mont. 38, at page SO, the court said:
"As plaintiff's compensation was
fixed by statute, it could only be
changed in like manner, and the ac-
ceptance of less than the amount
due on liquidated demands and under
the circumstances does not constitute
an accord and satisfaction, nor stop
plai~,tiff from claiming the balance
due.
When the employee or deputy clerk
and recorder filed her waiver with the
county, agreeing to accept a lesser
wage than the minimum wage pro-
vided by law, she entered into a con-
tract with the county.
"A contract is an agreement to do
or not to do a certain thing." Section
7467, "It is essential to the existence
of a contract that there should be
I. A lawful object."
Section 7499: "The object of the
contract must be lawful when the
contract is made. * * * "
Section 7501. "Where a contract
has but a single object, and such
object is unlawful, whether in whole
or in part, * * * , the entire contract
is void."
Our legislature has declared it in
violation of the law for a candidate
for public office to promise the elec-
torate that he will accept a lesser salary
than that provided by law, and in
exacting such legislation, it declared
such promises or inducements as con-
'trary to public policy. In carrying
this principle so declared by the legis-
lature a Iittie further, it should be
just as clear that it would be in viola-
tion of public policy for an encumbent
employee or deputy clerk and recorder,
or any other public officer, to agree
to accept a less wage than the mini-
mum provided by law.
In your letter, you state, "It has
been the custom in this county and I
believe other counties of the state,
in the interest of economy to make the
arrangements which are apparent from
the above Questions, with the various
deputies of county office, and I am
therefore asking for your opinion on
it."
The legislature has deemed it proper,
for the welfare of the general public
and all the counties of the state, to
fix a minimum standard of living wage
for this class of employees in the re-
spective classes of counties, and by the
performance of the law the taxpayers
of the county should receive more than
efficient and competent service and the
"Interests of economy should be en-
hanced."
It is therefore my opinion that the
Board of County Commissioners can-
not fix the salary of a deputy county
clerk and recorder at a less amount
than that fixed by statute, and a waiver
in writing made by deputy clerk and
recorder, waving a
portion of the
statutory salary, is neither lawful nor
binding upon her, and that the county
must pay her the minimum salary pro-
vided for by law.