17-15

Montana Attorney General Opinion 17-15

Length: 974 wordsOfficial source

Cite as 17 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 15

Opinion No. 15. Salaries-Deputies-County Commis- sioners. HELD: Co u n t y commissioners cannot fix salary of deputy clerk and recorder at a less amount than that provided by statute. A deputy county clerk and recorder cannot waive her right to a reduction of the minimum salary. Mr. Ward Goble County Attorney Fallon County Baker. Montana. My dear Mr. Goble: January 12, 1937. You have requested an opinion from this office on the following questions. First: Can the County Commis- sioners fix the salary of a deputy county clerk and recorder, at a less amount than that fixed by statute? Second: Is a waiver in writing, made by a deputy clerk and recorder of a part of the statuatory salary, legal and binding upon the maker thereof? "Section 4873, R. C. M., 1935. The an- nual compensation allowed to any deputy * * * * as follows: "Counties of the first class, coun- ties of the fourth and fifth classes, counties of the sixth and seventh classes *. * * deputy clerks and recorder at a rate of not less than $1650.00." This section provides not only the maximum wage for deputy clerks in the recorder's office, but the minimum as well. The words of the statute, "Not less," are clear and explicit and particu- larly so in fixing the minimum salary to be paid. Section IS, R.C.M., 1935, "Words and phrases used in the Codes or otner statutes of Montana are construed ac- cording to the context, and the ap- proved usuage of the language; but techinical words and phrases and such others as have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in law, are de- fined in the succeeding section, as amended. are to be construed accord- ing to such peculiar and appropriate meaning or definition." Stimpson v. Pond, Federal case No. 13455, 23 Federal Cases, 101. Town of Central vs. Madden, 61 S. E. 1029. 9 Attorney General Reports, page 365. 12 Attorney General Reports, page 99. 15 Attorney General Reports, page 180. In the case of :Ylodesitt against Flat- head County, 57 Montana, 216, the court said in part: "The annual compensation allowed to any deputy or assistant as follows * • *. Counties of the fourth and fifth classes * * *. Deputy treasurer and deputy assessor allowed by law at a rate of not less than one thousand, six hundred and fifty dollars. * * ." "As to the former (referring to the above quoted section), the board can- not decrease the compensation fixed by Section 1." Second question: The minimum and maximum wage for deputy clerk and recorder having been fixed by law, it is impossible for the county, acting through its Board of County Commis- sioners, to either decrease or increase the wage. 1£ the Board were able to do so in any manner whatsoever, it would be nullifying the law and invad- ing the province of the legislature. 18 OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL In Hicks against Stillwater County, 84, Mont. 38, at page SO, the court said: "As plaintiff's compensation was fixed by statute, it could only be changed in like manner, and the ac- ceptance of less than the amount due on liquidated demands and under the circumstances does not constitute an accord and satisfaction, nor stop plai~,tiff from claiming the balance due. When the employee or deputy clerk and recorder filed her waiver with the county, agreeing to accept a lesser wage than the minimum wage pro- vided by law, she entered into a con- tract with the county. "A contract is an agreement to do or not to do a certain thing." Section 7467, "It is essential to the existence of a contract that there should be I. A lawful object." Section 7499: "The object of the contract must be lawful when the contract is made. * * * " Section 7501. "Where a contract has but a single object, and such object is unlawful, whether in whole or in part, * * * , the entire contract is void." Our legislature has declared it in violation of the law for a candidate for public office to promise the elec- torate that he will accept a lesser salary than that provided by law, and in exacting such legislation, it declared such promises or inducements as con- 'trary to public policy. In carrying this principle so declared by the legis- lature a Iittie further, it should be just as clear that it would be in viola- tion of public policy for an encumbent employee or deputy clerk and recorder, or any other public officer, to agree to accept a less wage than the mini- mum provided by law. In your letter, you state, "It has been the custom in this county and I believe other counties of the state, in the interest of economy to make the arrangements which are apparent from the above Questions, with the various deputies of county office, and I am therefore asking for your opinion on it." The legislature has deemed it proper, for the welfare of the general public and all the counties of the state, to fix a minimum standard of living wage for this class of employees in the re- spective classes of counties, and by the performance of the law the taxpayers of the county should receive more than efficient and competent service and the "Interests of economy should be en- hanced." It is therefore my opinion that the Board of County Commissioners can- not fix the salary of a deputy county clerk and recorder at a less amount than that fixed by statute, and a waiver in writing made by deputy clerk and recorder, waving a portion of the statutory salary, is neither lawful nor binding upon her, and that the county must pay her the minimum salary pro- vided for by law.