17-30
Montana Attorney General Opinion 17-30
Length: 1,065 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 17 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 30
Opinion No. 30.
Old Age Pensions. State Relief Com-
mission.
HELD: The State Old Age Pen-
sion Commission may utilize funds
available to reimburse counties
in
old age pension expenditures, notwith-
standing that Federal funds have been
withdrawn.
January 29, 1937.
Montana Relief Commission
Mr. Joseph E. Watson
Administrator
Helena, Montana
My dear Mr. Watson:
You have requested an opinion from
this office as to whether or not the
State Old Age Pension Commission
can continue to reimburse County
Old Age Pension Commissions, from
funds in the Old Age Pension account,
in the State Treasury, on a matching
basis in the ratio of 75% to the county,
as provided by Section 8, Chapter 170
of the 1924 Session laws.
It appears, from the facts that you
have submitted, that the Federal So-
cial Security Board has suspended
the Montana plan; that at the present
time the Montana Relief Commission
has on hand, the sum of approximately
$150,000.00, which could be used at
this time for Old Age Assistance Pay-
ments; that the Montana Old Age
Pension Commission has at the present
time in the state treasury to its credit,
certain sums of money from the Fed-
eral Agency; and that the Federal
Agency has withdrawn its authoriza-
tion to expend such sums of money
by reason of the Social Security Board
suspending the Montana Plan.
The situation resolves itself into
the question of whether or not your
board is authorized to use the funds
it now has available to reimburse the
counties for disbursements within the
ensuing immediate future, and until
such time as new legislation can be
enacted, notwithstanding that the au-
thorization to use the federal funds has
been withdrawn.
Section 4 of Chapter 129, Session
Laws 24th Legislature provides:
"There is hereby created, and the
State Treasurer is hereby directed
to set up and establish a fund to be
known as the "Relief Fund", to which
shall be distributed such moneys as
are provided therefor by the Legisla-
tive Assembly, and such funds as
are made available to the State of
Montana, or the Governor thereof,
32
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
by the Federal Government, by or
through the President of the United
States, or by Act of Congress, or
by or through any department or
agency of the United States; or by
gift or grant from private sources,
or from any sources whatsoever, for
any of the purposes set forth in this
Act. The Montana Relief Commission
shall have authority to allocate a
portion of the relief fund for the
purpose of matching any Federal
funds which may become available
for old age assistance or aid to de-
pendent children, or other relief, wel-
fare or social security purposes for
which Federal funds are or may be-
come available on a matching basis."
Section 17 of said act provides:
"This act being necessarily for the
welfare of the state, shall be literally
con trued
to
effect
the
purposes
thereof."
Section I of the Act provides:
"* * * The purpose of which shall
be to provide means for the suste-
nance of life, shelter and the relief of
distress among the people of the state
whom economic conditions, industrial
inactivity, old age, unemployment or
other causes over which they have no
control have deprived of support
and to aid dependent children and ior
such other economic security func-
tions as are or may be assumed by
the state; * * * *".
The only restriction, of course, that
could be had upon the funds belonging
would be those restrictions, if any,
imposed by state law; it being obvious
that neither the federal agencies nor
the federal statute would have any
power to restrict the authority of the
State to expend its own funds. These
funds are to be used for the particular
purpose of Old Age Assistance, and
simply because the Federal agency
suspends its operation does not mean
that the authority of the State Commis-
sion
to use these funds can be cur-
tailed. The Act provides that the Re-
lief Commission shall have authority
to allocate a portion of the relief fund
for the pl1rpo~e of matching any Fed-
eral funds. which may become avail-
ahl .... for 0lrl A<:>;e As<istanre The use
of that language, namely, "matching,"
as applied in this Act, does not neces-
sarily mean equality, or dollar for
dollar, because the Act specifically de-
clares that a liberal construction shall
be given to the provision thereof in
accordance with the purpose of the
Act. And with the Act, itself, expressly
defining the spirit in which it may be
resolved, a common sense interpreta-
tion of the Act should be given, and
not an interpretation that would make
the Act so rigid that is could not apply
to an emergency,-a liberal interpre-
tation of the law will not resolve itself
into a dilemma. The purpose of the
Act is the relief of distress, Old Age
Unemployment, etc., and certainly a
temporary emergency exists, the per-
manent solution of which will require
new legislation.
Furthermore, Section 4 of the Act
uses the word "may," and not "must",
which is not a word of mandate, in
reference to the matching of the State
or Federal funds.
It would be in violation of the ex-
press provision to liberally construe
this Act, to hold that notwithstand-
ing the State has the funds available
to remedy, temporarily, and until such
time as the legislature may act, and
an emergency now prevailing, that
this money could not be used.
It is to be observed from your letter
that at the time the State funds were
accumulated, there was, and is. an
approximate equal sum from the Fed-
eral agencies, and to that extent the
State funds are actually matched, and
while the expenditure of the Federal
funds has recently been suspended, it
is also apparent that in the very near
future, if suitable guarantees are given
to the Federal agency. that these Fed-
eral funds may be used.
It is therefore my opinion, that, not-
withstanding that the Social Security
Board has suspended the Montana
plan and no funds are now available
from the Federal Agency, that the
State is authorized to reimburse the
counties from such funds as it now
has available, and the mere fact that
these funds are not equally matched
by the Federal Agency, is immaterial.