17-88
Montana Attorney General Opinion 17-88
Length: 330 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 17 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 88
Opinion No. 88.
Livestock -
Inspection at Destination.
Discretion of Livestock
Commission.
HELD:
Livestock commission has
discretion to authorize shipments of
livestock by trucks and inspection at
destination.
Livestock commission may prescribe
reasonable terms and conditions relat-
ing to shipments of livestock by truck.
Mr. Paul Raftery
Secretary, Montana
Commission
Helena, Montana
Dear Mr. Raftery:
April 17, 1937.
Livestock
You have requested my opinion as to
whether the Livestock Commission has
authority to permit the shipment of
livestock by truck to a livestock market
subject to brand inspection at destina-
tion.
Section 3324, as amended by Chapter
133, Laws of 1937, provides:
"* * * that the Livestock Commis-
sion may in its discretion authorize
said shipments to be made without
said inspection, in the event there is
an inspection made at destination by
a regularly employed stock inspec-
tor."
By this provision the Livestock Com-
mission is given a broad discretion
without any exception in case of ship-
ment of livestock by trucks. The fact
that a certain procedure is required by
the second paragraph of this section
where shipment is made other than by
railroad, does not, in my opinion, in
any way relate to, or limit the dis-
cretion given to the Livestock Com-
mission by the sentence above quoted.
Your second question, whether the
Livestock Commission may set up the
conditions under which shipments may
be made by truck, if the Commission
has discretion to permit such ship-
ments, is rather difficult to answer be-
cause you have not specified the condi-
tions.
\Ve cannot, therefore, answer
your question, except to say in general
that in our opinion, since the Livestock
Commission has discretion to authorize
the shipment of livestock by truck, it
may prescribe such reasonable terms as
may be necessary in order to carry out
the definitely expressed will or purpose
of the Legislature.
See State v. Dis-
trict Court, 103 Mont. 487, 63 Pac. (2)
141. and cases cited in Paragraph 8
thereof.