17-88

Montana Attorney General Opinion 17-88

Length: 330 wordsOfficial source

Cite as 17 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 88

Opinion No. 88. Livestock - Inspection at Destination. Discretion of Livestock Commission. HELD: Livestock commission has discretion to authorize shipments of livestock by trucks and inspection at destination. Livestock commission may prescribe reasonable terms and conditions relat- ing to shipments of livestock by truck. Mr. Paul Raftery Secretary, Montana Commission Helena, Montana Dear Mr. Raftery: April 17, 1937. Livestock You have requested my opinion as to whether the Livestock Commission has authority to permit the shipment of livestock by truck to a livestock market subject to brand inspection at destina- tion. Section 3324, as amended by Chapter 133, Laws of 1937, provides: "* * * that the Livestock Commis- sion may in its discretion authorize said shipments to be made without said inspection, in the event there is an inspection made at destination by a regularly employed stock inspec- tor." By this provision the Livestock Com- mission is given a broad discretion without any exception in case of ship- ment of livestock by trucks. The fact that a certain procedure is required by the second paragraph of this section where shipment is made other than by railroad, does not, in my opinion, in any way relate to, or limit the dis- cretion given to the Livestock Com- mission by the sentence above quoted. Your second question, whether the Livestock Commission may set up the conditions under which shipments may be made by truck, if the Commission has discretion to permit such ship- ments, is rather difficult to answer be- cause you have not specified the condi- tions. \Ve cannot, therefore, answer your question, except to say in general that in our opinion, since the Livestock Commission has discretion to authorize the shipment of livestock by truck, it may prescribe such reasonable terms as may be necessary in order to carry out the definitely expressed will or purpose of the Legislature. See State v. Dis- trict Court, 103 Mont. 487, 63 Pac. (2) 141. and cases cited in Paragraph 8 thereof.