17-155
Montana Attorney General Opinion 17-155
Length: 413 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 17 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 155
Opinion No. 155.
Bounty Claims-Livestock Commis-
sion-Duties of-Inspection Fees
of County Clerk.
HELD: The statutes do not confer
authority upon the Livestock Commis-
sion to disapprove claims of County
Clerk for bounty inspection of hides.
Mr. Paul Raftery
Secretary,
September 9, 1937.
Montana Livestock Commission
The Capitol
Dear Mr. Raftery:
You have called attention to certain
illegal bounty claims filed in Hill Coun-
ty, during the year 1936. In some of
these claims it has been admitted that
the claimants had presented claims for
gopher hides instead of coyote hides.
You have raised the question whether
or not the livestock commission has
authority to disapprove the claim of
the county clerk in cases where the
original claim for bounty has been dis-
approved.
The claim of the county clerk is
based on Section 3417.6, R. C. M., 1935
which provides 5¢ for the scalps of
wolves and coyotes examined by him.
Section 3417.8 provides as follows:
"It shall be the duty of the live-
stock commission to examine into
OPI:\IO~S OF THE ATTORNEY GEXERAL
177
and investigate every such bounty
claim and certificate filed with such
commission, and in making such ex-
amination and investigation, the com-
mission may require the holder of any
such certificate or claim to furnish
the commission with such additional
evidence or proof with
reference
thereto as the commission may deem
necessary and proper, and such evi-
dence may be either oral or docu-
mentary as required by the commis-
sion. The livestock commission shall,
after making such examination and
investigation, indorse on such cer-
tificate or claim its approval or dis-
approval thereof, and if the same or
any part thereof be disapproved, such
indorsement shaH state the reasons
for such disapproval. If any such cer-
tificate or claim be disapproved by the
commission, either in whole or in
part, the commission shan immedi-
ately notify the holder thereof of the
action of the commission and of the
reasons therefor, and the date when
said certificate or claim will be pre-
sented to the state board of examin-
ers for its action thereon."
The "certificate or claim" therein
mentioned refers ·to the certil1cate or
claim of the person who claims the
bounty. I do not find any provision
which makes it the duty of the live-
stock commission to approve or dis-
approve of the claim of the county
clerk. In the absence of such provision
there would be no such duty imposed
upon the livestock commission.