17-181
Montana Attorney General Opinion 17-181
Length: 484 wordsOfficial source
Cite as 17 Mont. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 181
Opinion No. 181.
Public Welfare -
Indians -
Guardian.
Old Age Assistance-Aid to Needy
Dependent Children.
HELD:
1. Payments of assistance
to Indians under Part III and Part IV,
Chapter 82, Laws 1937, may not be
made to Indian agents for recipients.
2. Payments of assistance under all
parts of Chapter 82, Laws 1937, must
be made directly to the recipient, or
his guardian appointed under the pro-
visions of State statutes.
October 21. 1937.
Mr. I. M. Brandjord
Administrator. State Department
of Public Welfare
Helena, Montana
Dear Mr. Brandjord:
Beg to acknowledge receipt of your
request for opinion as to whether or
not, in view of Circular No. 2924 from
the office of Indian Affairs, dated April
13, 1933, money paid to recipients of
Old Age Assistance and Aid to Needy
Dependent Children, for the benefit of
Indians, under the provisions of Chap-
ter 82, Laws, 1937, may be handled by
Indian agents.
The above mentioned circular deals
only with money payments "accruing
from the Veterans' Administration or
other governmental agency * * *," to
be handled and accounted for by him
with other monev under his control
in accordance with existing laws and
regulations of the Department of the
Interior.
Obviously, the term "other
governmental agencies," has reference
to Federal governmental agencies un-
der the jurisdiction of the Department
of the Interior.
Chapter 82, Laws of 1937, provides
that payments shall be made either to
the individual, or his legally appointed
guardian.
This office has so held in
Opinion 148, dated August 31, 1937.
Under Section VIII of Part III
(Old Age Assistance), provision is
made for payment to a legal1y ap-
pointed guardian.
This section con-
templates a guardian appointed in ac-
cordance with state law relating to
guardians.
Section VI of Part IV (Aid to
Needy Dependent Children), provides
that, "Such assistance shall be paid
* * * to the person having custody of
the child."
There is no provision in
Part IV for payment to a guardian.
It is therefore my opinion that Cir-
cular 2924 has reference only to pay-
ments when only federal funds are
involved, and in view of the fact that
payments under Chapter 82 involve
220
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
state and county funds, as well as
federal funds, and further in view of
the specific provisions of said chapter
with reference to payments, such pay-
ments of old age assistance and aid
to needy dependent children for the
benefit of Indian recipients cannot be
made to an Indian agent.
We recognize the fact that in the
case of Indians, many recipients are
incompetent to handle the money for
the purposes for which intended, but
in view of the specific provisions of
our statute we cannot hold otherwise.
The only method provided to prevent
misuse of assistance grants is by the
appointment of a guardian under the
guardianship procedure of our state
statutes.