MT CSI Advisory Memorandum of 2011-10-31 (Definition of Loss Montana Code Annotated § 33-24-102)
Definition of Loss Montana Code Annotated § 33-24-102
COMMISSIONER
OF SECURITIES & INSURANCE
MONICA J. LINDEEN
COMMISSIONER
ADVISORY MEMORANDUM
OFFICE OF THE MONTANA
STATE AUDITOR
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
All Property and Casualty Insurers Licensed in Montana
MONICA J. LINDEEN
Commissioner
of Securities a
Montana State Auditor
October 31, 2011
DEFINITION OF TOTAL LOSS
MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED
~ 33-24-102
The Office of the Commissioner
of Securities and Insurance, Montana State Auditor
(CSI), has recently been asked to clarify the method for determining "total loss" under
Montana's valued policy statute.
The valued policy statute sets forth the calculation
used to determine damages when an insurable event results in a total loss of an
improvement to real property.
Under Mont. Code Ann. 933-24-102,
when an insured
improvement
is,so adversely affected as to be considered a total loss, the value of the
insured property lost is conclusively presumed to be the full value of the insurance
policy.
The term "improvement"
includes all buildings and structures situated upon or affixed to
the land. This definition encompasses
mobile and manufactured
homes considered
"permanently
located" under the statute.
Meccage v. Spartan Ins. Co. (1970), 156
Mont. 135,138-139,477
P.2d 115,117;
Mont. Code Ann. 915-1-101(1)(i)
(2009).
For the purposes of the valued policy statute, a total loss occurs when an improvement
to real property is so significantly damaged that it no longer retains its '''identity and
specific character as a building.'''
Meccage, 156 Mont. at 140, 477 P.2d at 117 (quoting
Oshkosh Packing & Provision Co. v. Mercantile Ins. Co., 31 F. 200, 204 (E.D. Wis.
1887).
It is not necessary that the improvement or its component materials be totally
destroyed for a total loss to arise.
Nevertheless,
the damage incurred typically must be
grave to characterize the improvement as a total loss. Meccage, 156 Mont
as a building.'''
Meccage, 156 Mont. at 140, 477 P.2d at 117 (quoting
Oshkosh Packing & Provision Co. v. Mercantile Ins. Co., 31 F. 200, 204 (E.D. Wis.
1887).
It is not necessary that the improvement or its component materials be totally
destroyed for a total loss to arise.
Nevertheless,
the damage incurred typically must be
grave to characterize the improvement as a total loss. Meccage, 156 Mont. 135,477
Phone: 1-800-332-6148/ (406) 444-2040/ Main Fax: (406) 444-3497
Securities Fax: (406) 444-5558/ PHS Fax: (406) 444-1980/ Legal Fax: (406) 444-3499
840 Helena Ave., Helena MT 59601
Website: www.csi.mt.gov
E-Mail: csi@mt.gov
P.2d 115; Group Von Graupen v. Employers Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 259 F. Supp. 934
(D.P.R. 1966); Oshkosh, 31 F. 200; Hinkle v. N. River Ins. Co., 70 W. Va. 681,75
S.E.
54 (W. Va. 1912); O'Keefe v. Liverpool, London & Globe Ins. Co., 140 Mo. 558,41
S.W.
922 (Mo. 1897).
This test for determining whether a total loss has occurred applies to all improvements,
regardless of type.
If you have questions, please call the CSI Legal Bureau at (406) 444-2040.