45-239a
Register of Deeds
Cite as N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 45-239a
OPINION
45-239
March 1, 1945 (OPINION)
REGISTER OF DEEDS
RE: Records - Removal and Destruction
I acknowledge your letter of February 26, with reference to Sections
11-1814 and 35-0410 of the Revised Code of 1943.
Under the authority of Section 11 1814, the register of deeds is
authorized to remove and destroy all seed liens, labor liens,
stallion liens, chattel mortgages, and threshing liens filed prior to
January 1, 1937, in his office, which, by reason of the failure to
renew the same by affidavit or otherwise, have become outlawed and no
longer constitute liens upon the property mentioned or described
therein. Such removal from the files of the register of deeds'
office and destruction are to be had on or before January 1, 1944, or
as soon thereafter as is conveniently possible. At the time of the
destruction of these records, the register of deeds is directed to
note on the margin of the index opposite the record of each
instrument so removed and destroyed the date when the same was
destroyed. Under the terms of Section 35-0410 of the 1943 Revised
Code, any chattel mortgage filed under the law and renewed once
becomes void as against all persons and shall be cancelled of record
at the end of six years from the date of the filing of the original
mortgage. Then the section further provides that all chattel
mortgages or instruments of a like nature shall be kept on file in
the office of the register of deeds for a period of three years after
they have expired, and thereafter they may be removed from the files
and stored for safekeeping. Section 11-1814 was enacted at the 1935
legislative session as Chapter 164. It became effective July 1,
1935. Section 35-0410 of the 1943 Revised Code was enacted as
Chapter 167 of the 1943 Session Laws. In view of the fact that this
section is the last enactment, insofar as the two sections conflict
concerning chattel mortgages, it is the opinion of this office that
the register of deeds should, insofar as chattel mortgages are
concerned, comply with the terms of Section 35-0410, and when said
chattel mortgages are removed from the files in accordance with said
section, they should be stored for safekeeping as therein provided.
we feel that,insofar as these two sections of the code are in
conflict concerning the disposition of chattel mortgages, that the
register of deeds should comply with Section 35-0410 of the 1943
Revised Code by complying with its terms rather than the terms of
Section 11-1814. I believe that to be the proper and the safest
method of handling the disposition of chattel mortgages.
It might also be argued that where the two statutes conflict as to
the disposition of old chattel mortgages, the latest enactment upon
the subject should prevail.
NELS G. JOHNSON
Attorney General