46-95a

Elections

Year: 1946Length: 241 wordsOfficial source

Cite as N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 46-95a

OPINION 46-95 March 20, 1946 (OPINION) ELECTIONS RE: Precinct Committeemen May Not Act as Election Officers This will acknowledge the receipt of your letter of March 16, 1946, in which you inquire whether or not a candidate for precinct committeeman is qualified to act as clerk or judge of an election board. Section 16-1001 of the 1943 Revised Code reads as follows: "The judges of election, together with the inspector or elections, shall constitute the board of elections. No person shall be a member of the board of elections who: 1. Has anything of value bet or wagered on the result of an election. 2. Is a candidate at an election; or 3. Is the husband, wife, father, mother, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son, daughter, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother, sister, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law of any candidate at an election." It is my opinion that any candidate at any election, including a candidate for precinct committeeman, is disqualified from acting as judge or inspector of elections. A clerk appointed under the provisions of section 16-1012 of the Revised Code is not mentioned in section 16-1001. He is not a member of the election board. And apparently the qualifications prescribed by said section do not apply to him. But as a matter of public policy, it is my opinion that no candidate for any office, including that of precinct committeeman, should function even as a clerk of the board of elections. NELS G. JOHNSON Attorney General
46-95a: Elections | Justis AI