48-117a
Education
Cite as N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 48-117a
OPINION
48-117
March 2, 1948 (OPINION)
EDUCATION
RE: Reorganization - 1947 Law
Your letter of February 27, 1948, addressed to the attorney general,
has been received and contents of same have been noted.
You inquire if a consolidation plan of two school districts to be
combined into one is submitted to a vote, do these two districts vote
as a unit, and a majority so voting will decide the issue, or does
each district vote separately? And further, if one of these
districts does not carry but the other district does, what is the
result?
I assume that you have reference to the procedure for reorganization
of school districts provided by chapter 147 of the 1947 Session Laws,
known as the "School Reorganization Bill."
Section 18 of said chapter 147 provides that the county
superintendent shall call a special election of the voters residing
within the territory of each new district, such election to be held
at the place or places therein which have been determined by the
county superintendent to be convenient for the voters. In holding
such elections, any territory within the proposed new district
consisting of one or more incorporated villages or cities shall vote
as a unit, and all rural territory within such proposed new district
shall vote as a unit.
Said section 18 further provides that if a majority of all votes cast
by the electors residing within the rural area of a proposed new
district and a majority of all votes cast by the electors within the
incorporated area of the proposed new district are both in favor of
the formation of the district, then such reorganization is approved.
If the proposed plan fails of a favorable vote in either the rural
area or the incorporated area, then the plan is rejected.
Under section 20 of chapter 147 of the 1947 Session Laws, the
proposed reorganization may be revised and another election called.
If a majority of all votes cast by electors so residing within both
urban and rural units are in favor of the formation of the new
district, the county superintendent shall proceed to organize and
establish such district.
It is our opinion, therefore, that where a plan of reorganization is
proposed and such plan includes two or more districts, or parts of
two or more districts, outside of incorporated cities and villages,
then the voters in the proposed plan vote as a unit, and a majority
of all the votes cast within the proposed area are determinative of
the issue. But if an incorporated village or city is included in the
proposed district, then such incorporated village or city should vote
as a unit. And it requires a favorable vote of both the incorporated
unit and the unincorporated unit to carry the issue.
NELS G. JOHNSON
Attorney General