43-81
Poultry Board
Cite as N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 43-81
OPINION
43-81
September 29, 1943 (OPINION)
POULTRY BOARD
RE: Poultry Board
We have your letter of September 28th and the enclosed copy of a letter to you dated
September 21st from the International Baby Chick Association. You inquire whether it is
possible to collect a fee on chicks ordered by farmers through local stores which are
shipped from points outside North Dakota.
Section 5 of chapter 7 of Session Laws of 1939 provides for the licensing of the occupation
of selling baby chicks and turkey poults, fixing the license at one dollar per year plus fifty
cents per thousand or fraction of a thousand eggs sold. It also licenses hatcheries at one
dollar per year plus fifty cents per thousand eggs based upon manufacturer's rated
incubating capacity.
Objection has been made that the imposition of this license on sales made through a local
agent from outside of the state is a burden on interstate commerce and is invalid. We have
already considered this question on the sale of poultry feed, for which a license is provided
by the same law, and I herewith enclose a copy of the opinion written to you on August 18,
1941 from this office. The same rule applies to the sale of chicks in the state, even though
they may come from points outside of the the state. A case in the Supreme Court of the
United States even later than the one cited in that opinion is that of Caskey Baking
Company v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 61 S. Ct. 881, 313 U.S. 117, 85 L. ed. 1223. We
do not believe the case of Real Silk Hosiery Mills v. City of Portland, 45 S. Ct. 525, 69 L.
ed. 982, which seems to be the case referred to in the letter from the International Baby
Chick Association, and other "Drummer" cases are in point. There is no discrimination in
this state, all are treated alike, both resident and nonresident, and no distinction is made
between intrastate and interstate commerce.
We do, however, feel that the statute cannot be held to apply to hatcheries which are
outside of the state of North Dakota. A hatchery in Minnesota, for example, might sell only
ten percent of its incubation in North Dakota, and it this statute were held to apply, it would
attempt to fix a license fee based on the entire output of the hatchery.
We are enclosing an extra copy of this letter in case you care to send it to Mr. Turnbull of
the International Baby Chick Association.
ALVIN C. STRUTZ
Attorney General