46-297
Veterans
Cite as N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 46-297
OPINION
46-297
January 30, 1946 (OPINION)
VETERANS
RE: Service Officer
I have your letter of January 25, 1946, in which you say that as
county service officer you are asked every day by some war veteran
whether or not he could be legally assessed for the school poll tax
and for personal property taxes, while in the service, if he did not
possess any personal property other than the clothing which he had to
store or discard when he enlisted or was inducted.
Section 57-1523 of the North Dakota Revised Code of 1943 provides for
a levy each year of a per capita tax of one dollar on each person
twenty-one years of age or over "who on the first day of April in
such year has resided in the state ninety days or more.* * *"
Section 57-1523 imposes a tax of one dollar on every person, voter
and nonvoter, resident or nonresident, citizen or alien, who has
resided in the state ninety days or more on April first of any year.
It is our opinion that a member of the armed forces, whether
stationed in a camp in this country or whether he was overseas, was
not liable for payment of the school poll tax prescribed by said
section.
Section 37-0127 of the Revised Code provides:
Each member of the North Dakota national guard shall be exempt
from the payment of poll tax.* * *"
In 1940 the national guard was federalized, that is to say, each unit
of the national guard was mustered into the United States army.
It is our opinion that the intent and purpose of the law was that any
soldier, whether a member of the national guard or of the armed
forces of the United States, shall be entitled to such exemption.
And it is our opinion that such exemption extends to any person in
the armed forces, regardless of branch of service.
The statutes do not confer the privilege of exemption from personal
property taxes to persons in the service. But I am unable to
understand how assessors could determine the value of clothing owned
by a person in the service. Such person could not make a disclosure
of the clothing he or she owned. Certainly clothing or other
equipment furnished by the government could not be assessed. And, as
for civilian clothing, most of the returning veterans have had to buy
new clothes on their return home from the service. The civilian
clothes which they had when they entered no longer fit.
But the only way that a veteran can get redress is to pay such
personal property under protest and then ask for a refund or file a
petition with the county auditor for abatement.
NELS G. JOHNSON
Attorney General