47-45
District Court
Cite as N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 47-45
OPINION
47-45
April 18, 1947 (OPINION)
DISTRICT COURT
RE: Filing Fees
This will acknowledge your letter of April 9, 1947, with reference to
Senate Bill No. 151of the 1947 session. You want to know whether the
filing fee of $7.50 provided by subsection 1 of section 11-1704 of
the 1943 Revised Code, as amended by section 3 of Senate Bill
No. 151, should be charged in divorce actions, quieting title
actions, discharges of old mortgages, trusts, deposit actions and
adoptions.
Undoubtedly the $7.50 filing fee should be charged in the filing of
divorce actions and quieting title actions. I do not believe it
should be charged in ex parte proceedings dealing with the discharges
of old mortgages.
You will note that subsection 1 of section 11-1704 of the 1943
Revised Code was the only subsection amended. Accordingly, it must
have been the intent of the legislative assembly to leave the fees
enumerated in subsections 2 to 22 of that section the same as they
have always been. Subsection 21 specifically states that "for all
services in adoption proceedings, three dollars." The three dollar
filing fee has always been charged in adoption matters as far as I
can determine. Subsection 22 states that "for all services in
proceedings for deposit in court, three dollars." Accordingly, a
$3.00 filing fee charged for deposits is the same as it always has
been.
I am not entirely clear as to what you mean by trusts and accordingly
this opinion does not cover trusts at all. If you will explain
further what you mean by trusts, I shall be glad to go into that
matter.
It is the opinion of this office that Senate Bill No. 151 does not
change the filing fees set forth in subsections 21 and 22, dealing
with adoption proceedings and for proceedings for deposits in court.
Senate Bill No. 151 covers only the filing fee in what constitutes an
action such as divorce cases, quieting title cases, and other cases,
involving civil remedy. All the other fees enumerated in section
11-1704 of the 1943 Revised Code remain as they have always been.
NELS G. JOHNSON
Attorney General