48-89
Marriage
Cite as N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 48-89
OPINION
48-89
March 20, 1948 (OPINION)
MARRIAGE
RE: Husband and Wife - Responsibility for Stepchildren - Sec. 14-0909
Your letter of March 3, 1948, addressed to the attorney general, has
been received in which you present the following inquiry:
Section 14-0909 Revised Code of North Dakota for 1943 reads as
follows: 'A husband is not bound to maintain his wife's
children by a former husband, but if he receives them into his
family and supports them, it is presumed that he does so as a
parent and when such is the case, they are not liable to him
for their support, nor he to them for their services.'
May a man who marries a woman with children by a former
marriage and accepts them into his home and supports them later
disclaim the responsibility once assumed?"
Your office presented a similar question about a year ago, and on
March 6, 1947, we wrote you in response thereto, in which, among
other things, we stated:
Section 14-0909 quoted herein speaks for itself. It provides
specifically that a husband is not bound to maintain his wife's
children by a former husband, but if he receives them into his
family and supports them it is presumed he does so as a parent.
You will note that two things are required to hold a stepfather
liable for support of stepchildren, namely, he must voluntarily
receive them into his family and support them. In other words,
the acceptance must be voluntary and in addition he must
support them. Unless he does these two things he would not be
liable.
Your question cannot be answered by any general formula which
can be applied to every case but each case must stand on its
own state of facts."
What we said in our opinion of March 6, 1947, is applicable here.
The question presented, however, is where the relationship has once
been established, that is where a man who marries a widow with minor
children by a former marriage, voluntarily and unconditionally
accepts them into his home and supports them, may he afterwards
disclaim the responsibility thus assumed and refuse to furnish
support for such minor children.
Where a man has married a widow with minor children by a former
marriage and voluntarily and unconditionally accepts them into his
home and supports them, domestic and parental relationship has been
established and the family status of the minor children is fixed. It
would seem unreasonable that were the domestic status has been thus
established the relationship may subsequently be changed by
capricious change of mind and the family relationship thus disrupted.
A similar question was before the supreme court of our state in the
case of Druey v. Druey, 63 N.D. 786, 249 N.W. 782. In that case, one
Druey had married a widow with minor children by a former marriage.
Certain disagreement arose between the husband and wife, with
reference to a minor girl, daughter of the wife by a former marriage,
and section 14-0909 of the 1943 Revised Code was construed. In its
opinion, among other things, the court said:
Under this statute a husband can stand on his strict legal
rights and refuse to have anything to do with his stepchildren,
but when he receives them into his family the law presumes that
he does so as a parent and they stand in their relations to
each other as parents and children."
The court further said:
A stepparent does not, merely by reason of the relation, stand
in loco parentis to the stepchild. . . . But a stepparent who
voluntarily receives the stepchild into the family and treats
it as a member thereof stands in the place of the natural
parent, and the reciprocal rights, duties, and obligations of
parent and child continue as long as such relation continues."
The court further said:
Dorothy (the minor child involved) was only twelve years old
when the plaintiff and defendant married and the defendant
received her into the family, treating her as a member thereof,
contributing largely to her support and education and, in law,
standing in the place of the natural parent with their
reciprocal rights, duties and obligations the same as those of
parent and child."
It is the opinion of this office, therefore, that where a man marries
a widow with minor children by a former marriage and voluntarily and
unconditionally accepts them into a home and supports them, the
relationship of parent and child is thereby assumed as a matter of
law, and a domestic relationship and status thus established continue
until the legal emancipation of the child or children or until the
relation is discontinued voluntarily and by mutual consent.
The relationship thus assumed has legal sanction and is necessary for
the protection of the home, minor children, and the general welfare
of society.
NELS G. JOHNSON
Attorney General