49-92
Insurance
Cite as N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 49-92
OPINION
49-92
October 7, 1949 (OPINION)
INSURANCE
RE: Gift of Fire Alarm to Each Policy Purchaser Illegal
You have asked this office for an opinion in regard to a letter
written by Mr. W.E. LaPlante, on October 3, 1949, to the Insurance
Commissioner.
In his letter, Mr. LaPlante is suggesting that one of two types of
fire alarms systems be given to the purchaser of an insurance policy
from his company. In the letter he writes: "I am suggesting to one
of my insurance companies that they give one or another of these
alarms to each policyholder who purchases insurance with a premium of
a minimum amount, (to be determined later) or will sell such an alarm
at a favorable price to policyholders whose premium is lower."
Section 26-1010 of the 1947 Supplement provides:
"No agent of any insurance or surety company, reciprocal,
benevolent society, or any fraternal benefit society, or any
other insurance organization or association, however
constituted or entitled, shall grant, and no insured person or
party or applicant for insurance either directly or indirectly,
shall receive or accept, or agree to receive or accept, any
rebate of premium, or of any part thereof, or all or any part
of any agent's or solicitor's commission thereon, or any favor
or advantage, or any share in any benefit to accrue under any
policy of insurance, or any other valuable consideration or
inducement other than such as may be specified in the policy,
except as provided in an applicable filing which is in effect
under the provisions of the laws regulating insurance rates."
You will note that this section states that an insurance company may
not give any favor or inducement other than as may be specified in
the policy.
It is my opinion that the giving of a fire alarm or the sale of a
fire alarm at a favorable price with a policy of insurance would
constitute a favor or an inducement as would be prohibited by section
26-1010 of the 1947 Supplement.
It is, therefore, my conclusion that this type of procedure would be
illegal in the State of North Dakota. It might be further noted that
the certain form of insurance policy prescribed by the code does not
make a provision for this type of undertaking.
WALLACE E. WARNER
Attorney General