50-27
Corporations
Cite as N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 50-27
OPINION
50-27
March 3, 1950 (OPINION)
CORPORATIONS
RE: Increase of Capitol Stock
Re: Section 10-0330 N.D.R.C. 1943
Your letter to the attorney general of date March 3rd, 1950,
concerning the interpretation of the above section has been received
and referred to my desk for attention.
You state that you have recently received papers from several
domestic corporations purporting to increase their capital stock, all
failing to show compliance with section 138 of the North Dakota
Constitution and section 10-0330 N.D.R.C. 1943 in the matter of
notice of the proposal to increase the capital stock of these
corporations as required by the above sections of the Constitution
and statutes.
Section 10-0330 N.D.R.C. 1943 provides explicitly for notice to each
stockholder of the time and place of a meeting to be held to consider
the proposal to increase stock, and provides specifically for the
manner of service of this notice.
It is our opinion that an attempt to increase the stock of a domestic
corporation without strict compliance with this notice would be a
nullity. This provision governs all domestic corporations excepting
only those having a specific statute governing them. See sections
6-0323 and 26-0816 for specific exceptions.
The provision in section 10-0330 N.D.R.C. 1943 for the sixty-day
notice was enacted to comply with the provisions of section 138 of
the North Dakota Constitution. THere is no authority whatever for an
omission or waiver of this notice, not even in the case of a small
corporation when all stockholders are present and consent to a waiver
or omission. There may be instances where a statutory provision for
the benefit or protection of certain persons may be waived, but we do
not believe that a constitutional provision may be so waived.
Therefore, it is our opinion that, before an increase or diminution
of the capital stock of a corporation - that is, a domestic
corporation - with exceptions noted above, can be effected, there
must be filed in your office the certificate provided for by section
10- 0330 N.D.R.C. 1943, and that such certificate must show due
notice as above noted. It is also our opinion that you should refuse
to file any certificate which does not comply with said section. We
would suggest that non-acceptable certificates be returned to the
senders with statement why the same may not be filed.
WALLACE E. WARNER
Attorney General