02-O-02
Valley Regional Dispatch Center Board
Cite as N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 02-O-02
OPEN RECORDS AND MEETINGS OPINION
2002-O-02
ATE ISSUED:
February 4, 2002
SUED TO:
ey
Garylle Stewart, Attorney, City of Fargo
CITIZEN’S REQUEST FOR OPINION
D
IS
Birch Burdick, Cass County States Attorn
On January 11, 2001, this office received a request for an opinion under N.D.C.C.
§ 44-04-21.1 from Steven Johnson on behalf of the Fargo Forum asking whether the
Valley Regional Dispatch Center Board violated N.D.C.C. § 44-04-19 by denying a
erson’s request to attend a meeting of the Board.
FACTS PRESENTED
yor of Fargo and the chairman of the Cass County
oard of County Commissioners.
p
The city of Fargo, Cass County North Dakota, the City of Moorhead, and Clay County
Minnesota signed a joint powers agreement for the joint administration of a dispatch
center. The agreement establishes a seven-member “Valley Regional Dispatch Center
Board” (Board) responsible for administering the dispatch center. The four parties
formed the agreement “through action of their respective governing bodies.” The
agreement was signed by the ma
B
On January 9, 2002, the Board held a meeting. In response to the request for this
opinion, this office contacted the Fargo Chief of Police and confirmed that a reporter for
the Fargo Forum was not allowed to attend the Board meeting. The chief of police also
indicated that, to the best of his knowledge, no part of the discussion at the meeting was
uthorized to be held in an executive session. The meeting was not recorded.
ISSUE
d N.D.C.C. § 44-04-19 by
enying a person’s request to attend a meeting of the Board.
ANALYSIS
a
Whether the Valley Regional Dispatch Center Board violate
d
The open meetings law, N.D.C.C. § 44-04-19, requires that all “meetings” of a “public
entity” be open to the public unless otherwise specifically provided by law. The
definition of “public entity” includes any agency of a political subdivision.
OPEN RECORDS AND MEETINGS OPINION 2002-O-02
February 4, 2002
Page 2
tity” and required to comply with N.D.C.C. § 44-04-19.
e to an applicable open meetings exception, was a
violation of N.D.C.C. § 44-04-19.
CONCLUSION
N.D.C.C.
§ 44-04-19 by denying a person’s request to
ttend a meeting of the Board.
STEPS NEEDED TO REMEDY VIOLATION
, at which it recreates the discussion that occurred during its January 9
eeting.
ersons responsible for the noncompliance. Id.
N.D.C.C. § 44-04-17.1(12)(b). A joint enterprise created by a joint powers agreement of
several political subdivisions whereby the subdivisions delegate their performance of a
governmental function to the joint enterprise is an “agency” of those subdivisions and,
therefore, is a “public entity” subject to the open records and meetings laws. N.D.A.G.
98-O-04. Operation of the dispatch center is a governmental function. Therefore, it is
my opinion that the dispatch center created in the joint powers agreement is a “public
en
The Board, as the governing body of the dispatch center, may not refuse to allow
members of the public to attend its meetings unless a specific law authorizes an
executive session. If an executive session is authorized, the procedures in
N.D.C.C. § 44-04-19.2 must be followed. In this case, the Board did not close a portion
of its meeting based on an applicable exception to N.D.C.C. § 44-04-19. Instead, the
Board simply refused to allow the person to attend its entire meeting. It is my opinion
this refusal, lacking any referenc
It is my opinion the Valley Regional Dispatch Center Board violated
a
The Board must hold a meeting, preceded by proper public notice under N.D.C.C.
§ 44-04-20
m
Failure to issue within seven days of the date this opinion a written public notice under
N.D.C.C. § 44-04-20 of a meeting at which the Board will recreate its discussion on
January 9 will result in mandatory costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees if
the person requesting the opinion prevails in a civil action under N.D.C.C. § 44-04-21.2.
N.D.C.C. §44-04-21.1(2). It may also result in personal liability for the person or
p
Attorney General
Assistant Attorney General
vkk
Wayne Stenehjem
Assisted by: James C. Fleming