NDAC 75-02-04.1-09
Criteria for rebuttal of guideline amount
Cite as N.D. Admin. Code ยง 75-02-04.1-09
1.
The child support amount provided for under this chapter, except for subsection 2, is
presumed to be the correct amount of child support. No rebuttal of the guidelines may be
based upon evidence of factors described or applied in this chapter, except in subsection 2, or
upon:
a.
Except as provided in subdivision m of subsection 2, the subsistence needs, work
expenses, and daily living expenses of the obligor; or
b.
Except as provided for in subdivision p of subsection 2, the income of the obligee, which
is reflected in a substantial monetary and nonmonetary contribution to the child's basic
care and needs by virtue of being a parent with primary residential responsibility.
2.
The presumption that the amount of child support that would result from the application of this
chapter, except for this subsection, is the correct amount of child support is rebutted only if a
preponderance of the evidence establishes that a deviation from the guidelines is in the best
interest of the supported children and:
a.
The increased need if support for more than six children is sought in the matter before
the court;
b.
The increased ability of an obligor, with a monthly net income which exceeds twenty-five
thousand dollars, to provide additional child support based on demonstrated needs of the
child, including, if applicable, needs arising from activities in which a child participated
while the child's family was intact;
c.
The increased need if educational costs have been voluntarily incurred, at private
schools, with the prior written concurrence of the obligor;
d.
The increased needs of children with disabling conditions or chronic illness;
e.
The increased needs of children age twelve and older;
f.
The increased needs of children related to the cost of child care, purchased by the
obligee, for reasonable purposes related to employment, job search, education, or
training;
g.
The increased ability of an obligor, whose net income has been substantially reduced as
a result of depreciation and to whom income has been imputed under section
75-02-04.1-07, to provide child support;
h.
The increased ability of an obligor, who is able to secure additional income from assets,
to provide child support;
i.
The increased ability of an obligor, who has engaged in an asset transaction for the
purpose of reducing the obligor's income available for payment of child support, to
provide child support;
j.
The reduced ability of an obligor who is responsible for all parenting-time expenses to
provide support due to travel expenses incurred predominantly for the purpose of visiting
a child who is the subject of the order taking into consideration the amount of
court-ordered parenting time and, when such history is available, actual expenses and
practices of the parties;
k.
The reduced ability of the obligor to pay child support due to a situation, over which the
obligor has little or no control, which requires the obligor to incur a continued or fixed
expense for other than subsistence needs, work expenses, or daily living expenses, and
which is not otherwise described in this subsection;
l.
The reduced ability of the obligor to provide support due to the obligor's health care
needs, to the extent that the costs of meeting those health care needs:
(1)
Exceed ten percent of the obligor's gross income;
(2)
Have been incurred and are reasonably certain to continue to be incurred by the
obligor;
(3)
Are not subject to payment or reimbursement from any source except the obligor's
income; and
(4)
Are necessary to prevent or delay the death of the obligor or to avoid a significant
loss of income to the obligor.
m.
The reduced ability of the obligor to provide support when the obligor is in the military, is
on a temporary duty assignment, and must maintain two households as a result of the
assignment;
n.
The reduced ability of an obligor who is responsible for educational costs for the
supported children that are incurred at private schools;
o.
The reduced ability of an obligor who is responsible for child care costs for the supported
children;
p.
The reduced needs of the child to support from the obligor in situations where the net
income of the obligee is at least three times higher than the net income of the obligor;
q.
The reduced needs of the child to support from the obligor in situations where the child is
residing outside the family home at government expense and the obligation is not
assigned to a government agency; or
r.
The improved convenience to the parents, and negligible impact to the child, of a nominal
increase in the child support obligation of the parent with the smaller obligation as
determined under section 75-02-04.1-03 or 75-02-04.1-08.2, not to exceed seventy-five
dollars per month, in order for the obligation of each parent to be equal prior to
application of the payment offset provided in that section and eliminate any net amount
being due except during months when the obligation is assigned to a government
agency.
3.
Assets may not be considered under subdivisions h and i of subsection 2, to the extent they:
a.
Are exempt under North Dakota Century Code section 47-18-01;
b.
Consist of necessary household goods and furnishings; or
c.
Include one motor vehicle in which the obligor owns an equity not in excess of twenty
thousand dollars.
4.
For purposes of subdivision i of subsection 2, a transaction is presumed to have been made
for the purpose of reducing the obligor's income available for the payment of child support if:
a.
The transaction occurred after the birth of a child entitled to support;
b.
The transaction occurred no more than twenty-four months before the commencement of
the proceeding that initially established the support order; and
c.
The obligor's income is less than it likely would have been if the transaction had not
taken place.
5.
For purposes of subdivision k of subsection 2, a situation over which the obligor has little or no
control does not exist if the situation arises out of spousal support payments, discretionary
purchases, or illegal activity.
6.
For purposes of subdivisions a through f and subdivisions q through r of subsection 2, any
adjustment shall be made to the child support amount resulting from application of this
chapter. When section 75-02-04.1-03 or 75-02-04.1-08.2 applies, the adjustment must be
made to the parent's obligation before the lesser obligation is subtracted from the greater
obligation.
7.
For purposes of subdivisions g through o of subsection 2, any adjustment shall be made to the
obligor's net income.
8.
For purposes of subdivision p of subsection 2, any adjustment shall be made to the child
support amount resulting from application of this chapter after taking into consideration the
proportion by which the obligee's net income exceeds the obligor's net income. When section
75-02-04.1-03 or 75-02-04.1-08.2 applies, the adjustment must be made to the parent's
obligation before the lesser obligation is subtracted from the greater obligation.