08-001
Use of Construction Management at Risk Method by Community Colleges
Cite as Neb. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 08-001
JON BRUNING
ATIORNEY GENERAL
SUBJECT:
STATE OF NEBRASKA
®ffice of tbe %lttornep ~enerai- · :±t- ogco/
1'-:0.
2115 STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
LINCOLN, NE 68509-8920
(402) 471-2682
TOO (402) 471-2682
CAPITOL FAX (402) 471-3297
TIERONE FAX (402) 471-4725
STfTE: 0:: t, ':::'~I\S!\1\
0
~ -·
~ -.: ~
·.·. ~
~ _ ···~ '.
DEPT. Or JUSTICE
Use of Construction Management at Risk Method by Community
Colleges.
REQUESTED BY: Michael J. Flood, Senator
Nebraska State Legislature
WRITTEN BY:
Jon Bruning, Attorney General
Lynn A. Melson, Assistant Attorney General
You have requested our opinion whether the use of "construction management at
risk" services is prohibited under Nebraska law. We have learned from your staff that
your specific question is whether community colleges may use this method for their
construction projects.
You have also stated that, if the use of such services by
community colleges is prohibited, you may introduce legislation on this topic.
According to the information that you have submitted to our office, the
construction management at risk method is an alternative to the traditional "design - bid
- build" method of building construction. The term "construction management at risk
contract" is defined at Neb. Rev. Stat. §79-2003(1) as follows:
Construction management at risk contract means a contract
by which a construction manager (a) assumes the legal
responsibility to deliver a construction project within a
contracted price to the school district, (b) acts as a
Printed with soy ink on recycled paper
Senator Michael J. Flood
Page 2
construction consultant to the school district during the
design development phase of the project when the school
district's architect or engineer designs the project, and (c) is
the builder during the construction phase of the project;
This statutory definition is part of the Nebraska Schools Construction Alternatives Act
which was enacted in 2002 and applies solely to school districts.
Our review of
Nebraska statutes reveals this is the only mention of this term in current statutes.
With your request letter you enclosed information submitted by the Executive
Director of the Associated General Contractors, Nebraska Building Chapter. That letter
explains that, in the construction management at risk method, the construction manager
is also the constructor and that the construction manager/constructor "typically provides
preconstruction services, holds the trade contracts, takes responsibility for performance
of the actual work and guarantees the construction costs and schedule."
You have also provided us with a letter you received from the State Auditor which
suggests that the construction management at risk method can not be employed by
political subdivisions in Nebraska because a facility would need to be designed prior to
accepting bids for the construction portion of the project.
You then ask our office
whether construction management at risk services are prohibited under Nebraska law
and you note that school districts in Nebraska as well as the University of Nebraska
system have built several buildings using construction management at risk services.
In Nebraska, community colleges are governed, in part, by the Coordinating
Commission for Postsecondary Education. The Commission is a state agency which
has been established under the Nebraska Constitution as the entity "which shall, under
the direction of the Legislature, be vested with the authority for coordination of public
postsecondary educational institutions." Neb. Const. art. VII, § 14. By virtue of this
constitutional provision, the Commission has the authority to review and approve or
disapprove capital construction projects which utilize tax funds designated by the
Legislature. See, also, the Coordinating Commission for Postsecondary Education Act,
Neb. Rev. Stat.§ §85-1401 to 85-1420 (1999, Cum. Supp. 2006 and Supp. 2007).
While subject to coordination by the Commission, locally governed community
college areas have been established with each community college area governed by a
board of governors. Neb. Rev. Stat. § §85-1504 and 85-1506 (1999). These local
political subdivisions also have duties with regard to construction projects.
The Nebraska Supreme Court has held, "[a]dministrative bodies ... have only that
authority specifically conferred upon them by statute or by construction necessary to
achieve the purpose of the relevant act." Jolly v. State, 252 Neb. 289, 562, N.W.2d 61
(1997).
The same may be said of political subdivisions of the State.
A political
Senator Michael J. Flood
Page 3
subdivision has no inherent authority. Rather, it "has only that power delegated to it by
the Legislature, and a grant of power to a political subdivisions is to be strictly
construed." DLH, Inc. v. Lancaster County Board of Commissioners, 264 Neb. 358,
362, 648 N.W.2d 277, 280 (2002).
We have found no statute which expressly
delegates to community colleges the authority to employ the construction management
at risk method. Moreover, with regard to community colleges, Neb. Rev. Stat. §85-1519
(1999) provides that each community college board of governors "shall adopt plans and
specifications in advance of letting bids for any capital construction project. Such plans
and specifications shall be the basis upon which the bids are received." This statutory
language may be said to reflect legislative intent that boards first adopt a design before
accepting bids from contractors. In other words, such language appears to reflect the
more traditional design- bid -build method.
While you note that school districts and the University of Nebraska system
currently use the construction management at risk method for their capital construction
projects, we note that those entities are governed by different statutes. For example,
school districts in Nebraska have been specifically authorized by our legislature to use
the construction management at risk method in the Nebraska Schools Construction
Alternatives Act. Neb. Rev. Stat. § § 79-2001 to 79-2015 (2002).
For all of these reasons, we believe there is insufficient statutory authority for the
use of the construction management at risk services by community colleges. You may
wish to consider appropriate legislature to ensure that this method may be employed.
Approved by:
09-002-20
Sincerely,
JON BRUNING
Attorney General
~
/}. »leJ:;r----__
0.~~~~ - Melson
Assistant Attorney General