00-028
Nebraska Investment Council; Time Deposit Open Account, Statutory Requirements
Cite as Neb. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 00-028
DON STENBERG
ATTORNEY GENERAL
DATE:
SUBJECT:
STATE OF NEBRASKA
®ffir~ nf f4~ ~fnru~y- ~~u~ral
:-·· ·:
\ , •, ·.
2115 STATE CAPITOL BUILDING
LINCOLN, NE 68509-8920
(402) 471-2682
TOO (402) 4 71 -2682
CAPITOL FAX (402) 471-3297
1235 K ST. FAX (402) 471 -4725
itOOGJ
STATE:'Ofi·NEBRASQ
0
Or·f' I CIA~
JUN
5 2000
May 25, 2000
STEVE GRASZ
LAURIE SMITH CAMP
DEPUTY ATTORNEYS GENERAL
,~
·. , ··-.
~
~ ..
Nebraska Investment Council; Time Deposit Open Account, Statutory
Requirements
REQUESTED BY: Rex Holsapple, State Investment Officer
WRITTEN BY:
Don Stenberg, Attorney General
Fredrick F. Neid, Assistant Attorney General
This is in answer to the various questions you have asked regarding legislative
amendments to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 72-1263 (1996). The amendments change amounts for
time deposit open accounts of available state funds deposited in financial institutions.
Section 72-1263 was amended by the provisions of LB 932 (Laws 2000) passed with the
emergency clause and approved by the Governor on April 13, 2000.
I.
LEGISLATIVE BILL 932 AMENDMENTS
It is initially inquired, "[w]hat happens to those banks already in the program for any
amount under $300,000.00? Even with the passage of LB 932, can a depository bank,
because of their contract, stay in the TDOA program at a level below $300,000.00 until
their maturity date?" We believe that existing time deposit open accounts with depository
Jenn~er M. Amen
DaVId K. Arterburn
William R. Barger
L. Jay Bartel
J Kirk Brown
Marie C. Clarke
Dale A. Comer
David D. Cookson
Kyle C. Dahl
Suzanne Glover-Ettrlch
Scott G . Gunern
Susan J. Gustafson
Robert E. Harkins
Royce N . Harper
Jason W . Hayes
Amber F. Henrick
William L. Howland
Marilyn B. Hutchinson
Therese N. James
Kimbe~y A. Klein
Cha~otte R. Koranda
Cha~es E. Lowe
Lisa D. Martin-Price
Lym A. Melson
Donald J. B. Miller
Printed vvith soy ink on recycled paper
Ronald D. Moravec
Fredrick F. Neid
Thomas J. Olsen
Perry A. Pirsch
Mark D. Raffety
Hobert B. Rupe
James D. Smith
James H. Spears
Mark D. Starr
Martin Swanson
John R. Thompson
Barry Waid
Terri M. Weeks
Melanie J. W hlttamore-Mantzios
Linda L. Willard
Rex Holsapple, State Investment Officer
May 26, 2000
Page 2
institutions may be maintained consistent with the terms and conditions of the written
contracts entered into between the state investment officer and the depository institution.
Section 35 of LB 932 provides:
72-1263. The state investment officer shall, out of funds available for investment,
cause to be offered to all banks and building and loan associations in this state a
time deposit open account in the amount of ooe three hundred fi#y thousand
dollars, except that any bank or building and loan association may accept such offer
in amounts increments of one hundred thousand dollars or fifty thousand dollars.
Such deposit shall be available at any investment date to such banks_or building
and loan associations as are willing to meet the rate and other requirements set
forth in the Nebraska Capital Expansion Act and make application therefor. The
balance of the funds available for investment shall then be offered at the same rate
to the banks and building and loan associations making application for and
otherwise qualifying for such deposit. Such deposit shall be offered in increments
of fifty thousand dollars. No deposit shall be made when doing so would violate a
fiduciary obligation of the state or section 72-1268.07. All funds not investable
under this section shall be invested as provided by section 72-1246. No one bank
or building and loan association may receive for deposit a sum of more than-ftve
hundred thousand one million dollars or an amount not to exceed the amount
covered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, plus twice the institution's
equity capital or net worth or as otherwise provided for by law, whichever is less.
The amendments of§ 72-1263 by LB 932 increase amounts of state funds for
deposit in time deposit open accounts from one hundred fifty thousand to three hundred
thousand dollars. The amount offered for deposit by the state investment officer may be
accepted by financial institutions in one hundred thousand or fifty thousand dollar
increments. It is our conclusion that existing accounts of less than three hundred thousand
are consistent with statutory requirements because the statute expressly states that
amounts may be accepted by depository institutions in one hundred thousand or fifty
thousand dollar increments.
II.
TIME OPEN DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS
Additional questions are posed relating to the impact of the legislative amendments
on existing time deposit open accounts. A time deposit open account is defined in Neb.
Rev. Stat.§ 72-1262 (Cum. Cup. 1998) in the following manner:
(3) Time deposit open account shall mean a bank account or a deposit with a
building and loan association with respect to which there is in force a written
Rex Holsapple, State Investment Officer
May 25,2000
Page 3
contract which provides that neither the whole nor any part of such deposit may be
withdrawn, by check or otherwise, prior to the date of maturity, which date shall not
be less than thirty days after the date of deposit, or prior to the expiration of the
period of notice which shall be given by the state investment officer in writing not
less than thirty days in advance of withdrawal. The time deposit open account shall
be uniform and shall be furnished by the state investment officer with prior approval
of such form by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to each bank and
building and loan association for execution;
It is asked, "[e]ven with the passage of LB 932, can a depository bank, because of
their contract, stay in the TDOA program at a level below $300,000.00 until thejr maturity
date?" As we have concluded, existing time deposit open accounts having amounts less
than three hundred thousand dollars may be maintained consistent with statutory
requirements. The terms and conditions of the deposit contracts are necessarily consistent
with statutory requirements authorizing increments of one hundred thousand or fifty
thousand dollars. To the extent the provisions of existing agreements are inconsistent with
statutory provisions, the deposit accounts may be withdrawn upon thirty days notice, in
writing, prior to withdrawal by the state investment officer. Accordingly, existing accounts
with depository institutions may be maintained until maturity pursuant to the terms and
conditions of existing contracts entered into between the state investment officer and the
depository institutions.
Several similar questions are asked regarding application of contract provisions for
existing time open accounts. You inquire whether the "automatically renewable" provision
of existing agreements "mean that a participating bank can stay in the program indefinitely
at a lower level unless they withdraw on their own or until we withdraw them?" Of course,
the terms and conditions of a contract regarding renewal and/or duration are determined
by provisions of the agreement. A contract written in clear an unambiguous language is
not subject to interpretation or construction; rather, the intent of the parties must be
determined from the contents of the contract, and the contract must be enforced as to its
terms. McCormack v. Citibank, N.A. 100 F .3d 532 (8th Cir. 1996); Rayman v. American
Charter Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n, 75 F .3d 349 (8th Cir 1996); Home Federal
Savings and Loan Ass'n of Grand Island v. McDermott & Miller, 243 Neb. 136, 497
N.W.2d 678 (1993). Thus, the duration of deposit renewal periods is determined by the
provisions of existing contracts and the deposits may be maintained in accordance with the
provisions of the contract.
You also ask whether the state investment officer is required by law to notify
financial institutions with deposit accounts having less than S300,000.00 amounts to
"increase their deposit or withdrawal?" We do not believe that the state investment officer
has any duty to notify financial institutions to increase deposit amounts to $300,000.00.
Rex Holsapple, State Investment Officer
May 25,2000
Page 4
As we have concluded above, § 72-1263 as amended requires that the state investment
officer offer time deposit open accounts in the amount of three hundred thousand dollars
which may be accepted in one hundred thousand or fifty thousand dollar increments by
depository institutions. There is no mandatory language in the statute that requires a
financial institution to accept a minimum of three hundred thousand dollars in a time
deposit open account.
Ill.
RULES AND REGULATIONS
You have pointed out that the Nebraska Investment Council has promulgated rules
and regulations establishing procedures for distribution of funds to financial ins!itutions.
The text of the existing regulation addressing distribution of fund amounts :you have
submitted provides as follows:
Rule 1, Procedures for distribution of funds to banks and building and loan
associations, Sections 72-1261 to 72-1268 Nebraska statutes. 'T here shall be one
plan. The plan, in a minimum of $100,000.00 to the maximum of $500,000.00 in
increments of$1 00,000.00 will be offered to each bank and savings and association
for one year."
It is inquired, "[d]o we need to write a (sic) new Rules and Regulations for Nebraska
statutes, or can we leave Rule 1 as it is, with assurance that LB 932 fully overrides any
conflicting information between the two laws?" Review of the regulation reflects that its
provisions are inconsistent with underlying statutory requirements. Section 72-1263, as
amended, provides that the state investment officer shall offer a time open account in the
amount of three hundred thousand dollars to all financial institutions of this sate. Further,
the deposit may be accepted by financial institutions in increments of one hundred
thousand or fifty thousand dollars. The rule and regulation is necessarily amended to
conform with standards set forth in the statute.
The Investment Council exceeds its statutory authority by promulgating rules and
regulations at variance with standards set forth in the legislative act. Administrative
agencies have only that power which is granted to it by the Legislature, thus, its powers
are limited to those delineated by statute. Stoneman v. United Nebraska Bank, 254 Neb.
477, 577 N.W.2d 271 (1998); Jolly v. State, 252 Neb. 289, 562 N.W.2d 61 (1997).
Administrative agencies cannot use their rulemaking authority to modify, alter, or enlarge
provisions of a statute which it is charged with administering. Spencer By and Through
Spencerv. Omaha Public School Dist., 252 Neb. 750,566 N.W.2d 757 (1997); County
Cork, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Com'n, 250 Neb. 456, 550 N.W.2d 913 (1996).
Importantly, to be valid, a rule or regulation which an agency creates must be consistent
with the statute under which the rule or regulation was promulgated. Firs Tier Bank, N.A.
Rex Holsapple, State Investment Officer
May 26, 2000
Page 5
v. Department of Revenue, 254 Neb. 918, 580 N.W.2d 537 (1998); Robotham v. State,
241 Neb. 379, 488 N.W.2d 533 (1992). The Investment Council is required to adopt rules
and regulations to establish procedures for distribution of funds to depository institutions.
See, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 72-1266 (1996). Accordingly, the rule or regulation in its existing
form necessitates amendment consistent with statutory requirements.
IV.
REVIEW OF TIME OPEN DEPOSIT ACCOUNT CONTRACT
You have requested our review of a "new" contract for time deposit open accounts.
Generally, this office does not review contract or documents in the context of an opinion
of the Attorney General. We are providing you with our separate commentary regarding
contract provisions apart from this opinion.
·
· ·· · J
~ ~
Approved·
----... \
21..02-11
Sincerely,
DON STENBERG
Attorney General