UJI 14-2810B NMRA
UJI 14-2810B. Multiple conspiracies; distinct agreements.1
The Defendant[s] [__________, and ___________] [is]2 [are] charged in Counts
_______ and ________ with ______ separate conspiracies. Each of these Counts
requires a separate verdict and must be considered separately.
For you to find [the]2 [a] Defendant[s] guilty of one or more conspiracies, as charged
in Counts __________ and ___________, the State must prove to your satisfaction
beyond a reasonable doubt that [the]2 [a] Defendant entered into an agreement to
commit [one or more of] the crime[s] alleged in that specific count.
It is not enough to return a verdict of guilty on a particular count for you to find [the]2
[a] Defendant is guilty of some other conspiracy count or entered into some other
agreement to commit a crime not charged in that specific count of the indictment. Each
conspiracy count must be considered separately. Each verdict of guilty must be
supported by evidence—beyond a reasonable doubt—of a separate and distinct
agreement to commit the crime[s] alleged in that specific count and not a continuation of
Count ____ . Otherwise you must find the defendant not guilty of that count, regardless
of your verdict on other counts of the indictment.
If you conclude that [the]2 [a] Defendant conspired and agreed to commit more than
one (1) crime, to assist you in determining whether the defendant entered into two (2) or
more separate agreements with different criminal objects, or whether [the]2 [a]
Defendant entered into only a single conspiracy agreement to commit multiple crimes,
you may consider all the evidence [that I have admitted with regard to Count ___ and
Defendant[s] [________, and __________]3] and the totality of the circumstances.