Rule 28-301. Judicial evaluations.

In evaluating a judge's performance, the commission may consider utilizing any of the following: A. an analysis of a judge's results from the completed surveys prepared by either a private professional company experienced in social science and research or professionals from an institution of higher education located within this state with expertise in social science research; B. a review of judge's workload, conformance with judicial time standards, the number of excusals and recusals, cases pending and cases completed; C. any findings and recommendations of the Judicial Standards Commission and Supreme Court on extrajudicial conduct that reflected adversely on the judiciary; D. surveys made pursuant to these rules; E. observations; F. interviews; and G. any other information deemed appropriate by the commission.