UJI 13-1802C NMRA

UJI 13-1802C. Successive tortfeasor only defendant; no question for jury on divisibility of injuries.

Last amended: 2008Year: 2008Length: 131 wordsOfficial source
In this case, the plaintiff says and has the burden of proving by the greater weight of the evidence that _____________________ (one or more successive tortfeasors) caused injuries that were separate and distinct from, or that caused a measurable worsening of, injuries the plaintiff received from ___________________ (the original injury). In determining what damages, if any, were caused by _________________ (the successive tortfeasor or tortfeasors), you should award the plaintiff compensation only for [the separate injury caused by _________________ (the successive tortfeasor or tortfeasors)] [the measurable worsening of the plaintiff’s condition caused by _____________________ (the successive tortfeasor or tortfeasors)] [harm that would have been avoided had ____________________ (the successive tortfeasor or tortfeasors) [not been negligent][acted within the standard of care]], but not for damages from __________________________ (the first or original injury).
UJI 13-1802C NMRA: UJI 13-1802C. Successive tortfeasor only defendant; no question for jury on divisibility of injuries. | Justis AI