UJI 13-1827 NMRA
UJI 13-1827. Punitive damages.
(Introduction)
In this case, ________________________ (name of party making claim for punitive
damages) seeks to recover punitive damages from ________________________
(name of party against whom punitive damages are sought). You may consider punitive
damages only if you find that ________________________ (party making claim) should
recover compensatory [or nominal] damages.
(Theories of Liability)
[[1.]
If you find that the conduct of ________________________ (name of
party against whom direct liability for punitive damages is asserted) was [malicious],
[willful], [reckless], [wanton], [fraudulent] [or] [in bad faith], then you may award punitive
damages against that party.]
[[2.]
[Also] [I]f you find that the conduct of ________________________ (name
of agent or employee who was a tortfeasor) was [malicious], [willful], [reckless],
[wanton], [fraudulent] [or] [in bad faith], you may award punitive damages against
________________________ (name of principal or employer party against whom
liability for punitive damages is asserted) if:
(a)
________________________ (name of agent or employee) was acting [in
the] within scope of employment with ________________________ (name of principal
or employer party against whom liability for punitive damages is asserted) and had
sufficient discretionary or policy-making authority to speak and act for
_______________________ (name of principal or employer party against whom liability
for punitive damages is asserted) with regard to the conduct at issue, independently of
higher authority; [or if]
(b)
________________________ (name of principal or employer party
against whom liability for punitive damages is asserted) in some [other] way
[authorized,] [participated in] [or] [ratified] the conduct of ________________________
(name of agent or employee).]
[[3.]
If you find that the conduct of the ________ (agents or employees), taken
as a whole, showed that ___________________ (name of principal or employer against
whom liability for punitive damages is asserted) was [malicious] [willful] [reckless]
[wanton] [or] [in bad faith] you may award punitive damages against _______________
(name of principal or employer party).]
(Definitions)
Malicious conduct is the intentional doing of a wrongful act with knowledge that the
act was wrongful.
Willful conduct is the intentional doing of an act with knowledge that harm may
result.
Reckless conduct is the intentional doing of an act with utter indifference to the
consequences. When there is a high risk of danger, conduct that breaches the duty of
care is more likely to demonstrate recklessness.
Wanton conduct is the doing of an act with utter indifference to or conscious
disregard for a person’s [rights] [safety].
(Conclusion)
Punitive damages are awarded for the limited purposes of punishment and to deter
others from the commission of like offenses. The amount of punitive damages must be
based on reason and justice taking into account all the circumstances, including the
nature and enormity of the wrong and such aggravating and mitigating circumstances
as may be shown. The property or wealth of the defendant is a legitimate factor for your
consideration. The amount awarded, if any, must be reasonably related to the injury and
to any damages given as compensation and not disproportionate to the circumstances.