Rule 10-340 NMRA
Rule 10-340. Testimony of a child in an abuse or neglect proceeding.
A. Request to permit testimony by alternative method. The court may permit a
child witness to testify by an alternative method upon request of a party, a child witness,
or an individual determined by the court to have a sufficient connection to the child to
act on behalf of the child. A hearing on the request must be concluded on the record
after reasonable notice to all parties, any non-party requestor, and any other person the
court specifies. The child’s presence is not required at the hearing unless ordered by
the court. In conducting the hearing, the court is not bound by the Rules of Evidence
except the rules of privilege.
B. Alternative method. The court may allow a child witness to testify by an
alternative method if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that allowing
the child to testify by an alternative method is necessary to serve the best interests of
the child or enable the child to communicate with the court. In making this finding, the
court shall consider the following:
(1)
the nature of the hearing;
(2)
the age and maturity of the child;
(3)
the relationship of the child to the parties in the proceeding;
(4)
the nature and degree of mental or emotional harm that the child may
suffer in testifying; and
(5)
any other relevant factor.
C. Further considerations. If the court finds that the requirements of Paragraph B
of this rule have been met, the court shall consider
(1)
alternative methods reasonably available for protecting the interests of or
reducing mental or emotional harm to the child;
(2)
available means for protecting the interests of or reducing mental or
emotional harm to the child without resort to an alternative method;
(3)
the nature of the case;
(4)
the relative rights of the parties;
(5)
the importance of the proposed testimony of the child;
(6)
the nature and degree of mental or emotional harm that the child may
suffer if an alternative method is not used; and
(7)
any other relevant factor.
D. Ruling regarding testimony by alternative method. The alternative method
ordered by the court shall be no more restrictive of the rights of the parties than is
necessary under the circumstances to serve the purposes of the order. An order
allowing a child witness to testify by an alternative method shall set forth the court’s
findings and conclusions that support allowing the child to testify by an alternative
method, including findings that demonstrate that an alternative method is necessary to
serve the best interests of the child or enable the child to communicate with the court
and that the alternative method allowed by the court protects the rights of the parties in
light of the nature of the proceedings. An order allowing a child witness to testify by an
alternative method also shall
(1)
state the method by which the child is to testify;
(2)
list any individual or category of individuals allowed to be in, or required to
be excluded from, the presence of the child during the testimony;
(3)
state any special conditions necessary to facilitate a party’s right to
examine or cross-examine the child;
(4)
state any condition or limitation upon the participation of individuals
present during the testimony of the child; and
(5)
state any other condition necessary for taking or presenting the testimony.