N.M. Stat. § 45-2-507
Revocation by writing or by act.
A. A will or any part thereof is revoked:
(1)
by executing a subsequent will that revokes the previous will or part
expressly or by inconsistency;
(2)
by executing another subsequent document in the manner provided for in
Section 45-2-502 or 45-2-504 NMSA 1978, or both, that expressly revokes the previous
will or part thereof; or
(3)
by performing a revocatory act on the will if the testator performed the act
with the intent and for the purpose of revoking the will or part or if another individual
performed the act in the testator's conscious presence and by the testator's direction.
For purposes of this paragraph, "revocatory act on the will" includes burning, tearing,
canceling, obliterating or destroying the will or any part of it. A burning, tearing or
canceling is a "revocatory act on the will", whether or not the burn, tear or cancellation
touched any of the words on the will.
B. If a subsequent will does not expressly revoke a previous will, the execution of
the subsequent will wholly revokes the previous will by inconsistency if the testator
intended the subsequent will to replace rather than supplement the previous will.
C. The testator is presumed to have intended a subsequent will to replace rather
than supplement a previous will if the subsequent will makes a complete disposition of
the testator's estate. If this presumption arises and is not rebutted by clear and
convincing evidence, the previous will is revoked; only the subsequent will is operative
on the testator's death.
D. The testator is presumed to have intended a subsequent will to supplement
rather than replace a previous will if the subsequent will does not make a complete
disposition of the testator's estate. If this presumption arises and is not rebutted by clear
and convincing evidence, the subsequent will revokes the previous will only to the
extent that the subsequent will is inconsistent with the previous will; each will is fully
operative on the testator's death to the extent that the wills are not inconsistent.