1995-F3
View/download document
Cite as N.Y. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 1995-F3
NY CONST, ART I, § 9; ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW §§ 3-0113,
3-0301; GENERAL BUSINESS LAW § 369-e(1); L 1993, CH 57, § 78.
The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
may not undertake a promotional sweepstakes to promote
subscriptions to "The Conservationist" absent express statutory
authority to do so.
May 31, 1995
Hon. Michael D. Zagata
Formal Opinion
Commissioner
No. 95-F3
NYS Department of
Environmental Conservation
50 Wolf Road
Albany, NY 12233
Dear Commissioner Zagata:
Your counsel inquires whether the New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation (the "DEC") may participate in a
promotional sweepstakes program described hereafter. We conclude
that in the absence of express statutory authority, the DEC may
not do so.
To "promote a wider understanding of the problems affecting
conservation of natural resources", the DEC publishes, as its
official magazine, the "New York State Conservationist" ("The
Conservationist"), available to subscribers at an annual
subscription fee established by the Commissioner of the DEC,
after consultation with the State Division of the Budget
(Environmental Conservation Law § 3-0113; hereafter, "ECL"). DEC
staff advise that in order to encourage subscriptions and renewal
of subscriptions for "The Conservationist", the DEC proposes to
undertake a promotional sweepstakes. A person could enter by
subscribing to "The Conservationist". However, anyone could
enter without making any purchase or paying any fee or other
consideration. Prizes distributed by DEC to winners in the
sweepstakes will be donated to the DEC by private entities.
As outlined above, the promotional sweepstakes constitutes
the permissible use of a game and not a form of gambling
prohibited by Article I, section 9, of the New York State
Constitution except as otherwise provided therein. The DEC
sweepstakes does not constitute prohibited gambling because it
does not involve an element of gambling, the placing of a wager
in order to participate in the game. See generally, Op Atty Gen
(Inf) No. 86-27. An entrant would not have to pay any
consideration or make a purchase to participate in the DEC
sweepstakes. See generally, GBL § 369-e.
2
With respect to the donation to the DEC of sweepstakes
prizes by private entities, the ECL specifically authorizes the
DEC to acquire personal property by gift. ECL § 3-0301(2)(l).
However, it is a tenet of administrative law that an agency
such as the DEC possesses only those powers expressly conferred
by statute or implied powers essential to, and not merely
convenient to, the exercise of powers expressly conferred. City
of New York v Commission on Cable Television, 47 NY2d 89 (1979);
Lawrence Construction Corporation v State, 293 NY 634 (1944).
While undertaking a promotional sweepstakes may be a convenient
manner for DEC to increase subscriptions to "The Conservationist"
and thereby to promote awareness of conservation, under existing
authority we are constrained to conclude that it is not essential
to the function of promoting awareness of conservation.
In 1955 Op Atty Gen 181, this office opined that absent
express or implied power to do so, the predecessor of the DEC was
prohibited from selling advertising space in "The
Conservationist". By L of 1993, ch 57, § 78, the Legislature
enacted ECL § 3-0301(2)(y) allowing such sale. Likewise,
statutory provisions have been added to allow the DEC to
undertake other nonessential activities to promote DEC functions.
See, ECL § 3-0301(2)(t) (authority to sell prints of fish and
wildlife paintings) and 3-0301(2)(u) (authority to sell items
symbolic of contributions to DEC).
Thus, the raising of funds by the DEC to support programs
through advertising and sale of products specifically has been
authorized by the Legislature. It is apparent that these
activities have not been viewed as implied powers of the DEC.
Consistent with the foregoing opinion and statutes, neither can
the proposed sweepstakes be viewed as an implied power of the
DEC.
In sum, it is our opinion that the DEC may not undertake a
promotional sweepstakes to promote subscriptions to "The
Conservationist" absent express statutory authority to do so.
Very truly yours,
DENNIS C. VACCO
Attorney General