94-060
Dog and kennel fund moneys
Cite as 1994 Ohio Op. Att'y Gen. No. 94-060
OAG 94-060
Attorney General
2-292
OPINION NO. 94-060
Syllabus:
1.
A board of county commissioners has no (lllthority to use moneys
from the dog and kennel fund directly to pay the salary of a county
humane society agent for his service to the county humane society
as an agent of the society.
2.
Pursuant to R.C. 955.27, if there remains more than two thousand
dollars in the county dog and kell..nel fund, tlle board of county
commissioners may, at its December session, appropriate any part
of such surplus to a qualifying county humane society, which may
use such money to pay the salary of any of its agents or for any
other of its legitimate statutory purposes.
To: James J. Mayer, Jr., Richland County PrGsecuting Attorney, Mansfield,
Ohio
By: Lee Fisher, Attorney General, September 13,1994
You have submitted an opinion request in which you ask "whether a board of county
commissioners can hire an officer regularly employed by the humane society as a duly appointed
humane agent as part of the dog warden's staff, yet continuing the duties of a humane agent
pursuant to [R.C. Chapter 1717] but have his or her entire compensation paid from the dog and
kennel fund?" A member of your staff has indicated that the county commissioners propose
hiring a person currently employed as a county humane society agent and conferring upon that
agent the title of deputy county dog warden, even though the agent would continue to perform
only the duties of a county humane society agent and not those of a deputy county dog warden.
Because the county commissioners have no authority to hire a person to serve as a deputy county
dog warden but to perform none of the duties of that position, your question has been restated
to ask whether the county commissioners may use moneys from the dog and kennel fund directly
2-293
1994 Opinions
OAG 94-060
to pay the salary of a county humane society agent for his service to the county humane society
as a county humane society agent. 1
Authority of Board of County Commissioners
It is well settled that a board of county commissioners is a creature of statute and has
only those powers either expressly granted by statute or necessarily implied from its express
powers. State ex reI. Shriver v. Board of Commissioners, 148 Ohio St. 277, 74 N.E.2d 248
(1947). In State ex rei. Locher v. Menning, 95 Ohio St. 97,99, 115 N.E. 571, 571-72 (1916),
the court specifically addressed the authority of a board of county commissioners to expend
county funds:
The legal principle is settled in this state that county commissioners, in
their financial transactions, are invested only with limited powers, and that they
represent the county only in such transactions as they may be expressly authorized
so to do by statute. The authority to act in fmancial transactions must be clear
and distinctly granted, and, if such authority is of doubtful import, the doubt is
resolved against its exercise in all cases where a fInancial obligation is sought to
be imposed upon the county.
Thus, whether the board of county commissioners may pay the salary of an agent of the county
humane society from the dog and kennel fund for bis employment as a county humane society
agent depends upon whether any statute authorizes the board to take such action.
Dog and Kennel Fund
Pursuant to R.C. 955.19, " [a]11 funds received by the county dog warden orpounrlkeeper
in connection with the administration of [R.C. 955.01-.18] shall be deposited in the county
treasury and placed to the credit of the dog and kennel fund." R.C. 955.20, in part, prescri.bes
the permitted uses of the dog and kennel fund:
The registration fees provided for in [R.C. 955.01-.14] constitute a special
fund known as "the dog and kennel fund," which shall be deposited by the county
auditor ill the county treasury daily as collected, and be used for the purpose of
defraying the cost of furnishing all blanks, records, tags, nets, and other
equipment, for the purpose of paying the compensation of county dog wardens,
deputies, poundkeepers, and other employees necessaryi.O carry out and enforce
[R.C. 955.01-.261], and for the payment of animal claims as provided in [R.C.
955.29-.38], and in accordance with [R.C. 955.27].
The board of county
commissioners, by resolution, shall appropriate sufficient funds out of the dog and
kennel fund, not more than fIfteen per cent of which shall be expended by the
auditor for registration tags, blanks, records, and clerk hire, for the purpose of
defraying the necessary expenses of registering, seizing, impounding, and
destroying dogs in accordance with [R.C. 955.01-.27].
1933 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 338, vol. I, p. 360 concluded that the positions of county dog
warden and county humane society agent were not incompatible. It appears that in the situation
you describe, however, the county commissioners do not contemplate hiring a person who is an
agent of a county humane society to serve as the dog warden or a deputy, see R.C. 955.15, but
rather to use moneys from the dog and kennel fund to pay the salary of such an agent.
September 1994
1
GAG 94-060
Attorney General
2-294
Additional provision is made in R.C. 955.27 for the dispositiOiI of surplus in the dog and kennel
fund, as follows:
After paying all necessary expenses of administering the sections of the
Revised Code relating to the registration, seizing, impounding, and destroying of
dogs, including the purchase, construction, and repair of vehicles and facilities
necessary for the proper administration of sllch sections, making compen8auon
for injuries to livestock inflicted by dogs, and after paying all horse, sheep,
cattle, swine, mule and goat claims, the board of county commissioners, at the
December session, ifthere remains more than two thousand dollars in the dog and
kennel fund for such year in a county in whkh there is a society for the
pt,?;vention of cruelty to children and animals, incorporated and organized by law,
and having one or more agents appointed pursuant to law, or any other society
organized under [R. C. Chapter 1717] that owns or controls a suitable dog k~nnel
or a place for the keeping and destroying of dogs which has one or more agents
appointed and employed pursuant to law, may pay to the treasurer of such
society, upon warrant of the county auditor, all such excess as the board deems
necessary for the uses and purposes of such society.
Thus, the board of county commissioners is limited in the purposes for which it may spend the
moneys in the dog and kennel fund to those that are explessly prescribed by statute.
Authority of County Commissioners to Hire Persons for Animal Control
RC. 955.12 states in part: "The board of county commissioners shall appoint or employ
a county dog warden and deputies in such number, for such periods of time, and at such
compensation as the board considers necessary to enforce [R.C. 955.01-.27, RC. 955.~'.9-.38,
and RC. 955.50]." Pursuant to RC. 955.20, the salaries of the dog warden and his d.;.~/Uties
are paid from the dog and kennel fund.
Additional authority to hire personnel is set forth in RC. 955.15, which states in
pertinent part:
The board may designate and appoint any officers regularly employed by any
society organized under [R.C. 1717.02-.05 (including county humane societies)]
to act as county dog warden or deputies for the purpose of carrying out [R.C.
955.01-.27 and RC. 955.29-.38], if such society whose agents are so employed
owns or controls a suitable place for keeping and destroying dogs. (Emphasis
added.)
Pursuant to RC. 955.15, a board of county commissioners may, therefore, hire a county
humane society agent to perfonn many of the duties of the dog warden or a deputy warden.
County Humane Societie.;
R C. 1717.05 provides for the establishment of a county humane society "by the
association of not less than seven persons." After following the procedures prescribed by R.C.
1717.05 for the estahlishment of such a society, "the board of directors and the associates [of
the county human.e society], and their successors, shall have the powers, privileges, and
immunities incident to incorporated companies." R.C. 1717.05.
2-295
1994 Opinions
OAG 94-060
The appointment of county humane society agents is governed by RC. 1717.06, which
states in part:
A county humane society organi?ed under [R.C. 1717.05] may appoint
agents, who are residents of the county or municipal corporation for which the
appointment is made, for the purpose of prosecuting any person guilty of an act
of cruelty to persons or animals.
Such agents may arrest any person found
violating [R.C. 1717.01-.14], or any other law for protecting persons or animals
or .preventing acts of cruelty thereto ....
All appointments of agents under this section shall be approved by the
mayor of the municipal corporation for which they are made. Ifthe society exists
outside a municipal corporation, such appointments shall be approved by the
probate judge of the county for whith they are made.
Thus, a board of county commissioners has no authority to hire persons to serve as agents of
a county humane society.
The compensation of county humane society agents is governed by R. C. 1717.07, which
states:
Upon the approval by the mayor of a municipal corporation of the
appointment of an agent under [R. C. 1717.06], the legislative authority of such
municipal corporation shall pay monthly to such agent, from the general revenue
fund ofthe municipal corporation, such salary as the legislative authority deems
just and reasonable. Upon the approval by the probate judge of a county of such
an appointment, the board of county commissioners of such county shall pay
monthly to such agent,from the general revenue fund ofthe county, such salary
as the board deems just and reasonable. Such board and such legislative authority
may agree upon the amount each is to pay such agent monthly. The salary to be
paid monthly to such agent by the legislative authority of a village shall be not
less than five dollars; the legislative authority of a city, not less than twenty
dollars; and by the board of county commissioners of a county, not less than
twenty-five dollars. Not more than one such agent in each county shall receive
remuneration from the board under this section. (Emphasis added.)
Pursuant to this statute, county humane society agents who are appointed by a humane society
that exists out.,ide of a municipal corporation are entitled to receive compensation from the
general revenue fund of the county, but not from the county dog and kennel fund.
Payment of Salaries from Dog and Kennel Fund
The information providoo by a member of your staff indicates that the county
commissioners would like to use moneys from the dog and kennel fund directly to pay the salary
of a county humane society agent for his service to the county humane society as an agent of the
society. The authority of the county Commissioners to pay salaries from the county dog and
kennel fund, however, is limited to the payment of "compensation of county dog wardens,
deputies, poundkeepers, and other employees necessary to carry out and enforce [R.C. 955.01
.261]. nRC. 955.20. The position of county humane society agent is simply not one of the
positions enumerated in R.C. 955.20, the salary of which may be paid from the dog and kennel
fund. Although the duties of the county dog warden and his deputies, as prescribed by RC.
Chapter 955, are similar in some respects to those granted by R.C. Chapter 1717 to county
September 1994
OAG 94-061
Attorney General
2-296
humane society agents, the positions of county dog warden or deputy county dog warden and
county humane society agent are recognized to be distinct from one another in the statutes
themselves. Consequently, the board of county commissioners is without authority to use
moneys from the dog and kennel fund directly to pay the salary of a county humane society
agent for his service to the county humane society as a humane society agent.
Financial Assistance to County Humane Society
Although the board of county commissioners has no authority to use moneys from the
dog and kennel fund directly to pay the salary of a humane society agent for his service to the
county humane society as an agent of the society, the county may otherwise be able to provide
fmancial assistance to a county humane society from the dog and kennel fund. Pursuant to R.C.
955.27, if there remains more than two thousand dollars in the dog and kennel fund, the board
of county commissioners may, at the December session, appropriate "all such excess as the
board deems necessary for the uses and purposes of' a qualifying humane society. Ifthe county
commissioners were to appropriate moneys from the dog and kennel fund surplus to the county
humane society as permitted by RC. 955.27, the county humane society could use such moneys
to pay the salary of any of its agents or for any other of its legitimate statutory purposes. See
also RC. 1717.15 (permitting a board of county commissioners annually to appropriate moneys
to a county humane society from the general fund of the county "to be used to carry out the
activities of the society"). Thus, even though a board of county commissioners may not use
moneys from the dog and kennel fund directly to pay the salary of a county humane society
agent for his service to the humane society as one of its agents, the board may, as permitted by
RC. 1717.15 and R.C. 955.27, provide fInancial assistance to a qualifying county humane
society for the use of the society in carrying out any of its activities, which could include paying
the salary of any of its agents.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, it is my opinion, and you are hereby advised that:
1.
A board of county commissioners has no authority to usebloneys
from the dog and kennel fund directly to pay the salary of a county
humane society agent for his service to the county humane society
as an agent of the society.
2.
Pursuant to R.C. 955.27, ifthere remains more than two thousand
dollars in the county dog and kennel fund, the board of county
commissioners may, at its December session, appropriate any part
of such surplus to a qualifying county humane society, which may
use such money to pay the salary of any of its agents or for any
other of its legitimate statutory purposes.