OAC 252:690-7-1
Required WQSIP Elements
Cite as Okla. Admin. Code § 252:690-7-1
(a) Pursuant to 27A O.S. §1-1-202(B), each agency's WQSIP must include eight elements for each
of its jurisdictional areas of environmental responsibility. The eight required elements are:
(b) Compliance with antidegradation requirements and protection of beneficial uses. This
element describes the processes, procedures and methodologies utilized to ensure that programs
within jurisdictional areas of environmental responsibility comply with antidegradation standards
and lead to:
(1) Maintenance of water quality where beneficial uses are supported.
(2) Removal of threats to water quality where beneficial uses are in danger of not being
supported.
(3) Restoration of water quality where beneficial uses are not being supported.
(c) Application of USAP. This element describes the procedures to be utilized by the agency in
the application of USAP to make impairment determinations. USAP implementation criteria are
found at OAC 252:740. The procedure by which a DEQ program area utilizes USAP in making
waterbody beneficial use impairment determinations, or the manner in which USAP-derived
support/impairment information is utilized in program area functions is described. USAP studies
are spatial/temporal waterbody investigations utilizing established numerical criteria and/or
implementation guidelines to determine whether existing and designated beneficial uses are being
supported or not supported.
(d) Description of programs affecting water quality. This element describes the various agency
programs and subprograms within each jurisdictional area of environmental responsibility. A
program area is described in sufficient detail to convey the manner and process by which surface
WQS or groundwater protection implementation is achieved.
(d) Technical information and procedures for implementation. This element includes
technical information and procedures to be utilized in implementing the WQSIP. Technical
information, databases, software programs and operational procedures, be they of federal or
agency division/program area origin, that are utilized by a program area to implement the DEQ
WQSIP are described.
(f) Integration of WQSIP into water quality management activities. This element describes
how agency administrative rules, program area policies and guidance, and standardized methods
of conducting business have been or will be developed to facilitate integration of the WQSIP into
the water quality management activities within each jurisdictional area of environmental
responsibility.
45
(g) Compliance with mandated statewide water quality requirements. This element describes
the manner in which an agency will comply with mandated statewide requirements affecting water
quality developed by other state environmental agencies including, but not limited to, TMDL
development, point source wastewater discharge permitting activities, and NPS pollution
prevention programs. The manner in which a program area utilizes statewide requirements
affecting water quality is described in sufficient detail to demonstrate compliance with those
requirements.
(h) Public and interagency participation. This element requires a summary of written
comments and testimony received pursuant to all federal and state interagency reviews and public
meetings held by the state environmental agency, and the state environmental agency's response
thereto, for the purpose of providing public participation related to its WQSIP. This element
applies to both the initial WQSIP promulgation and revisions thereto.
(i) Evaluation of the effectiveness of agency activities. This element describes objective
methods and means to evaluate the effectiveness of activities conducted pursuant to an agency's
WQSIP in achieving WQS. BUMP and USAP assessments are the two primary means by which
the effectiveness of water quality management activities may be evaluated on a continuing basis.
Fish community biotrend monitoring and regulated activity self-monitoring provide additional
means of evaluating program effectiveness.
(1) BUMP. The OWRB's Beneficial Use Monitoring Program was created in 1998 at the
direction of the State Legislature. The program's monitoring is composed of five key elements,
as follows:
(A) Periodic river and stream monitoring, itself composed of two components:
(i) Monitoring at a series of fixed locations, determined by the OWRB in consultation
with other state environmental agencies.
(ii) Monitoring at a series of stations which rotate on an annual basis, the location and
monitoring parameters of which are based largely on the state's list of impaired
waterbodies (commonly referred to as the 303(d) list, established pursuant to Section
303(d) of the CWA).
(B) Fixed station load (flow) monitoring.
(C) Fixed station lakes monitoring.
(D) Fixed station groundwater monitoring.
(E) Intensive investigative sampling involving identified impaired waters, primarily for
the purpose of documenting the source of the impairment and determining appropriate
restorative actions.
(2) USAP. Waterbody impairment and restoration studies, field surveys, monitoring results,
or other available data will be assessed utilizing USAP.
(3) Fish community biotrends monitoring. This activity provides an additional biologically-
oriented measure of the effectiveness of water quality management activities. Together,
BUMP data, USAP studies and Fish Community Biotrends monitoring provide the best overall
measures of WQS compliance and beneficial use support.
(4) Regulated activity self-monitoring. Site-specific monitoring of surface waters and
groundwater outside the scope of BUMP and USAP is available to DEQ on a continuing basis
from the regulated community through its various regulatory programs.
(A) OPDES permits. Self-monitoring required by OPDES permits issued by the
Department. Continued compliance of point source dischargers in a waterbody segment
with their OPDES permit limitations, as assessed through self-monitoring, should correlate
46
with a waterbody's compliance with state WQS as assessed through BUMP and USAP
investigations. Likewise, self-monitoring of groundwater included in an OPDES permit is
useful for assessing groundwater quality management where surface impoundments and/or
land application are utilized.
(B) Land protection activities. Self-monitoring of surface waters and groundwater
required by solid waste, hazardous waste, underground injection and site remediation
regulatory activities yields valuable information for determining compliance with WQS
and the effectiveness of land protection activities.
(C) Water supplies. Self-monitoring of public and private water supplies (both surface
waters and groundwater) provides valuable information which may indicate present or
impending problems in the maintenance of, or success in the restoration of, the suitability
of those surface water supplies and groundwater sources for the public and private water
supply beneficial use.