No. 12
OFFICIAL OPINION No. 12
Cite as Pa. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 12 (1973)
OFFICIAL OPINION No. 12
Real Estate Commission-Rental listing agencies-Real estate broker
1. Rental listing agencies, which aRsemble lists of apartments and homes
for a rent, make them available for a fee, and extensively advertise the
availability of such housing, are practicing real estate brokerage within
the meaning of Section 2 (a) of the Real Estate Brokers License Act of
1929, 63 P .S. §432 (a) and must be licensed in accordance with Section 6
thereof, 63 P.S. §436.
Harrisburg, Pa.
January 25, 1973
Honorable Vincent J. Fumo
Commissioner
Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Dear Commissioner Fumo :
You have requested our opinion as to whether rental listing
agencies, several of which have recently appeared !n Pennsyl-
vania must be licensed as real estate brokers. Specifically, you
have 'referred to one such organization, in Philadelphia known
as "Homefinders."
26
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
It appears that these listing agencies assemble lists or apart-
ments or houses for rent and make them available for a fee to
those who wish to consult them. It appears that many of the
listings are simply taken from other ~lassified advertisements
in the newspapers and are often unavailable for rent when the
customer attempts to rent the apartment or house. The_ listing
agencies apparently do not enter int<;> any agreement. with the
owner or with the customer; they simply make available the
list to the customer. They receiv~ no commission. ~hen ~nd if
a lease is negotiated, nor do they m any way participa~e m the
actual consummation of a lease agreement. They receive only
the initial fee, usually in the amount of $2q.oo. The agencies
advertise extensively in the classified sect10n of the news-
papers.I
Section 2 of the Real Estate Brokers License Act of 1929, 63
P.S. §432 (a), contains the definition of a real estate broker.2
Section 6 of the Act, 63 P.S. §436, makes it unlawful for any
person to act as a real estate broker or in the capacity of a real
estate broker without first obtaining a license.
Other states which have faced the same question as that pre-
sented have held that the rental listing agency type of operation
(specifically, "Homefinders") is practicing real estate brokerage.
For example, the Attorney General of Delaware on October 16,
1972 rendered an official opinion holding that "Homefinders"
was operating illegally under Delaware law in that it was en-
gaged in the business of a real estate broker or salesman with-
out being registered and without a certificate of registration is-
1.
Sample advertisements are found both in the usual "For Rent" sections
or in sections headed "Apartment Services." They advertise listings of
apartments and homes generally and specifically (although no actual ad·
dresses are listed) and are generally indistinguishable from advertise·
ments by brokers and owners except for the statement of "Fee" or "$20.00
F ee." One such advertisement states: "Let the Largest Listing Co. in this
Area Get Your Next Home or Apartment."
2.
This section provides in pertinent part: "The term 'real estate broker'
shall include all persons, copartnerships, associations, and corporations,
foreign and domestic, who, for another and for a fee, commission, or other
valuable consideration, shall sell, exchange, purchase, or rent, or shall ne·
gotiate the sale, exchange, purchase, or rental, or shall offer or attempt
to negotiate the sale, exchange, purchase, or rental, or shall hold himself
or themselves out as engaged in the business of selling, exchanging, pur·
chasing or renting of any real estate, interest in real estate, the property
of another, whether the same shall be located within the State of Pennsyl·
vania, or elsewhere, or shall collect or offer or attempt to collect rental
for the use of real estate, the property of another, or shall negotiate or
offer or attempt to negotiate a loan, secured or to be secured by mortgage
or other encumbrance upon or transfer of any such real estate . .. One act
in consideration of compensation, by fee, commission or otherwise, of
buying, selling, renting or exchanging any such real estate of or for an·
other, or attempting of offering so to do, or negotiating a loan upon or
or leasing or renting or placing for rent any such real estate, or collect·
ion of rent therefrom, shall constitute prima facie evidence that the per·
son, copartnership, association, or corporation, so acting or attempting to
act, is a real estate broker within the meaning of this act."
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
27
sued by the Delaware Real Estate Commission. The Delaware
statute in question is similar to Pennsylvania's. Furthermore,
as the opinion of the Attorney General of Delaware points out,
an injunction was granted in Texas v. Homefinders of America,
Inc., No. 72-2559 (District Court of El Paso, Texas). In that
case, Homefinders was enjoined from holding out to the public
that it was engaged in the business of providing rental real
estate.
We are further advised that similar injunctions have been
granted in Florida at the behest of the Florida Real Estate Com-
mission. See Florida Real Estate Commission v. Sgro and
Homefinders of Florida, Case 71-24171 (Circuit Court of Dade
County); Florida Real Estate Commission v. Thompson t/a
Homefinders, Case No. 72-922 (Circuit Court of Duval County);
Florida Real Estate Commission v. Gorson and Garcia t/a Home
Rental Service, Case No. 72-1473 (Circuit Court of Broward
County).
We believe that Pennsylvania law is in accord. In the words
of the Real Estate Brokers License Act, note 2, supra, we be-
lieve that these rental listing agencies do " ... for another and
for a fee, commission, or other valuable consideration ... ne-
gotiate the ... rental, or . .. offer or attempt to negotiate the . ..
rental, or . .. hold ... themselves out as engaged in the business
of ... renting of any real estate, interest in real estate, the pro-
perty of another .... "
In Verona v. Schenley Farms Co., 312 Pa. 57, 167 A. 317
(1933), the Court held that a person who had brought to the
attention of a prospective buyer the attributes of another's
real property which eventually resulted in the consummation
of a sale was practicing real estate brokerage within the mean-
ing of the Act, and was therefore not entitled to collect the fee
which had been promised him because he was unlicensed. The
Court held that his activities, limited though they were, con-
stituted "negotiations" within the meaning of the Act. The
Court stated ( 312 Pa. at 61) :
"The Legislature was of course familiar with the great
variety of real estate brokerage contracts made from
time to time, and the definition of real estate broker
must be understood in the light of the common know-
ledge on the subject; some idea of the varied scope of
such contracts may be obtained by examining the cases
cited in [citations omitted]."
The Court further stated that the Act was intended to pre-
vent frauds upon the public and, therefore, even though it im-
poses penalties, it is not to be construc~ed st~ictly, but fair_ly
and liberally in order to carry out the mtent10n of the Legis-
lature. Verona was followed in Alford v. Raschiatore, 163 Pa.
Superior Ct. 635, 63 A. 2d 366 ( 1949) in which an individual
who "knew people" found someone interested in the seller's
land, brought the parties together, and a sale was consummated.
28
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Suit was brought for a commission promised and plaintiff ~on
tended that he had not been acting as a real estate broker smce
he did not pretend that he had "negoti,ated" any~hing but mere-
ly brought the parties to each others attention. T_he Court
nevertheless denied recovery, holding ( 163 Pa. Superior Ct. at
639):
"We cannot give to the word 'negotia~e,' in the sei;ise
intended by the Legislature, the strict construct10n
contended for by appellee. If we should so do, it would
preclude from the regulatory purpose of the Act a
great percentage of brokers and salesmen who norm-
ally do no more than acquaint prospective buyers and
sellers with the location and price of available proper-
ty, and who annually comply with the licensing feature
of the Act in the belief that they are covered by it."3
Similarly, in this case, the listing of the properties and mak-
ing such lists available for a fee has as its intention the bring-
ing of parties together in an amicable frame of mind to enter
into a lease. We further believe that where a person holds him-
self out as having rental listings much in the way that a real
Rstate broker usually does, that it was the intention of the Leg-
islature to include such person within the definition and sub-
ject him to appropriate regulation. It is therefore our opinion,
and you are so advised, that the activities carried on by the
various rental listing agencies constitute the practice of real
estate brokeraQ"e under the licensing act and require that they
be appropriately licensed. 4
In accordance with this opinion, we are prepared to take and
br ing injunctive action against any of these rental listing agen-
cies which are not licensed and which fail to become licensed
which you bring to our attention.
Sincerely yours,
GERALD GORNISH
Deputy Attorney General
ISRAEL p ACKEL
Attorney General
3.
The court cited with favor Baird v . K rancer, 138 Misc. 360, 246 N.Y.S. 85
( 1930 ) , where the Court sa id that the essentia l feature of broker's em-
ployr.1ent is to bring the parties together in an amica ble frame of mind
so that they may work out the terms of their a greement, but that it is of
no importance that the broker participate in working out that agreement.
4.
This opinion is not intended to cover the case of institutions which main-
tain housing lists for prospective students or ernployes, or lists ma inta in-
ed by non-profit orga niza tions for th~ benefit of members or interested
pa rties to. accomplish social goals, wh1c!1 do. not involve the payments of
fees. But 111 this case, where the _wo~~ - 1s. bemg done "for a fee, commis-
s10n, or other val~iabl~ cons1derat1on, 1t 1s clear that the practice of real
estate brokerage is bemg earned on.
OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
29