250-RICR-140-05-2
250-RICR-140-05-2. Solid Waste Regulations No. 2 Solid Waste Landfills (version Amendment, 03/21/2018 to 01/03/2021)
2.1 Solid Waste Landfills
2.1.1 General Information
A. In addition to meeting the
general requirements set forth in § 1.5 of this Subchapter, each
application for a license to construct and operate a landfill subject
to this rule must contain the following:
1. Engineering plans detailing
the proposed landfill's location of the property boundaries, adjacent
land uses and complete construction plans pursuant to § 2.1.2 of
this Part.
2. Operating plans pursuant to
§ 2.1.3 of this Part.
3. A sedimentation and erosion
control plan prepared in accordance with § 2.1.4 of this Part.
4. An engineering report
comprehensively describing the existing site conditions and an
analysis of the landfill, including closure and post closure
criteria, prepared in accordance with § 2.1.5 of this Part.
5. A quality assurance/quality
control report prepared in accordance with § 2.1.6 of this Part.
6. A contingency plan report
prepared in accordance with § 2.1.7 of this Part.
7. A hydrogeological report
and water quality monitoring plan prepared in accordance with the
provisions of § 2.1.8 of this Part.
8. A legal document certifying
acceptance of leachate by the operator of a wastewater treatment
facility for the discharge of leachate to that facility, if
applicable or, for on-site treatment and discharge of leachate, a
Rhode Island Pollution Discharge Elimination system permit.
9. A closure plan and
post-closure care plan prepared in accordance with § 2.1.9 of this
Part.
2.1.2 Engineering Plans
A. The engineering plans must
contain the following:
1. Locus Map: A copy of the
latest geologic survey map delineating the site boundaries, the
entire existing and proposed service area, as appropriate, and
indicating directions and distances to airports within fifteen (15)
miles of the landfill.
2. Radius Plan: A radius plan
including all the information listed below shall be submitted. The
radius plan must be drawn to an appropriate scale adjusted to fit on
a standard size sheet and including all areas within a one-half (1/2)
mile radius out from all property lines of the site. The required
information includes:
a. Zoning of the areas as
required by § 1.5(E)(5) of this Subchapter.
b. All buildings and dwellings
c. All water supplies (wells,
etc.)
d. All surface waters
including wetlands (with quality classifications)
e. All known principal and
primary water supply aquifers (with quality classifications)
f. All roads, bridges,
railroads, airports, and historic sites.
g. All boring locations
h. Legal boundaries of site
certified by a Registered Land Surveyor in the State of Rhode Island
i. North arrow
j. Extent of 100 year flood
plain (where applicable)
k. All other existing and
proposed non-made or natural features relating to the facility
l. Legend
3. Site Plan: A site plan
including all of the information listed below for all areas within
the site shall be submitted. The site plans must be drawn to an
appropriate scale adjusted to fit on a standard size sheet. The
required information includes:
a. Initial ground contours at
five-foot intervals
b. Final proposed contours at
five-foot intervals
c. Boring locations,
excavations and test pits
d. The location and placement
of each liner system
e. The location and placement
of each leachate collection system showing all critical grades and
elevations of the collection pipe inverts and drainage envelopes,
manholes, cleanouts, valves, sumps, and pumps if necessary
f. Proposed gas controls,
wells, header pipes, vents and flares (if any)
g. Buildings
h. Water supply wells (if any)
i. Surface water courses (if
any)
j. Roads
k. Cross section lines (see §
2.1.2(D) of this Part)
l. Areas to be used for
storing salvaged materials and recycled materials
m. Areas to be used for
special waste as listed in § 2.3.6(D) of this Part
n. Groundwater monitoring
wells
o. Legal boundaries of the
site certified by a Registered Land Surveyor in the State of Rhode
Island
p. Power lines, pipe lines,
rights of way and other utilities
q. Proposed fences
r. Weighing facilities
s. North arrow
t. Location of borrow areas
u. Boundaries of areas to be
filled including planned stage development of the landfill's
construction and operation.
v. Benchmarks and permanent
survey markers
w. Lateral and vertical limits
of previously filled areas (if any)
x. A wind rose
y. Berms, dikes, ditches,
sedimentation ponds, swales and other devices as needed to control or
collect surface water run-on and run-off
z. Location and details of
leachate storage, treatment and disposal systems
aa. Typical roadway sections
and profiles (for paved roadways)
bb. Legend
4. Cross Sections: Typical
cross section plans including all the information listed below shall
be submitted. A minimum of two cross sections will be required of
right angled center lines passing through the approximate middle of
the site. The cross section plans should be drawn at appropriate
horizontal and vertical scales. The required information includes:
a. Proposed lifts
b. Virgin ground
c. Maximum groundwater table
d. Bedrock location
e. Side slopes
f. Details of surface drains
and ditches
g. Final fill elevations and
grades
h. Limits of excavations
i. Final cover details &
elevations
j. Details on access road
construction
k. Details of the liner system
l. Details of leachate
collection systems
m. Details of gas management
facilities
n. Details of groundwater
monitoring wells
5. Airport Safety: An owner or
operator applying to site a new SWLF unit and/or a lateral expansion
of a SWLF unit within a five-mile radius of any airport runway end
used by turbojet or piston-type aircraft must notify the affected
airport and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of this
application and show proof to the Director of this notification.
2.1.3 Operating Plan
A. An operating plan shall be
submitted including information on all of the areas listed below. The
duration of the operating plan shall equal that of the license. The
operating plan shall be reviewed by the applicant prior to the
license renewal and any changes to such plan shall be submitted to
the Department for approval at that time.
B. The applicant must
demonstrate an ability to comply with all General Operating Standards
and with the Sanitary Landfill Operating Standards listed in § 1.7
of this Subchapter and § 2.3 of this Part, respectively. The
following information shall be included in the plan:
1. Type of landfill method to
be used (trench, area, etc.)
2. Proposed sequence of
filling operation
3. Fire control and prevention
provisions
4. Operating hours
5. All types of refuse to be
accepted with corresponding approximate percentages of the total
refuse
6. Personnel and duties,
including a description of all personnel that will receive training
in order to become knowledgeable of the procedure, equipment, and
process at the facility, relative to the position in which they are
employed
7. Projected use of completed
site
8. Dust control program
9. Vector control program
10. Litter control program
11. Odor control program
12. Procedures to promote
vegetative growth on completed areas
13. Equipment to be on site
during operating hours
14. Substitute equipment
arrangement
15. Communications equipment
available
16. Population and service
area
17. Winter operations
18. Provisions for limited
access
19. Weighing facilities
20. Estimated life of landfill
21. Salvaging operations and
handling procedures for source segregated recyclable materials or
other recyclables to be stored for recycling
22. Handling procedures for
special wastes as listed in § 1.7(E) of this Subchapter and §
2.3.6(D) of this Part and procedures for SWLF units to exclude
regulated hazardous wastes and PCB wastes, per § 2.3.6(E) of this
Part.
23. Leachate collection
removal and disposal operations and schedule
24. Leachate treatment
operations (if any)
25. Groundwater monitoring
operations and schedule
26. Air monitoring operation
and schedule including gas monitoring program
27. Surface drainage control
methods
28. If applicable, a
description of the operation of a convenience station at the landfill
for smaller private vehicles to unload refuse at an area other than
the landfill's working face
29. Outline of the records to
be kept, location of records, and retention period of records.
2.1.4 Sedimentation and
Erosion Control Plan
A. A sedimentation and erosion
control plan including all of the information listed below for all
areas within the site shall be submitted. The sedimentation and
erosion control plan must be drawn to an appropriate scale adjusted
to fit on a standard size sheet. The required information includes:
1. The identification of all
areas of disturbed, erodible, non-vegetated, non-stable soils.
2. The identification of all
planned activity areas which could result in erosion due to unstable
soil conditions.
3. The definitive, specific
location for temporary sediment and erosion control installation.
4. The types of temporary
sediment and erosion controls to be utilized. Such controls must be
able to withstand all expected velocities from site flows under
anticipated storm events and must be capable under such conditions to
retain eroded soils with maximum stability and efficiency.
5. The method of temporary
sediment and erosion control installation, including the time of
installation.
6. The method and schedule of
maintenance, modification, enforcement, and replacement of temporary
sediment and erosion controls based upon operations and existing or
anticipated erosion problems, including on-site and off-site borrow
areas and any other areas that may be disturbed by landfill
operations.
7. The means and method of
sediment removal collected within or behind any controls, including
anticipated time periods between removal.
8. Existing vegetation to be
retained.
9. Proposed vegetation to be
used for cover, screening and other purposes.
10. Seeding and planting
schedule that accounts for the various stages of landfill development
(construction, operation and closure).
11. Seed mixture choice,
fertilization procedures and procedures for seed application
(identify seasonal limitations, as appropriate), mulching and
maintenance.
12. Planting plan and schedule
(which must identify plants to be used consistent with future use
proposals).
13. A schedule of cutting and
clearing of existing vegetation so as to maintain the maximum natural
area at all times.
2.1.5 Engineering Report
A. An engineering report
containing a description of the existing site conditions and an
analysis of the proposed landfill in accordance with the construction
standards of § 2.2 of this Part shall be submitted. The following
information shall be included in the report:
1. The proposed design
capacity of the landfill for which approval is being sought,
expressed in tons per day.
2. An analysis of the existing
topography, surface water and subsurface geological conditions in
accordance with the requirements of § 2.1.8 of this Part.
3. A description of the
materials and construction methods used for the placement of the
following:
a. Groundwater monitoring
wells
b. Gas venting system
c. Each liner and leachate
collection and removal system
d. Leachate storage treatment
and disposal system
e. Cover system
f. This description must
demonstrate conformance with the construction requirements found in §
2.2 of this Part, and must include a discussion of provisions to be
taken to prevent frost action upon each liner system in areas where
refuse has not been placed.
4. An estimate of the expected
quantity of leachate to be generated, including:
a. An annual water budget that
must estimate leachate generation quantities during initial
operation, upon application of intermediate cover and following
facility closure. At a minimum, the following factors must be
considered:
(1) Average monthly
temperature
(2) Average monthly
precipitation
(3) Evaporation
(4) Evapotranspiration
(5) Surface/cover soil
conditions
(6) All other sources of
moisture contribution to the landfill
(7) Guidance for leachate
calculations may utilize National Weather Service data for
Providence, RI, United States Department of Agriculture Climate Data
for Providence, RI and USDA, Soil Conservation Service for Rhode
Island soil data.
b. Liner and leachate
collection system efficiencies that must be calculated using an
appropriate analytical or numerical assessment. At a minimum, the
factors to be considered must include:
(1) The saturated hydraulic
conductivity of the liner
(2) The liner thickness
(3) The saturated hydraulic
conductivity of the leachate collection system
(4) The leachate collection
system porosity
(5) The base slope of the
liner and leachate collection and removal system interface
(6) The maximum flow distance
across the liner and leachate collection and removal system interface
to the nearest leachate collection pipe
(7) The estimated leachate
generation quantity as computed in accordance with the requirements
of § 2.1.5(D)(1) of this Part.
c. Predictions of the static
head of leachate on the liners, volume of leachate to be collected,
and the volume of leachate that may permeate through the entire liner
system, all on a monthly basis. Information gained from the
collection efficiency calculations required in §§ 2.1.5(D)(1) and
(2) of this Part must be used to make these predictions. This
assessment also must address the amount of leachate expected to be
found in the secondary leachate collection and removal system in
gallons per acre per day (the "action leakage rate").
5. Design of a leachate
storage facility, if necessary. The storage facility's capacity must
be based upon the leachate generation calculation required in §
2.1.5(D) of this Part. The design capacity for the leachate storage
facility must be based on the proposed leachate disposal method that
must allow sufficient lead time for either:
a. Approval for the
construction and operation of an on-site leachate treatment facility
or
b. Approval to handle leachate
destined for off-site treatment at a wastewater treatment facility.
6. A description of the
contingency plan for the construction phase. This plan must describe
procedures for responding to construction deficiencies resulting from
circumstances including, but not limited to, inclement weather and
defective materials or construction inconsistent with specifications
as demonstrated by quality control testing. The plan must:
a. Provide a description of
the criteria to be utilized in evaluating deficiencies
b. Select and implement
corrective actions
c. Discuss the closure and
post-closure maintenance and operation of the landfill which must
include, but not be limited to:
(1) A closure design
consistent with the requirements of §§ 2.1.9 and 2.2.12 of this
Part.
(2) A post-closure water
quality monitoring program consistent with § 2.1.9 of this Part.
(3) An operation and closure
plan for the leachate collection, treatment, and storage facilities
(4) A discussion of the future
use of the site, including the specific proposed or alternative uses.
Future uses must conform to the sedimentation and erosion control
plan, required pursuant to § 2.1.4 of this Part, and must not
adversely affect the final cover system.
7. A description of the daily
and intermediate cover material, including a sieve analysis,
performed by a competent soil testing agency. An estimation of the
amount (in cubic yards) of cover material available and the source
will also be required. If the cover material is to be purchased, a
letter from the vendor stating the amounts which can be supplied must
also be submitted.
8. A description of procedures
and precautions to be taken during the placement of the first lift of
waste above the liner and leachate collection system, describing the
selected solid waste and its placement, approach and operation of
collection vehicles and compaction equipment, with concern for
minimizing adverse impacts on the liner and leachate collection
system.
2.1.6 Quality
Assurance/Quality Control Report
A. The project's Quality
Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) report must address the
construction requirements set forth in § 2.2 of this Part for each
specified phase of construction. This plan must include, but not be
limited to:
1. A delineation of the QA and
QC management structures, including the chain of command of the QA
and QC inspectors, and describing the quality control and corrective
action implementation responsibilities of the QA and QC inspectors
and the contractors.
2. A description of the
required level of experience for the contractor and his crew for
every major phase of construction which shall be sufficient to ensure
that the installation methods and procedures as required per § 2.2
of this Part are properly implemented.
3. A description of the
required level of experience of the QA and QC inspectors for every
major phase of construction to ensure that the QA and QC testing is
properly implemented.
4. A description of the
required level of training, if necessary, to be provided for the
contractor's personnel and the inspectors, to ensure that the
installation methods and procedures and the contingency methods are
properly implemented and that corrective action will be properly
employed, when necessary.
5. A description of the QA and
QC testing and inspections for every major phase of construction,
which shall include but not be limited to the following:
a. The frequency of
inspections
b. The frequency of field
testing
c. The frequency of sampling
for laboratory testing
d. The sampling and field
testing procedures to be utilized
e. The sampling and field
testing equipment to be utilized
f. The calibration of field
testing equipment
g. The frequency of system or
performance audits
h. The sampling size
i. The soils or geotechnical
laboratory to be used
j. The laboratory procedures
to be utilized
k. The calibration of
laboratory equipment and QA/QC of laboratory procedures
l. The limits for test failure
m. The description of the
corrective procedures to be used upon test failure
2.1.7 Contingency Plan
A. The contingency plan must
discuss an organized, planned and coordinated, technically and
financially feasible course of action to be taken in responding to
contingencies during the construction and operation of a landfill.
The plan must address, at a minimum:
1. Actions to be taken with
respect to personnel and user safety
2. On-site personal injury
3. Fires
4. Explosive landfill gases
detected on site
5. Equipment breakdown
6. Unusual traffic conditions
7. Deposition or receipt of
waste not authorized by the Department to be disposed of at the
facility
8. Releases of hazardous or
toxic materials
9. Groundwater and surface
water contamination including public and private water supply
contamination
10. Presence of leachate in
the secondary leachate collection and removal system, including:
a. Establishing limits for
Action Leakage Rates (ALR) and Rapid and Large Leakages (RLL)
b. Description of Response
Action Plan (RAP) if ALR and RLL are exceeded
11. The leachate storage
facility being at or above capacity
12. Leachate tank and surface
impoundment spills or leakage (including removal of the waste and
repair of such structures)
13. The inability of the
approved leachate treatment facility to accept leachate from the
landfill for an indefinite period of time.
2.1.8 Hydrogeological
Report
A. The hydrogeologic report
must define the landfill site geology and hydrology and relate these
factors to regional and local hydrogeologic patterns; provide a
three-dimensional understanding of groundwater and surface water flow
at the site sufficient to determine the ultimate suitability of the
site for landfilling; establish an environmental monitoring system
capable of readily detecting a contaminant release from the facility
and determining whether the site is contaminating surface or
subsurface waters; and form the basis for design of the facility and
contingency plans relating to ground or surface water contamination
or gas migration. The hydrogeologic report for a new landfill, and
for a lateral expansion of an existing landfill, must contain a site
investigation plan, a site investigation report, and an environmental
monitoring plan.
B. Requirements of the Site
Investigation Plan: The site investigation plan must clearly define
all methods to be used in investigating the hydrogeologic conditions
of the site, the scope of the intended investigation, and any
specific hydrogeologic questions that the investigation is designed
to address. The applicant is strongly encouraged to develop a draft
version of the plan for review with the Department before starting
the hydrogeologic investigation, and to keep the Department informed
of the findings and subsequent investigative proposals as the study
proceeds. The final version of the plan included in the hydrogeologic
report section of the license application must fully describe all
methods of investigation used. The plan must comply with the
following:
1. General requirements for
all methods used - In obtaining the required hydrogeologic
information, the applicant must employ current, standard, and
generally accepted procedures in meeting the requirements of this
Section. Unless otherwise approved by the Department, all work must
be done in accordance with applicable American Society for Testing
Materials standards or current and appropriate U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency guidance documents. Alternative or innovative
methodologies may be approved by the Department. All procedures must
be conducted under the supervision of a geologist, hydrogeologist, or
geotechnical engineer having experience in similar hydrogeologic
investigations, in a manner that ensures accuracy of the data and
precludes environmental degradation. The location of all
installations, geophysical and geochemical surveys, and seismic lines
must be shown on a map with the same scale and coordinate grid system
used on the engineering plans.
2. Literature search - A
comprehensive search must be made for pertinent and reliable existing
information concerning regional and site-specific hydrogeologic
conditions. The literature search must include, as available, records
and reports of the U.S. Soil Conservation Service; basin planning
reports, water table maps, geologic bulletins, water supply papers,
professional papers and other reports of the U.S. Geological Survey;
publications and bulletins of the Geological Society of America and
other professional organizations; and publications of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency and Department, college and
university reports; and aerial photography or remotely sensed
imagery.
3. Surficial geologic mapping
- The site must be mapped to determine the distribution of surficial
deposits on and surrounding the site based upon existing information,
field evaluations, and field confirmation of all interpretations made
on the site itself.
4. Water well surveys - A
survey of public wells within three miles of the site and private
water wells within one mile downgradient and one-quarter mile
upgradient of the proposed site must be conducted. An alternative
distance may be agreed upon by the Director. Surveys must obtain,
where available, the location of wells, which must be shown on a map
with their elevation and depth, name of owner, age and usage of the
well; geologic unit screened; well construction; static water levels;
well yield; actual or perceived water quality; and any other relevant
data which can be obtained.
5. Fracture trace analysis -
The Department may require the use of fracture trace analysis to
identify potential pathways of groundwater and contaminant migration.
6. Geophysical and geochemical
surveys - The Department may require the use of geophysical and
geochemical methods, such as electromagnetic resistivity, seismic
surveys, and soil gas analysis, to justify the interpretations and
conclusions of the site investigation report, and to provide
information between boreholes and aid in the siting of wells.
7. Tracer studies - The
Department may require the use of tracer studies to aid in
understanding groundwater flow and potential contaminant transport,
or to otherwise assist in devising an effective environmental
monitoring plan.
8. Monitoring wells and
piezometers
a. Construction in general
(1) Monitoring wells and
piezometers must define the three-dimensional flow system within the
aquifer to justify the interpretations and conclusions of the
hydrogeologic report. For all landfill units, monitoring wells must
be installed at appropriate locations and depths to yield groundwater
samples from the uppermost aquifer.
(2) Construction techniques
must be appropriate to ensure that groundwater samples and head level
measurements characterize discrete stratigraphic intervals; and to
prevent leakage of groundwater or contaminants along the well
annulus. If leakage is detected, it must be corrected or the well
must be abandoned.
(3) Monitoring wells and
piezometers may be placed individually or as well clusters. Well
clusters consist of individual wells at varying depths in close
proximity, each installed in its own boring. Multiple wells placed
into one large borehole are prohibited unless Department approval is
obtained.
(4) Soil borings, soil
samples, and rock cores must characterize each geologic unit within
the aquifer to justify the interpretations and conclusions of the
hydrogeologic report.
(5) Every appropriate
precaution must be taken during drilling and construction of
monitoring wells to avoid introducing contaminants into a borehole.
Only potable water may be used in drilling monitoring wells or
piezometers.
(6) All equipment to be placed
into the boring must be properly decontaminated before use at the
site and between boreholes. The initial cleaning at the site must be
sufficient to ensure that no contaminants from the last site drilled
will be introduced into the borings. All equipment must be steam
cleaned between holes. Upgradient wells should be drilled first.
b. Construction of monitoring
wells and piezometers.
(1) Well casing: All permanent
groundwater monitoring wells shall be constructed of PVC well casing
material. All casing shall have a minimum inside diameter of 2.0
inches. Monitoring wells constructed in unconsolidated material less
than 100 feet in depth shall be constructed using a minimum of
schedule 40 PVC. Wells greater than 100 feet shall be constructed
using a minimum of schedule 80 PVC. Assembly and installation: All
casing shall be constructed of flush threaded joints or threaded
coupling joints. All joints shall be fitted with an "O"
ring or wrapped with teflon tape. Solvent welded joints are not
permissible without prior written permission of the Director.
Exceptions: The Director may allow alternate well casing material if
the containment concentrations or geologic setting require an
alternative construction. Alternative materials include but are not
limited to:
(AA) teflon,
(BB) stainless steel, or
(CC) uncoated or galvanized
steel.
(2) Well screen: The well
screen slot size shall be sized to retain at least 90 percent of the
grain size of a filter pack or at least 60 percent of the grain size
of the collapsed formation. Well screens on water table wells shall
not exceed 15 feet in length. Well screens for piezometers shall not
exceed five feet in length. Well screens shall be factory slotted. A
bottom cap and sump sediment trap shall be installed. Water table
variations, site stratigraphy, expected contaminant behavior, and
groundwater flow must be considered in determining the screen length,
materials, and position. Where existing contamination is suspected or
known, down hole geophysical techniques may be required by the
Department to aid in selecting well screen elevations.
(3) Filter pack: The filter
pack shall be chemically inert, well rounded and well sorted glass
beads or silica based sand or gravel of uniform grain size. The
filter pack must minimize the amount of fine material entering the
well, and it must not inhibit the flow of water into the well. The
filter pack shall extend no more than five feet above the well
screen. The filter pack shall not contaminate groundwater.
(4) Sealing requirements:
(AA) Filter pack seal: All
monitoring wells installed with a filter pack shall be constructed
with a top of filter pack seal.
(BB) Annular space seal: All
monitoring wells shall be installed with an annular space seal that
has a permeability of 1 x 10 -7 centimeters per second or
less.
(CC) Ground surface seal: All
monitoring wells shall be constructed with a continuous pour concrete
ground surface seal. The ground surface seal shall extend to a
minimum of 40 inches below the land surface and shall be flared such
that the diameter at the top is greater than the diameter at the
bottom. The top of the ground surface seal shall be sloped away from
the well casing, and shall be imprinted with the designation of the
monitoring well.
(5) Protective cover pipe: The
protective pipe shall consist of a minimum 4 inch diameter metal
casing with locking cap. The protective pipe shall extend from the
bottom of the ground surface seal to a minimum of 24 inches above the
land surface. There shall be no more than 4 inches between the top of
the well casing and the top of the protective pipe. The monitoring
well designation shall be indicated clearly on the protective cover
pipe. A gas vent shall be installed. A high visibility guard post to
prevent destruction of the well may be required. The Director may
request additional protective devices as necessary. "Road boxes"
will be acceptable in locations where protective cover pipes are not
stable. All road boxes shall be locking and air tight.
(6) Where under the
circumstances of a particular situation the Department believes that
the methods identified in this section are inadequate, it may require
additional measures to be taken to prevent migration of contaminants
along the well annulus or to otherwise protect the well.
(7) Alternative construction
methods for piezometers may be approved by the Department if those
methods meet the requirements set forth in this Part.
c. Well and piezometer
development - Development of all monitoring wells and piezometers
shall be performed no earlier than 24 hours after installation and
before the initial water quality samples are taken. The goal of well
development is to produce water free of fine sand and coarser
material, all drill cuttings and drilling fluids.
(1) Survey - The locations and
elevations of all existing and abandoned test pits, soil borings,
monitoring wells, and piezometers must be surveyed to obtain their
precise location and plotted on a map in the hydrogeologic report.
The vertical location of the ground surface and the mark made on the
top of the monitoring well and piezometer risers must be accurately
measured to the nearest one hundredth foot.
(2) Where a well is damaged,
or for any other reason cannot be sampled, the Department must be
notified in writing no later than 15 days after discovery of the
situation.
(3) Replacement of wells - All
wells must be properly protected to ensure their integrity. If in the
opinion of the Department, water quality or other data show that the
integrity of a well is lost, the well must be replaced and sampled
within a time period acceptable to the Department after written
notification by the Department.
(4) Abandonment of wells - All
soil borings or rock cores which are not completed as monitoring
wells or piezometers, and other abandoned wells, must be fully sealed
in a manner appropriate for the geologic conditions in order to
prevent contaminant migration through the borehole.
(5) Abandonment procedures -
The well shall be checked from the land surface through the entire
depth of the well before it is sealed to ensure against the presence
of any obstructions that will interfere with sealing operations.
(AA) Wells constructed with an
annular seal shall be abandoned by cutting off the casing a minimum
of 4 feet below land surface. The remaining casing shall be
completely filled with a neat cement grout or bentonite-cement grout.
(BB) Wells not known to be
constructed with an impermeable annular seal shall be abandoned by
completely removing the well casing and sealing with neat cement or
bentonite-cement grout. If the casing cannot be removed during the
abandonment of a well, the casing shall be thoroughly ripped or
perforated from top to bottom, except that perforations will not be
required over intervals of the well that are sealed with cement. The
screened portion of the well and the annular space between the casing
and the drillhole wall shall be effectively and completely filled
with cement or bentonite-cement grout applied under pressure.
(6) The owner or operator of a
SWLF unit must notify the Director that the documentation of the
development and decommissioning of any monitoring wells and
piezometers has been placed in the landfill's operating record.
9. Geologic sampling - A
representative number of borings and rock cores must be sampled
continuously throughout the length of the hole. In any additional
borings not continuously sampled, samples must be taken at five (5)
foot intervals in unconsolidated deposits and, in rock, as required
by the Department. For well clusters, continuous samples must be
collected from the surface to the base of the deepest well. Other
wells in the cluster must be sampled at all stratigraphic changes,
and at the screened interval. Soil borings must be sampled using the
split spoon method and bedrock or boulders must be sampled by coring
with standard size NX or larger diameter core bits. Samples must be
retained in labeled glass jars or wooden core boxes. Core samples
must be securely stored and accessible throughout the life of the
facility. Unconsolidated samples must be retained for three years
after the permit is issued. The proposed location of the storage area
must be designated in the operation and maintenance plan for the
facility.
10. Logs
a. Complete and accurate
drilling logs must be provided to the Department for all soil
borings. These logs must provide detailed soil classification. Logs
also must contain a description of matrix and clasts, mineralogy,
roundness, color, appearance, odor, and behavior of materials using
an appropriate descriptive system. A clear description of the system
used must be included with the logs. When undisturbed samples have
been taken, the interval tested and the test results must be clearly
shown on the logs. All well logs must contain drilling information as
observed in the field including: moisture content, location of the
water table during drilling, water loss during drilling, depth to
significant changes in material and rock, sample recovery measured in
tenths of a foot, hammer blow counts, and other pertinent comments,
the method of drilling, anomalous features such as gas in the well,
and the use and description of drilling fluids or additives,
including the source and calculated and actual amounts of materials
used.
b. Rock core logs must
describe the lithology, mineralogy, degree of cementation, color,
grain size, and any other physical characteristics of the rock,
percent recovery and the rock quality designation (RQD), other
primary and secondary features, and contain all drilling observations
and appropriate details required for soil boring logs. A clear
photographic record of all labeled cores must also be taken and
submitted with the logs.
c. Well completion logs must
contain a diagram of the completed well, all pertinent details on
well construction, a description of materials used and elevations of
all well features. The owner or operator of a SWLF unit must notify
the Director that the documentation of the design and installation of
any monitoring wells and piezometers, has been placed in the
landfill's operating record.
d. For a SWLF unit, there
shall be either a certified statement from a qualified groundwater
scientist or approval by the Director of the number, spacing, and
depths of the installed groundwater monitoring wells. If there is a
certified statement from a qualified groundwater scientist,
concerning this matter, then the owner or operator of the SWLF unit
shall notify the Director, within fourteen (14) days of this
certification, that the certified statement has been placed in the
landfill's operating record.
11. Water quality sampling and
analysis - Water quality samples, low in turbidity, must be collected
by personnel trained in sample collection methods and fully informed
of the sampling techniques specified in the site investigation and
environmental monitoring plans. These plans must specify: how samples
will be collected and preserved; chain of custody documentation;
analyses required; methods of analyses; and quality control/quality
assurance protocols. All methods must be acceptable to the
Department. A record of the methods employed and the personnel
involved must be kept and reported to the Department with the
analytical data. The owner or operator of a SWLF unit must notify the
Director that the documentation of these sampling and analytical
devices and procedures has been placed in the landfill's operating
record.
a. Monitoring well sampling
techniques must be consistently performed each time a well is
sampled, and must comply with the following:
(1) In areas where the
presence of explosive or organic vapors as suspected, ambient air in
the well must be checked for their presence before the well is
evacuated. In addition, before evacuation of the well, static water
level must be measured to the nearest one-hundredth of a foot using
standard techniques; and for wells with documented contamination,
where contamination by non-aqueous phase liquids may be present,
standing water in the well must be checked for immiscible layers or
other contaminants that are lighter or heavier than water (floaters
or sinkers). If present, floaters or sinkers must be sampled and
analyzed separately by a method described in the site investigation
plan.
(2) Evacuation of the well
must replace stagnant water in the well and the sand pack with fresh
water representative of the aquifer. Evacuation methods must create
the least possible turbidity in the well and must not lower the water
in the well below the top of the sand pack. Evacuated water must be
properly managed.
b. Surface water sampling -
The Department may require the sampling and analysis of surface water
sampling points in a variety of situations. Surface water sampling
methods must be consistently applied each time a point is sampled and
must comply with the following:
(1) Samples collected from
shallow water should not include bottom sediment. In shallow moving
water, downstream samples must be collected first to avoid disturbing
the bottom sediments.
(2) Each water body over ten
feet deep that is sampled must be checked for stratification, and
each stratum must be checked for contamination using field
parameters. Each stratum showing evidence of contamination must be
separately analyzed. If no stratum shows such evidence, a composite
sample having equal parts of water from each stratum must be
analyzed.
c. Except as otherwise
specified by the Department, all samples must be whole and unfiltered
and must be collected in a manner which produces the least possible
turbidity.
d. Analysis of water quality
data
(1) Field analysis must be
performed after evacuation of the well, either within the borehole
using a probe or immediately after collection. All field test
equipment must be calibrated at the beginning of each sampling day
and checked and recalibrated according to the manufacturer's
specifications. Calibration data must be reported with the analytical
results.
(2) Laboratory analyses must
be performed using analytical methodologies acceptable to the
Department. Where necessary to achieve acceptable minimum detection
levels, the Department may require the use of specific analytical
methods.
(3) All samples must be
collected and stored in the order of the parameter's volatilization
sensitivity using methods, consistently applied, which ensure sample
integrity.
(4) Written reports containing
the laboratory results must be submitted to the Department, and must
include certification by the laboratory as to the accuracy and
analytical methods used.
(5) After volatile organic
samples have been collected, field parameters must be measured from
the next sample collected.
(6) Samples must be properly
preserved and delivered to the laboratory within all appropriate
holding times for the parameters to be analyzed and with proper chain
of custody.
(7) Blanks and replicate
samples must be collected and analyzed in accordance with a method
acceptable to the Department.
C. Site Investigation Report:
The site investigation report must include, at a minimum, a final
version of the site investigation plan, raw field data collected,
analytical calculations, maps, flow nets, cross sections,
interpretations and conclusions. Such report must comprehensively
describe, at a minimum:
1. Regional geology: The
discussion of regional geology must demonstrate how the regional
geology relates to the formation of on-site geologic materials, the
potential for and effects of off-site contaminant migration, and the
location of nearby sensitive environments. This discussion must
include available and appropriate information to describe:
a. Bedrock geology and
structural features (represented on maps and columnar diagrams)
constructed from field exposures and the geologic literature and
describing formation and member names; geologic ages; rock types;
thicknesses; the units' mineralogic and geochemical compositions and
variabilities; rock fabrics; porosities and bulk permeabilities; and
structural geology, including orientation and density or spacing of
folds, faults, joints, and other features;
b. Glacial geology, including
a discussion of the formation, timing, stages, and distribution of
glacial deposits, advances and retreats of ice, and hydrologic
characteristics of the surficial deposits, such as kames, esker,
outwash moraines, etc.;
c. Major topographic features,
their origin and influence upon drainage basin characteristics; and
d. Surface water and
groundwater hydrologic features, including surface drainage patterns,
recharge and discharge areas, wetlands and other sensitive
environments, inferred regional groundwater flow directions,
aquifers, and known primary water supply and principal aquifers,
public water supply wells, and private water supply wells identified
in the water supply well survey; any known peculiarities in surface
water and groundwater geochemistry and any other relevant features.
2. Site specific geology - The
site investigation report must define site hydrogeologic conditions
in three dimensions and their relationship to the proposed landfill.
The report must define site geology, surface water and groundwater
flow, and must relate site-specific conditions to the regional
geology. The report must describe the potential impact the landfill
may have on surface and groundwater resources and other receptors,
including future hydrogeologic conditions which may occur with site
development, and must describe the hydrogeologic conditions in
sufficient detail to construct a comprehensive understanding of
groundwater flow which can be quantified and verified through
hydrologic, geochemical, and geophysical measurements. The report
must provide sufficient data to specify the location and sampling
frequency for environmental monitoring points, form the basis for
contingency plans regarding ground and surface water contamination
and explosive gas migration, and support the engineering design of
the landfill.
3. The site-specific
hydrogeologic evaluation must specifically discuss all consolidated
and unconsolidated geologic units. Such evaluation must include maps,
cross-sections, other graphical representations, and a detailed
written analysis of the following:
a. All hydrogeologic units
such as specific glacial deposits and bedrock types, and how they
relate to surface water and groundwater flow. This must include all
hydrogeologic data collected during the site investigation and
explain and evaluate the hydrologic and engineering properties of the
site and each specific unit; and
b. Local groundwater recharge
and discharge areas, high and low groundwater tables and
potentiometric surfaces for each hydrologic unit, vertical and
horizontal hydraulic gradients, groundwater flow directions and
velocities, groundwater boundary conditions, surface and groundwater
interactions, and an evaluation of existing water quality.
D. Environmental Monitoring
Plan: The environmental monitoring plan must describe all proposed
monitoring, including the location of all monitoring points, sampling
schedule, the method of sample collection and preservation,
procedures for shipment of samples for analysis, chain of custody
documentation, analyses to be performed, quality assurance and
quality control measures, analytical and statistical methods, and
reporting requirements. The plan must also include a schedule for
initiation of the existing water quality and operational water
quality monitoring programs and a contingency water quality
monitoring plan. The owner or operator of a SWLF unit must notify the
Director that the environmental monitoring plan has been placed in
the landfill's operating record. This plan must comply with the
following:
1. Groundwater sampling -
Groundwater monitoring wells must be capable of detecting
landfill-derived groundwater contamination.
a. Horizontal well spacing
(1) Horizontal well spacing
must be based upon site-specific conditions including groundwater
flow rates, estimated longitudinal and transverse dispersivity rates,
proximity to or presence of sensitive environments and groundwater
users, the nature of contaminants disposed of at the site, and the
proposed design and size of the landfill including capability for
liner monitoring through a leak detection system.
(2) At a minimum, well spacing
must provide at least one upgradient and three downgradient
monitoring wells or well clusters for each water-bearing unit of the
aquifer.
(3) Some of the downgradient
monitoring wells must be located as close as practical to the waste
boundary to ensure early detection of any contaminant plume.
(4) For SWLF units, all of the
downgradient wells shall be no more than one-hundred, fifty (150)
meters from the waste management unit boundary and will be located on
land owned by the owner of the SWLF unit. The acceptable distance of
these wells from the waste management unit boundary, i.e. the
relevant point of compliance, shall depend on the results of the
hydrogeological report's site investigation, per § 2.1.8(A) of this
Part. For sites where physical obstacles prohibit installation of
some or all of the downgradient wells at the relevant point of
compliance, than these downgradient monitoring wells shall be
installed at the closest practicable hydraulically downgradient
distance from the relevant point of compliance specified by the
Director and the distance chosen shall be approved by the Director.
b. Well screen placement -
Well screens must be located to readily detect groundwater
contamination.
c. Screen length - Well
screens must not exceed 15 feet in length unless otherwise approved
by the Department. The applicant must provide technical justification
for the actual screen length chosen.
d. Geophysical and geochemical
techniques - Where existing contamination is suspected, the
Department may require the use of geophysical and geochemical
techniques to locate contaminated zones before selecting appropriate
well locations and screen depths for environmental monitoring points.
2. Surface water sampling -
The environmental monitoring plan must designate monitoring points
for use in contingency monitoring of the facility for all surface
water bodies that may be significantly impacted by a contaminant
release from the facility. In bodies of standing water, these points
must be located at the point or points of highest likely impact and
must be included in existing water quality monitoring. In flowing
water bodies these points must include sufficient upgradient and
downgradient locations to allow the facility's impact to be measured.
These points, however, do not require existing water quality
analysis. The detailed sampling and analysis requirements of these
points must be specified in the contingency monitoring plan.
3. Water quality monitoring
program - A water quality monitoring program must be implemented for
all environmental monitoring points specified in the environmental
monitoring plan. This program must be tailored to the site to
establish existing water quality for the site prior to landfilling,
operational water quality during operation of the site and the
post-closure period, and contingency water quality if contamination
is detected at the site. These programs must meet the following
minimum requirements:
E. Existing water quality
1. The applicant must
establish an existing water quality database to characterize the site
geochemistry.
a. The license application
must contain a preliminary evaluation of water quality consisting of
the first round of sampling and analyses for a representative number
of monitoring points. These samples must be analyzed for the
parameters listed in §§ 2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of this Part. The
Department may increase or reduce sampling and analysis of monitoring
points and parameters as necessary to define site hydrogeology and
geochemistry in support of the interpretations and conclusions of the
site investigation report.
b. Before disposition of waste
in the facility, all environmental monitoring points not previously
sampled must be sampled and analyzed for one round of quarterly
sampling. This round must be analyzed for the parameters listed in §§
2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of this Part.
c. If elevated contaminant
levels are detected and additional detailed information is needed to
establish a complete existing water quality database, the Department
may require one or more rounds of sampling and analysis in any
sampling point.
F. Detection monitoring
1. The environmental
monitoring plan must include a plan for detection monitoring to be
conducted during the operation, closure, and post-closure periods of
the facility. The detection monitoring plan must be able to
distinguish landfill-derived contamination from the existing water
quality at the site. The plan also must describe trigger mechanisms
based on a Department approved statistical method for initiating
assessment monitoring. Trigger mechanisms shall consist of
statistically significant increases over background for one or more
of the § 2.3.26 of this Part parameters, at any landfill groundwater
monitoring wells at the waste management unit boundary. The
Department may require modification of this plan as additional
sampling data becomes available throughout the life of the facility.
The minimum requirements for detection monitoring are:
a. Except as provided below in
each calendar year, sampling and analysis must be performed at least
quarterly during the active operating life of the landfill and at
least semi-annually during the closure and post-closure monitoring
periods. For SWLF units, sampling and analysis shall be performed for
each upgradient and downgradient well, during each monitoring event,
with allowed exceptions for wells in vicinities where landfilling has
not commenced, per § 2.1.8(C)(3)(b)((2)) of this Part.
b. The Department may approve
phased sampling, where hydrogeologic conditions warrant, as landfill
cells are constructed or as post-closure monitoring is completed.
With Department approval, sampling of specific environmental
monitoring points which are not potentially impacted by the portions
of the landfill already constructed, may be deferred, provided that
scheduled sampling commences at least one year before landfill
construction in the vicinity. The Department may withdraw this
approval at any time based upon a change in facility design,
operation, or performance.
c. Routine analysis shall be
performed on parameters from § 2.3.26 of this Part. The Department
may modify the list of routine parameters before granting a permit
for the facility, or during the duration of the permit, if leachate
composition so warrants. If subsequent leachate compositions vary, or
if the waste disposed of at the facility changes, the Department may
reinstate analytical requirements. The license application must
include a list of parameters selected from § 2.3.26 of this Part
that will be used for the routine quarterly monitoring.
d. At each upgradient
(background) and downgradient well, there shall be at least four
independent samples, each separately collected and analyzed for
parameters in § 2.3.26 of this Part during the first sampling event
(of the detection monitoring program during or after waste has been
deposited.)
e. The statistical method
chosen for evaluating groundwater monitoring data for each parameter
in § 2.3.26 of this Part shall be one of the allowed optional
methods per 40 C.F.R. §§ 258.53(g) and (h) (2017), incorporated in
§ 1.3(A) of this Subchapter. The owner or operator of a SWLF unit
must specify in the landfill's operating record, the statistical
method to be used.
f. If the owner or operator of
a SWLF unit determines that there is a statistically significant
increase over background for one or more of the parameters in §
2.3.26 of this Part, at any of the landfill's boundary monitoring
wells, than the owner or operator shall, within fourteen (14) days of
this finding, place a notice of these details in the landfill's
operating record and shall notify the Director of this action.
g. If triggering of assessment
monitoring occurs, than the owner or operator of a SWLF unit has the
option to successfully demonstrate, within ninety (90) days, that
this triggering was due to an error in sampling, analysis,
statistical evaluation or natural variation in groundwater quality.
If this successful demonstration occurs, including a report
documenting this demonstration, as certified by a qualified
groundwater scientist or approved by the Director, than the landfill
owner or operator can continue to employ detection monitoring (rather
than assessment monitoring).
G. Assessment Monitoring
1. The environmental
monitoring plan must include a plan for assessment monitoring, as
described in § 2.1.8(D)(3)(c) of this Part, which must be conducted
when contamination is found. The plan also must describe trigger
mechanisms based on a Department approved statistical method for
initiating corrective action. Trigger mechanisms shall consist of
MCLs promulgated under Section 1412 of the Safe Drinking Water Act,
and an appropriate, health-based and/or environmental
protection-based level approved by the Department. All assessment
monitoring plans are subject to Department approval, may be modified
at any time by the Department when necessary to protect public health
and the environment, and must include the following:
a. If contamination as
determined by using the statistical method in evaluating detection
monitoring for one or more routine parameters is found, or if there
is any scientifically valid evidence of off-site contamination, then:
(1) The owner or operator of
the facility must sample and analyze all affected monitoring points
for the parameters in §§ 2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of this Part during the
next quarterly sampling event. This next sampling event must occur
within ninety (90) days of the triggering of assessment monitoring.
If contamination detected poses an immediate threat to public health
or the environment as determined by the Department, additional or
more frequent sampling may be required as part of a corrective action
plan approved by the Department.
(2) Subsequent sampling and
analysis for parameters in §§ 2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of this Part must
be conducted within 90 days and at least quarterly subsequently for
active, operating landfills and at least semi-annually subsequently
for closed landfills (during the closure and post-closure monitoring
periods), until the conditions for curtailing contingency water
quality monitoring specified in § 2.1.8(D)(3)(c)((4)) of this Part
are met.
(3) The Director may specify
an appropriate subset of wells to be sampled and analyzed for
parameters in §§ 2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of this Part during assessment
monitoring. The Director may delete any of the § 2.3.27 of this Part
monitoring parameters, if the owner or operator of a SWLF unit, or
their representative, can show that the removed constituents are not
reasonably expected to be in or derived from the waste contained in
the landfill.
(4) At least one sample must
be collected and analyzed from each well monitored, during each
sampling event. Furthermore for any of the parameters listed in §§
2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of this Part detected in any downgradient well in
these nits, during assessment monitoring, a minimum of four
independent samples must be collected and analyzed from each
background well and from at least each downgradient well having
detected that parameter, to establish a background level for that
parameter and for statistical comparison purposes.
(5) The owner or operator of a
SWLF unit must place in the landfill operating record, within
fourteen (14) days of receipt of analytical results from assessment
monitoring, a notice identifying any of the parameters listed in §§
2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of this Part that have been detected and must
notify the Director that this notice has been placed in this record.
b. If contamination as
determined by using the statistical method in evaluating assessment
monitoring for one or more of the parameters in § 2.3.27 of this
Part is found, or if there is any scientifically valid evidence of
off-site contamination, then:
(1) The owner or operator of
the facility must initiate an assessment of corrective measures,
select a remedy and implement a corrective action program in
accordance with the requirements described in § 2.3.28 of this Part.
c. The Department may require
initiation of specific assessment monitoring based upon landfill
containment failure shown by any means, including, but not limited
to, contamination found in off-site wells beyond the property
boundary.
d. Once initiated, assessment
monitoring must be continued until the elevated parameter is shown
not to be landfill-derived, or that the release by the landfill has
been remediated. Assessment monitoring also may be reduced or
discontinued with the approval of the Department if such monitoring
is no longer needed to protect public health or the environment.
Assessment monitoring for parameters in §§ 2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of
this Part must continue at affected well(s) at least until the
concentration of all parameters in §§ 2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of this
Part are shown to be at or below background values (at the upgradient
well(s)), using one of the accepted statistical procedures in 40
C.F.R. § 258.53(g) (2017), incorporated in § 1.3(A) of this
Subchapter, for two consecutive sampling events. The owner or
operator of the SWLF unit must notify the Director of these
occurrences during the two consecutive sampling events and must, at
minimum, return to detection monitoring at these previously affected
wells. For SWLF units, assessment monitoring at affected wells must
continue, if these wells' analytical results continue to show
concentrations of one or more parameters in §§ 2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of
this Part above background (upgradient) values and all concentrations
are below the groundwater protection standard values established per
§ 2.1.8(C)(3)(c)((7)) of this Part below.
e. Where existing water
quality shows contamination, the applicant must establish an
assessment monitoring plan capable of detecting additional
groundwater contamination from the proposed facility.
f. If one or more of the
parameters in §§ 2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of this Part are detected at
statistically significant levels above the groundwater protection
standard values established per § 2.1.8(C)(3)(c)((7)) of this Part
below, then:
(1) The landfill owner or
operator must place in its operating record, within fourteen (14)
days of receiving analytical results, a notice identifying the
parameters in §§ 2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of this Part that have
statistically exceeded the groundwater protection standard values, in
any sampling event, and must notify the Director and the local
government officials that the notice has been placed in its operating
record.
(2) The landfill owner or
operator must characterize the nature and extent of the release by
installing additional monitoring wells as necessary and, at minimum,
must install at least one monitoring well at the facility boundary in
the direction of contaminant migration and must perform assessment
monitoring at this well.
(3) The landfill owner or
operator must notify all persons who own the land or reside on the
land that directly overlies any part of the plume of contamination,
if contaminants have migrated off-site as indicated by sampling of
wells.
(4) The landfill owner or
operator must initiate an assessment of corrective action within
ninety (90) days (per § 2.3.28 of this Part) or may, at his option,
demonstrate that a source other than his landfill caused the
contamination or demonstrate that the indicated contamination
resulted from error in sampling, analysis, statistical evaluation, or
natural variation in groundwater quality. A report documenting this
demonstration must be certified by a qualified groundwater scientist
or must be approved by the Director and the report shall be placed in
the landfill's operating record. If this successful demonstration is
made, then:
(AA) The landfill owner or
operator does not have to initiate an assessment of corrective
measures, but must continue assessment monitoring, until necessary
conditions for returning to detection monitoring are met, per §
2.1.8(C)(3)(c)((4)) of this Part.
(BB) The landfill owner or
operator does not have to add additional monitoring wells, per §
2.1.8(C)(3)(c)((6)) of this Part, or notify the owner or occupants of
adjacent property of off-site migration of contaminants, per §
2.1.8(C)(3)(c)((6)) of this Part.
g. For all landfill units, the
groundwater protection standard value for each parameter in §§
2.3.26 and 2.3.27 of this Part shall be the following:
(1) For parameters for which a
maximum contaminant level (MCL) has been promulgated under Section
1412 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (codified) under 40 C.F.R. § 141
(2017), incorporated in § 1.3(A) of this Subchapter, the MCL for
that parameter.
(2) For parameters for which
MCL's have not been promulgated, either:
(AA) The background
concentration for the parameter as established from background
(upgradient) well(s) or
(BB) An alternate groundwater
protection standard, established by the Director, based on
appropriate health risks which satisfy the following criteria:
(i) The level is derived in a
manner consistent with Federal guidelines for assessing the health
risks of pollutants (51 FR 33992, 34006, 34014, 34028, Sept. 24,
1986, incorporated in § 1.3(B) of this Subchapter), and
(ii) The level is based on
scientifically valid studies conducted in accordance with the Toxic
Substances Control Act Good Laboratory Practice Standards (40 C.F.R.
§ 792 (2017), incorporated in § 1.3(A) of this Subchapter) or
equivalent; and
(iii) For carcinogens, the
level represents a concentration associated within an excess lifetime
cancer risk level (due to continuous lifetime exposure) within the 1
x 10 -4 to 1 x 10 -6 range; and
(iv) For systemic toxicants
(which include toxic chemicals causing effects other than cancer or
mutation) the level represents a concentration to which the human
population (including sensitive sub-groups) could be exposed to on a
daily basis that is likely to be without appreciable risk of
deleterious effects during a lifetime.
(CC) In establishing alternate
groundwater protection standards, per § 2.1.8(D)(3)(b) of this Part
the Director may consider:
(i) Multiple contaminants in
the groundwater,
(ii) Exposure threats to
sensitive environmental receptors,
(iii) Other site-specific
exposure or potential exposure to ground water.
h. For parameters for which
the background level is higher than the MCL, per §
2.1.8(C)(3)(c)((7)) of this Part, or is higher than health-based
levels per § 2.1.8(C)(3)(c)((7)) of this Part, the background
concentration shall be used.
H. Reporting of data
1. Unless more rapid reporting
is required to address an imminent environmental or public health
concern, the owner or operator of the facility must report all water
quality monitoring results to the Department on a quarterly basis.
The report must include:
a. A table showing the sample
collection date, the analytical results, designation of upgradient
wells and location number for each environmental monitoring point
sampled, applicable water quality standards, trigger values, QA/QC
notations, and method detection limits (MDL).
b. In addition, tables or
graphical representations comparing current water quality and
existing water quality and upgradient water quality must be
presented.
c. A summary of the
contraventions of water quality standards, and discussion of results,
including elevations of parameters above background concentrations
based on statistical analyses; and any proposed modifications to the
sampling and analysis schedule necessary to meet the requirements of
§§ 2.1.8(D)(3)(c)((7))(BB)(i) through (iii) of this Part.
d. Any determination of
contamination detected must be reported to the Department within 48
hours of such determination.
e. All QA/QC documentation
must be made available to the Department upon request.
f. The annual report must
contain a summary of the water quality information presented, with
special note of any changes in water quality which have occurred
throughout the year.
g. Contaminant trigger
mechanisms - In sensitive environments or in areas of existing
contamination, the Department may require the environmental
monitoring plan to specify contaminant levels which, when exceeded,
will signal groundwater contamination and commence assessment
monitoring and possible remedial actions.
2.1.9 Closure and Post -
Closure Plans and Financial Assurance:
A. Pursuant to the
requirements set forth in § 1.5(J) of this Subchapter, the operator
or applicant shall submit a closure plan, including information on
the following:
1. Fences, gates, and all
other security measures to prevent unauthorized access to the site
2. Groundwater and surface
water monitoring devices and stations
3. Final grades
4. Legal boundaries
5. Final cover system,
including a description of the methods and procedures to be used to
install the cover, and meeting the requirements of § 2.2.12 of this
Part:
a. Bedding layer
b. Low permeability barrier
layer
c. Drainage layer
d. Top soil and vegetative
cover
B. Accompanying the plan in §
2.1.9(A) of this Part, the operator or applicant shall also submit
information on the following:
1. Anticipated date of closure
2. Methods of restricting
access and preventing additional waste disposal
3. Methods of protecting
ground and surface water and controlling air emissions
4. Anticipated starting and
completion date of installation of the final cover system, including
a schedule for completing each portion of the cover system.
5. Method of maintaining
drainage control structures to prevent ponding and erosion to the
cover. The surface drainage system must be designed and constructed
to protect the cover from the peak discharge of a 24-hour 100-year
frequency storm.
6. Method of maintaining soil
cover integrity, slopes, cover vegetation and gas venting structures
during the post-closure monitoring and maintenance period.
7. Method of maintaining the
leachate collection and disposal system. Leachate treatment or
disposal must be addressed for a minimum of 30 years or for as long
as leachate is capable of adversely impacting the environment.
8. An estimate of the largest
area of the landfill ever requiring a final cover at any time during
the active life of the landfill.
9. An estimate of the maximum
inventory of wastes ever on site over the active life of the
landfill.
10. Description of the
operation and maintenance of a gas monitoring system, that meets the
requirements of 40 C.F.R. § 258.23 (2017), incorporated in § 1.3(A)
of this Subchapter and § 2.3.8 of this Part.
C. A post-closure monitoring
and maintenance operations manual is required. This must provide
personnel with detailed instructions for assuring efficient
monitoring, leachate management which would include recording of the
total volume of leachate stored and removed from the facility,
sampling and analysis, and proper maintenance of all facility
components to maintain the facility and meet the requirements of this
rule for a minimum period of thirty (30) years after landfill
closure. This manual must be submitted with the closure plan
developed in accordance with this rule. The manual must indicate the
frequency for monitoring and maintenance actions and the name,
address, and telephone number of the facility contact person during
the post-closure period.
D. A financial estimate of the
costs to properly close the facility. With respect to financial
assurance (§ 1.5(J)(b) of this Subchapter), the applicant must post
financial assurance for the full amount of the closure cost estimate
as a pre-condition for the issuance of a solid waste management
facility license.
E. The landfill owner or
operator shall notify the Director when a copy of the closure plan
has been placed in the landfill's operating records and for a new
SWLF unit, this action must occur prior to receiving waste at the
facility.
F. Prior to beginning closure
of each SWLF unit, the landfill owner or operator shall notify the
Director that a notice of intent to close the unit has been placed in
the landfill's operating record.
G. Planned uses (if any) of
the property during the post closure period, subject to requirements
of § 2.3.4(C)(6)(b) of this Part, shall be submitted to the
Director. The owner or operator of an existing SWLF unit shall notify
the Department expediently that a post-closure plan has been placed
in the landfill's operating record. The owner or operator of a new
SWLF unit or of a lateral expansion of a SWLF unit shall notify the
Department that this post-closure plan has been placed in its
operating record, prior to initial receipt of waste in the new or
lateral expansion unit.
H. Financial Assurance for
Closure of a SWLF Unit:
1. The landfill owner or
operator must have a detailed written estimate, in current dollars of
the cost of hiring a third party to close the largest area of the
landfill ever requiring a final cover at any time during the active
life, in accordance with the closure plan. The owner or operator must
notify the Director that the estimate has been placed in the
landfill's operating record.
2. The closure cost estimate
must equal the cost of closing the largest area of the landfill ever
requiring a final cover at any time during its active life when the
extent and manner of its operation would make closure the most
expensive.
3. During the landfill's
active life, the owner or operator must annually adjust the closure
cost estimate for inflation.
4. The owner or operator must
increase the closure cost estimate and the amount of financial
assurance provided, if changes to the closure plan or landfill
conditions increase the maximum cost of closure at any time during
the remaining active life.
5. The owner or operator may
reduce the closure cost estimate and the amount of financial
assurance provided, if the cost estimate exceeds the maximum cost of
closure at any time during the remaining life of the landfill. The
owner or operator must notify the Director that the justification for
the reduction in the closure cost estimate and the amount of
financial assurance has been placed in the landfill's operating
record.
6. The landfill owner or
operator must establish financial assurance for closure of the
landfill, in compliance with § 2.3.29 of this Part. The owner or
operator must provide continuous closure assurance until released
from financial assurance requirements by demonstrating compliance
with §§ 2.3.4(C)(5) and (6) of this Part.
I. Financial Assurance for
Post Closure of a SWLF Unit:
1. The landfill owner or
operator must have a detailed written estimate, in current dollars,
of the cost of hiring a third party to conduct post-closure care of
the landfill in compliance with the post-closure requirements within
§§ 2.1.9(B) and (C) of this Part. The post-closure cost estimate
used to demonstrate financial assurance must account for the total
costs of conducting post-closure care, including annual and periodic
costs incurred over the entire post-closure care period. The owner or
operator must notify the Director that this estimate has been placed
in the landfill's operating record.
2. The cost estimate for
post-closure care must be based on the most expensive costs of
post-closure care during the post-closure care period.
3. During the active life of
the landfill and during the post-closure care period, the owner or
operator must annually adjust the post-closure cost estimate for
inflation.
4. The owner or operator must
increase the post-closure cost estimate and the amount of
post-closure care financial assurance provided, if changes in the
post-closure plan or landfill conditions increase the cost of
post-closure care.
5. The owner or operator may
reduce the post-closure cost estimate and the amount of post-closure
care financial assurance provided, if the cost estimate exceeds the
maximum cost of post-closure care remaining over the post-closure
care period. The owner or operator must notify the Director that the
justification for the reduction of the post-closure cost estimate and
the amount of financial assurance has been placed in the operating
record.
6. The owner or operator must
establish financial assurance for post-closure care, in compliance
with § 2.3.29 of this Part. The owner or operator must provide
continuous post-closure care assurance until released from financial
assurance requirements by demonstrating compliance with post-closure
care requirements, per §§ 2.1.9(B) and (C) of this Part.
2.1.10 Site Engineering
A. The following areas shall
be marked with stakes at the site at the time of the engineering
survey. The stakes must be visible and must be maintained at all
times.
1. Area enclosed by legal
boundaries
2. Areas to be filled as
indicated in operating plan
3. Areas to be used for
leachate treatment, storage or disposal
4. Areas to be used for
storing salvaged materials
5. Areas to be used for
special waste as listed in § 2.3.6(D) of this Part.
2.1.11 Conservation
Easement
As a condition of issuance of
a license for a solid waste management facility, the owner of the
land on which the facility is to be located shall grant to the State
of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations a perpetual conservation
easement. The easement shall be recorded in the land evidence records
of the city (cities) or town (towns) in which the land is located and
shall describe the permitted facility and the activities to be
conducted therein. Under the terms of the easement, the Director or
his duly authorized agents of the State of Rhode Island shall have a
perpetual right to enter upon such land at reasonable times for the
purpose of inspecting the facility, or for the purpose of conducting
tests where the facility is or was located. Such easement shall
include a prohibition on any excavation or other disturbance or
construction of the facility site without prior written approval from
the Director. The conservation easement shall also include the
notation required by § 2.3.15 of this Part.
2.1.12 Landfill Gas
Recovery Facilities
A. § 2.1.12 of this Part
regulates the construction and operation of all landfill gas recovery
facilities that remove landfill gas from landfills subject to
regulation under the provisions of this Rule. Landfill gas recovery
facilities must be constructed and operated in accordance with all
applicable requirements of all federal and state regulations.
B. An application for approval
to construct and operate a landfill gas recovery facility must be
submitted in accordance with the following requirements.
C. Site Plans: Site plans
including all of the information listed below for all areas within
the site shall be submitted. The site plans must be drawn to an
appropriate scale adjusted to fit on a standard size sheet. The
required information includes:
1. Landfill property
boundaries from which the landfill gas is to be removed
2. Location of the landfill
gas recovery facility
3. Off-site and on-site
utilities including sanitary sewer systems
4. Locations of existing and
proposed gas venting structures, wells, piezometers, environmental
and landfill monitoring points
5. On-site buildings
6. Fences and gates
7. Roads and parking areas
8. Existing drainage culverts
and on-site drainage structures
9. Landfill areas from which
landfill gas is to be recovered
10. Site topography with five
foot minimum contour intervals
11. North arrow
12. Location and grades of all
landfill gas collection lines
13. Collection pipe inverts,
clean-outs and valves
14. Extraction well locations
D. Construction and
Engineering Plans: A complete set of construction and engineering
plans and specifications relating to all buildings and equipment of
the facility must be submitted to the Department.
E. Operating Plan: An
operating plan shall be submitted including information on all of the
areas listed below:
1. A description of the
operation of the facility and how the recovered landfill gas will be
used.
2. An estimate of the
quantities of condensate to be generated and a description of how the
condensate will be disposed of
3. Operating hours
4. Personnel and duties
5. Communications equipment
available
6. A description of the
equipment machinery, operational controls, and processes to be used
during normal operation
7. A description of procedures
to be followed during start up and planned and unplanned shutdown of
operations
8. A description of the safety
features of the equipment, controls, and machinery
9. Site security methods
F. Contingency Plan: The
contingency plan must discuss an organized and planned method of
responding to unexpected events during the construction and operation
of the landfill gas facility. The plan must address, at a minimum,
actions to be taken with respect to:
1. Noise
2. Personal injury
3. Explosions
4. Fires
5. Detection of explosive
landfill gases both on-site and off-site
6. Equipment to be used to
maintain proper landfill gas venting and control when normal
operations cease
G. Closure Plan: Pursuant to
the requirements set forth in § 1.5(J) of this Subchapter, the
operator or applicant shall submit a closure plan including
information on the following:
1. Date of proposed closure
2. Methods of restricting
access
3. Methods of protecting
ground and surface water and controlling air emissions in the
vicinity of the facility
4. Methods to vent and control
landfill gases after operation of the facility ceases
5. An estimate of the costs to
properly close the facility
6. Intended future use of the
facility, following closure (immediate and long term use)
2.2 Solid Waste Landfill
Construction Standards
2.2.1 General
Construction of sanitary
landfill facilities shall meet all regulations set forth in this rule
and shall also comply with all applicable federal rules, laws,
regulations or other federal requirements.
2.2.2 Horizontal and
Vertical Control
A. One permanent survey
benchmark of known elevation measured from the National Geodetic
Vertical Datum of 1929 must be established and maintained for each 25
acres of developed landfill, or part thereof, at the site. This
benchmark must be the reference point for establishing vertical
elevation control.
B. North American Datum of
1983 Coordinates must be established. Horizontal control must be
established and one of its points must be the benchmark of known NAD
1983 Coordinates.
2.2.3 Liner System
A. The minimum liner
requirements for all landfills accepting solid waste must consist of
the following:
1. On all bottom areas where
the landfill slope is less than or equal to 25 percent, the liner
system must consist of a double composite liner separated by a
secondary leachate collection and removal system.
2. On all side slope areas
where the landfill slope is greater than 25 percent, the liner system
need only consist of an upper geomembrane liner and a secondary
(lower) composite liner separated by a secondary leachate collection
and removal system.
3. A composite liner must
consist of two components; an upper geomembrane liner placed directly
above a low permeability soil layer meeting the requirements
specified in §§ 2.2.7 and 2.2.6 of this Part respectively. Each
composite liner is considered a single liner.
4. The double composite liner
system must include a primary leachate collection and removal system
consisting of a 24-inch granular soil layer with a leachate
collection pipe network. The primary leachate collection and removal
system lies above the primary (upper) composite liner. The primary
composite liner consists of a geomembrane that directly overlays an
18 inch low permeability soil layer. The primary composite liner lies
above the secondary leachate collection and removal system. The
secondary leachate collection and removal system consists of either a
leachate collection pipe network with a 12 inch granular soil layer,
or an effective layer of geosynthetic material. The secondary
leachate collection and removal system lies above the secondary
(lower) composite liner, which consists of a geomembrane that
directly overlays a 24 inch low permeability soil layer.
5. The Department shall not
allow any variance from the requirement to include a secondary
(lower) composite liner, as part of the liner system.
2.2.4 Leachate Collection
and Removal System
A. The leachate collection and
removal system must be designed to effectively remove leachate from
the landfill. A means of assessing leachate flows in both the primary
and secondary leachate collection and removal system must be detailed
on plans and discussed in the engineering report.
B. The primary and secondary
leachate collection and removal systems must conform to the following
requirements:
1. A primary leachate
collection and removal system, located over the upper composite
liner, must be hydraulically designed to remove leachate from the
landfill and ensure that the leachate head over the primary composite
liner does not exceed one foot at expected flow capacity, except
during storm events. This collection and removal system must be
designed and constructed, at a minimum, in accordance with the
requirements of §§ 2.2.8 and 2.2.9 of this Part.
2. A secondary leachate
collection and removal system must be located between the upper and
lower liner systems to effectively collect and rapidly remove
leachate from the lower liner system. This collection system must be
designed and constructed, at a minimum, in accordance with the
requirements of §§ 2.2.8, 2.2.9 and 2.2.10 of this Part.
3. The primary and secondary
leachate collection and removal systems must be designed and built to
allow for representative sampling of leachate, and to operate without
clogging during the effective site life and post-closure maintenance
period. All pipes located in the primary leachate collection and
removal system must be designed to allow for accessibility of
equipment for routine cleaning and maintenance. All leachate
conveyance lines outside the double composite liner system of the
landfill must be designed to have double containment, and must be
constructed to provide for leak detection and collection. Double
containment and leak detection provisions shall be maintained along
the entire length of conveyance line(s) handling only leachate or
other liquid wastes associated with the design of the landfill.
2.2.5 Landfill Subgrade
A. The landfill subgrade is
the uppermost in-situ soil layer or select fill that must be graded
and prepared for landfill construction. A foundation analysis must be
performed to determine the structural integrity of the subgrade to
support the loads and stresses imposed by the weight of the landfill
and to support overlying facility components. For lateral expansions
adjacent to existing landfills, the Department may approve
encroachment upon the existing landfill's side slope if a leachate
barrier system is designed and constructed to minimize leachate
migration into the existing landfill.
1. Materials Required: The
landfill subgrade must be free of organic material and consist of
on-site soils, or any select fill if approved by the Department.
2. Construction Requirements:
The landfill subgrade must be graded in accordance with the
requirements of the approved engineering plans, report, and
specifications. The material must be sufficiently dry and
structurally sound to ensure that the first lift and all succeeding
lifts of soil placed over the landfill subgrade can be adequately
compacted to the design requirements.
3. Certification Requirements:
At a minimum, the subgrade surface must be inspected in accordance
with the following requirements:
a. Before placing any material
over the subgrade, the project engineer must visually inspect the
exposed surface to evaluate the suitability of the subgrade and
ensure that the surface is properly compacted, smooth, and uniform,
and that elevations are consistent with the Department approved
plans.
b. The subgrade must be
proof-rolled using procedures and equipment acceptable to the
Department.
c. The subgrade must be tested
for density and moisture content at a minimum frequency of five tests
per acre.
2.2.6 Soil Component of the
Liner System
A. The soil component of the
liner system must be a continuous layer of low permeability soil
constructed to control fluid migration.
1. Materials Required
a. Primary composite liner:
The soil component of the primary composite liner must be a minimum
compacted thickness of 18 inches. The top six inches directly below
and in contact with the upper geomembrane liner must have a maximum
remolded coefficient of permeability of 1 x 10 -7
centimeters per second. The lower 12 inches of soil must be compacted
to achieve a maximum remolded coefficient of permeability of 1 x 10 -5
centimeters per second and be placed without damaging any
geosynthetic or secondary leachate collection and removal system
components below the primary composite liner. The soil material must
be free of particles greater than three inches in any dimension.
b. Secondary composite liner:
The soil component of the secondary composite liner must be at least
24 inches in compacted thickness, and must have a maximum remolded
coefficient of permeability of 1 x 10 -7 centimeters per
second throughout its thickness. The soil material must be free of
particles greater than three inches in any dimension.
2. Construction Requirements:
The project engineer must ensure that the soil component of the liner
system installation conforms with the following minimum requirements:
a. The soil component of the
liner system must be placed on a slope of no less than two percent to
promote positive drainage across the liner surface and at a maximum
slope not greater than 33 percent to minimize erosion and facilitate
construction.
b. Compaction must be
performed by properly controlling the moisture content, lift
thickness, and other necessary details to obtain satisfactory
results. The maximum final compacted thickness of each lift of soil
material must be six inches. When placing the first lift of the soil
component of the liner system, the thickness may be increased to
ensure adequate compaction and attain the desired permeability
depending upon the type and size of compaction equipment used and
whether or not the liner and subgrade are of dissimilar materials.
Any succeeding lifts of the soil component of the lining system may
be reduced in thickness, depending upon the compaction equipment
used.
c. The moisture content of the
soil component of the liner system must be maintained within the
range identified in accordance with § 2.2.6(C) of this Part before
and during compaction of the soil lift to ensure that the remolded
lift attains a maximum in-situ permeability as required. The density
after compaction must be within the range identified in accordance
with § 2.2.6(C) of this Part to ensure that the remolded lift
attains a maximum in-situ permeability, as required.
3. Certification Requirements:
The project engineer must include in the construction certification
report a discussion of all quality assurance and quality control
testing required in § 2.2.6(A)(3) of this Part. The testing
procedures and protocols must be submitted in accordance with §
2.1.6 of this Part and approved by the Department. The results of all
testing must be included in the construction certification report
including documentation of any failed test results, descriptions of
the procedures used to correct the improperly installed material, and
statements of all retesting performed in accordance with the
following requirements:
a. The project engineer must
certify the quality control testing of any soil liner materials to
ensure that the specified material meets the permeability
requirements of § 2.2.6(A) of this Part and the approved engineering
plans, reports, and specifications. Before and during construction of
the soil component of the liner system, the following information
must be approved by the project engineer: one analysis of soil
particle size for every 2,500 cubic yards of soil liner materials
placed; one Atterberg limits analysis of plastic and liquid limit and
plasticity index for every 1,500 cubic yards of soil liner material
placed; one laboratory permeability test using a triaxial cell with
back pressure for every 5,000 cubic yards of material placed; one
moisture content test for every 1,000 cubic yards of material placed;
and a minimum of one comparison of the moisture-density-permeability
relation for every 5,000 cubic yards of material placed, and one
comparison each time soil material changes are noted.
b. Quality assurance testing
included in this Rule must be compared to and evaluated against the
quality control testing of § 2.2.6(C)(1) of this Part, where
applicable. Quality assurance testing must include: at least five
density tests must be performed per acre per lift of soil material
placed; a minimum of five moisture content tests per acre per lift of
soil material placed; and one shelby tube sample for laboratory
permeability testing must be taken per acre per lift. Any tests
resulting in penetration of the soil liner must be repaired using
bentonite or other means acceptable to the Department.
2.2.7 Geomembrane Liners
A. Geomembrane liners are low
permeability geosynthetics having a maximum coefficient of
permeability of 1 x 10 -12 centimeters per second, and are
used to control fluid migration from landfills.
1. Materials Required: The
geomembrane liner material must have a demonstrated hydraulic
conductivity less than 1 x 10 -12 centimeters per second,
and chemical and physical resistance not adversely affected by waste
placement or generated leachate. Documentation must be submitted to
ensure chemical compatibility of the geomembrane liner material
chosen or, in absence of the appropriate documentation, chemical
compatibility testing must be performed using a test method
acceptable to the Department.
2. Construction Requirements:
Geomembranes must be installed in accordance with the requirements of
the approved engineering plans, reports and specifications, and
manufacturer's recommendations. The project engineer must ensure that
the geomembrane installation, at a minimum, must conform with the
following:
a. The geomembrane must have a
minimum thickness of 45 mils in the primary composite liner and 36
mils in the secondary composite liner. Geomembranes consisting of
high density polyethylene (HDPE) shall be at least 80 mils thick in
the primary composite liner and 60 mils thick in the secondary
composite liner.
b. All geosynthetic materials
must be installed on a subgrade that has a minimum two percent slope
to promote positive drainage.
c. Any geosynthetic materials
installed on slopes greater than 25 percent must be designed to
withstand the calculated tensile forces acting upon the geosynthetic
materials. The design must consider the maximum friction angle of the
geosynthetic with regard to any soil-geosynthetic or
geosynthetic-geosynthetic interface, and must ensure that overall
slope stability is maintained.
d. The surface of the
supporting soil below which the geosynthetic material will be
installed must be reasonably free of stones, organic matter,
irregularities, protrusions, loose soil, and any abrupt changes in
grade that could damage the geosynthetic. The supporting soil must
conform to the requirements of § 2.2.5 of this Part.
e. The anchor trench must be
excavated to the length and width prescribed on the approved design
drawings.
f. Field seams should be
oriented parallel to the line of maximum slope, i.e., oriented along,
not across the slope. In corners and irregularly-shaped locations,
the number of field seams should be minimized. No horizontal seam
should be less than five feet from the toe of slope toward the
upslope direction of the landfill.
g. The materials must be
seamed using an appropriate method acceptable to the Department. Seam
testing must be in accordance with the requirements of § 2.2.7(C) of
this Part.
h. The seam area must be free
of moisture, dust, dirt, debris, and foreign material of any kind
before seaming.
i. Field seaming is prohibited
when ambient air temperatures, precipitation and wind conditions
prevent construction of the liner seams in accordance with all
quality assurance and quality control requirements.
j. The field crew foreman of
the liner installer must have a documented minimum qualification of
successful installation experience of at least fifty (50) acres of
previous landfill or comparable geosynthetic systems on a minimum of
five (5) different projects.
3. Certification Requirements:
The project engineer must include in the construction certification
report a discussion of the approved data resulting from the quality
assurance and quality control testing required in § 2.2.7(A)(3) of
this Part. The results of all testing must be included in the
construction certification report including documentation of any
failed test results, descriptions of the procedures used to correct
the failed material, and statements of all retesting performed.
a. The project engineer must
certify the quality control testing of any geosynthetic materials
ensuring that the material and workmanship meet the requirements of
the approved engineering plans, reports, and specifications. Before
installing any geosynthetic material, the following information must
be available to the project engineer for approval:
(1) Origin and identification
of the raw materials used to manufacture the geosynthetic material;
(2) Copies of quality control
certificates issued by the producer of the raw materials used to
manufacture the geosynthetic material; and
(3) Reports of tests conducted
to verify the quality of raw materials used to manufacture the
geosynthetics. Tests for specific gravity, melt flow index, and
percent carbon black must be performed using a method acceptable to
the Department.
b. The project engineer must
verify through appropriate documentation that the quality control
testing of any geosynthetic rolls fabricated into blankets at the
factory took place in accordance with the following requirements:
(1) The geomembrane was
continuously inspected for uniformity, damage, imperfections, holes,
cracks, thin spots, and foreign materials. Additionally, the
geomembrane liner must be inspected for tears, punctures, and
blisters. Any imperfections must be immediately repaired and
reinspected.
(2) Non-destructive seam
testing was performed on all fabricated seams over their full length
using a test method acceptable to the Department.
(3) Destructive seam testing
was performed on a minimum of two samples per blanket. The samples
must be taken from extra material at the beginning or end of blanket
seams such that the blanket is not damaged and the blanket geometry
is not altered. The size of the sample taken must be large enough to
perform the required testing. An independent laboratory acceptable to
the Department must have performed the required testing on the
samples taken. If a sample fails a destructive test, the entire seam
length must be reconstructed or repaired using a method acceptable to
the Department and retested using non-destructive seam testing over
their full length using a method acceptable to the Department.
c. Quality assurance testing
performed in the field under the supervision of the project engineer
must assure conformity of the geosynthetic installation with the
engineering plans, reports, and specifications submitted in
accordance with the following requirements:
(1) During the construction
phase, the geosynthetic must be inspected for uniformity, damage, and
imperfections. The liner must be inspected for tears, punctures, or
blisters. Any imperfections must be immediately repaired and
reinspected.
(2) All field seams must be
non-destructively tested in accordance with the procedures listed in
this clause using a test method acceptable to the Department. The
project engineer must: Supervise all non-destructive testing; Record
the location, date, test unit number, name of tester, and results of
all testing; Inform the installer of any required repairs; and
Overlay all seams which cannot be non-destructively tested with the
same geomembrane. The seaming and patching operation must be
inspected by the project engineer for uniformity and completeness.
(3) Destructive testing must
be performed on the geomembrane liner seam sections in accordance
with the requirements listed in this rule and using test methods
acceptable to the Department.
(4) Seam samples for testing
must be taken as follows: a minimum of one test per every 500 feet of
seam length unless a more frequent testing protocol is agreed upon by
the installer and project engineer; additional test locations may be
determined during seaming at the project engineer's discretion; all
test locations must be appropriately documented.
(5) The project engineer must
approve the sample size to be taken. The sample size must be
predetermined as being large enough to perform the required testing.
(6) An independent laboratory
acceptable to the Department must perform the required testing, which
must include, at a minimum, testing for seam strength and peel
adhesion using testing procedures acceptable to the Department.
(7) If a sample fails
destructive testing the project engineer must ensure that: the seam
is reconstructed between the location of the sample which failed and
the location of the next acceptable sample; or the welding path is
retraced to an intermediate location at least ten feet from the
location of the sample which failed the test, and a second sample is
taken for an additional field test. If this second test sample
passes, the seam must be then reconstructed between the location of
the second test and the original sampled location. If the second
sample fails, this process must be repeated.
(8) All acceptable seams must
lie between two (2) locations where samples passed the test
procedures found in § 2.2.7(C)(3)(c)((4)) of this Part, and include
one (1) test location along the reconstructed seam.
(9) Non-destructive testing of
the geomembrane liner must be performed in accordance with §
2.2.7(C)(3)(b) of this Part.
2.2.8 Soil Drainage Layers
A. All soil material used in
the primary and secondary leachate collection and removal systems of
the landfill must conform to the following requirements:
1. Materials Required: Soil
materials used to construct a drainage layer must be designed to
ensure that the hydraulic leachate head on the primary liner system
does not exceed one foot at the expected flow capacity from the
drainage area, except during storm events. The soil drainage layer
must be free of any organic material and have less than five (5)
percent of the material by weight pass the No. 200 sieve. Soil
material testing must be performed in accordance with § 2.2.8(C) of
this Part.
2. Construction Requirements:
The soil drainage layer must be constructed and graded in accordance
with the requirements of the approved engineering plans, reports, and
specifications along with the following requirements:
a. The minimum thickness of
the soil drainage layer in the primary leachate collection and
removal system must be 24 inches and provide adequate protection to
all liner materials and piping placed within the primary leachate
collection system, and have a minimum coefficient of permeability of
1 x 10 -2 centimeters per second.
b. The minimum thickness of
the secondary leachate collection and removal system layer must be
twelve (12) inches and have a minimum coefficient of permeability of
1 x 10 -1 centimeters per second.
c. The soil drainage layer
must be designed and placed on a minimum slope of two percent to
promote efficient positive drainage to the nearest leachate
collection pipe and prevent ponding above the liner.
3. Certification Requirements:
The project engineer must include in the construction certification
report the results of an analysis of the approved data resulting from
quality assurance and quality control testing required in §
2.2.8(A)(3) of this Part. The results of all testing must be included
in the construction certification report including any failed test
results, descriptions of the procedures used to correct the failed
material, and any retesting performed.
a. The project engineer must
certify the quality control testing of any soil drainage materials,
and ensure that the material meets the requirements of § 2.2.8(A)(1)
of this Part and the approved engineering plans, reports, and
specifications. A particle size analysis of the soil drainage layer
material must be submitted to the project engineer for approval
before installation of the soil drainage layer and during
installation at a frequency of at least one (1) test for every 1,500
cubic yards of material placed.
b. Quality assurance testing
performed by the project engineer must ensure that the material is
placed in accordance with the requirements of the engineering plans,
reports, and specifications.
2.2.9 Leachate Collection
Pipes
A. Leachate collection pipes
that are located in any soil or geosynthetic drainage layer must be
hydraulically designed to remove leachate from the landfill, provide
conveyance to an appropriately designed and sized storage or
treatment facility, and must comply with the following:
B. Materials Required: The
leachate collection pipe must have a minimum diameter of four inches
and meet the following:
1. The physical and chemical
properties must not be adversely affected by waste placement or
leachate generated by the landfill. Documentation must be submitted
which demonstrates the chemical compatibility of the leachate
collection pipe material or, in absence of the appropriate
documentation, chemical compatibility testing must be performed using
a method acceptable to the Department.
2. Piping must have adequate
structural strength to support the maximum static and dynamic loads
and stresses that will be imposed by the overlying material,
including the drainage layer, liners, waste material, and any
equipment used in constructing and operation of the landfill.
Specifications for the proposed leachate collection pipe network must
be submitted in the engineering report.
C. Construction Requirement:
Leachate collection pipes must be installed in accordance with the
requirements of the approved engineering plans, reports, and
specifications. The leachate collection pipe size, spacing and slope
of at least one (1) percent must be designed to ensure that the
leachate head on the primary liner does not exceed one (1) foot at
the expected flows from the drainage area, except during storm
events.
D. Certification Requirements:
The project engineer must include in the construction certification
report a discussion of all quality assurance and quality control
testing to ensure that the material is placed in accordance with
requirements of the approved engineering plans, reports, and
specifications. The testing procedures and protocols must be
acceptable to the Department and submitted in accordance with §
2.1.6 of this Part. The results of all testing must be included in
the construction certification report, including documentation of any
failed test results, a description of the procedures used to correct
the failed material, and any retesting performed.
2.2.10 Geosynthetic
Drainage Layers
A. Any geosynthetic drainage
layers used in the secondary leachate collection and removal system
of a landfill must be designed and constructed to have an equivalent
hydraulic transmissivity to that of a one (1) foot sand layer with a
minimum coefficient of permeability of 1 x 10 -1
centimeters per second, and must comply with the following:
1. Materials Required: The
hydraulic conductivity, transmissivity, and chemical and physical
resistance of the geosynthetic material must not be adversely
affected by waste placement or leachate generated by the landfill.
Documentation must be submitted which demonstrates the chemical
compatibility of the geosynthetic drainage layer material and the
waste to be deposited, or chemical compatibility testing must be
performed using a method acceptable to the Department. Documentation
must also be submitted to ensure effective liquid removal throughout
the active life of the facility, and that the maximum compressive
load of the materials to be placed above the geosynthetic drainage
layer does not impede transmissivity during the post-closure period.
2. Construction Requirements:
The project engineer must ensure that the geosynthetic drainage
layers are installed in accordance with the requirements of the
approved engineering plans, reports, and specifications, and conform
with the following requirements:
a. The geosynthetic drainage
layer must be designed and constructed to effectively remove leachate
from the landfill's secondary leachate collection and removal system.
b. The geosynthetic drainage
layer must be installed in accordance with the procedure set forth in
§§ 2.2.7(B)(2) through (6) and 2.2.7(B)(10) of this Part.
3. Certification Requirements:
The project engineer must include in the construction certification
report a summary of all quality assurance and quality control testing
required in § 2.2.10(A)(3) of this Part. The testing procedures and
protocols must be acceptable to the Department and submitted in
accordance with § 2.1.6 of this Part. The results of all testing
must be included in the construction certification report, including
documentation of any failed test results, a description of the
procedures used to correct the failed material, and any testing
performed.
a. The project engineer must
certify the quality control testing according to the requirements of
§ 2.2.7(C)(1) of this Part for any geosynthetic drainage materials.
The project engineer must also certify that a hydraulic
transmissivity test was performed on the geosynthetic drainage
material at the maximum design compressive load on the materials to
be used in the geosynthetic drainage layers. The test method must
consider the physical properties of all the materials above and below
the geosynthetic drainage material being tested.
b. Quality assurance testing
as performed by the project engineer must adequately demonstrate that
the material is placed in accordance with the requirements of the
engineering plans, reports, and specifications.
2.2.11 Filter Layer
Criteria
A. The filter layer must be
designed to prevent the migration of the fine soil particles into a
coarser grained material, and allow water or gases to freely enter a
drainage medium (pipe or drainage blanket) without clogging.
1. For graded cohesionless
soil filters - The granular soil material used as a filter must have
not more than five percent by weight passing the No. 200 sieve and no
soil particles larger than three (3) inches in any dimension.
2. Geosynthetic Filters:
Geotextiles filter material must demonstrate that the hydraulic
conductivity, and chemical and physical resistance, is not adversely
affected by waste placement, any overlying material or leachate
generated at the landfill. Geotextile filter openings must be sized
in accordance with the following criteria which takes into
consideration the soil found in layers located adjacent to the
geotextile filter:
a. The d85 is the soil
particle size at which 85 percent of the particles are finer, and the
d15 is the soil particle size at which 15 percent of the particles
are finer. The O95 is the apparent opening size of the geotextile at
which 95 percent of the soil particles will pass. An apparent opening
size test acceptable to the Department must be performed to
demonstrate compliance with this criteria.
3. Construction Requirements:
Both the soil filters and geotextiles filters must be installed in
accordance with the approved engineering plans, reports, and
specifications.
4. Certification Requirements:
The project engineer must include in the construction certification
report the results of all the required quality assurance and quality
control testing performed. The testing procedures and protocols must
be acceptable to the Department and submitted in accordance with §
2.1.6 of this Part.
2.2.12 Final Cover System
A. The final cover must be
designed to minimize infiltration of precipitation into the landfill
after closure. It must operate with minimum maintenance and promote
drainage from its surface while minimizing erosion. It must also be
designed so that settling and subsidence are accommodated to minimize
the potential for disruption of continuity and function of the final
cover.
1. Bedding Layer Criteria: A
bedding layer must be located directly below the barrier layer of the
final cover system and above the compacted waste layer.
a. Materials required: The
bedding layer for the final cover system must be free of organic
material and consist of on-site soils or any select fill if approved
by the Department. The bedding material must be free of particles
greater than three (3) inches in any dimension.
b. Construction requirements:
The bedding layer must be constructed and graded in accordance with
the requirements of the approved engineering plans, reports, and
specifications. The minimum thickness of the bedding layer must be
six inches.
c. Certification requirements:
The project engineer must include in the construction certification
report the results of all the required quality assurance and quality
control testing performed. The testing procedures and protocols must
be acceptable to the Department, and submitted in accordance with §
2.1.6 of this Part.
2. Low Permeability Covers:
a. Low permeability barrier
soil covers: A low permeability barrier soil cover is a layer of low
permeability soil constructed to minimize precipitation migration
into the landfill.
(1) Materials required: A low
permeability barrier soil cover must consist of materials having the
same characteristics as those found in § 2.2.6(A)(2) of this Part.
(2) Construction requirements:
Low permeability barrier soil covers must be constructed in
accordance with the requirements of § 2.2.6(B) of this Part. The low
permeability barrier soil cover must be placed on a slope of no less
than five percent to promote positive drainage and at a maximum slope
of 33 percent to minimize erosion.
(3) Certification
requirements: Certification for the installation of barrier soil
covers must be conducted in accordance with the requirements in §
2.1.6 of this Part.
b. Geomembrane covers: A
geomembrane may be used as an alternative to the low permeability
barrier soil cover as a final cover and must be constructed to
preclude precipitation migration into the landfill.
(1) Materials required: The
geomembrane material used in a final cover system must have a maximum
coefficient of permeability of 1 x 10 -12 centimeters per
second, chemical, and physical resistance to materials it may come in
contact with, and accommodate the expected forces and stresses caused
by settlement of waste.
(2) Construction requirements:
Geomembrane covers must be constructed in accordance with the same
requirements as those found in § 2.2.7 of this Part with the
following exceptions: The geomembrane must have a minimum thickness
of 36 mils. Geomembrane consisting of high density polyethylene
(HDPE) shall be at least 60 mils thick. The geomembrane must be
placed on a five percent minimum slope to promote gravity drainage
and a 33 percent maximum slope to ensure stability of the capping
system.
c. Certification requirements:
Certification for the installation of a geomembrane cover must be
conducted in accordance with the same conditions found in § 2.2.7(C)
of this Part.
3. Drainage Layer Criteria:
All soil material used in the drainage layer of the final cover
system must conform to the following requirements.
a. Materials required: Soil
materials used to construct the drainage layer must be free of any
organic material and have less than five percent of the material by
weight pass the No. 200 sieve. Soil material testing must be
performed in accordance with § 2.2.8(C) of this Part.
b. Construction requirements:
The soil drainage layer must be constructed and graded in accordance
with the requirements of the approved engineering plans, report and
specifications, along with the following requirements:
(1) The minimum thickness must
be 12 inches and have a minimum coefficient of permeability of 1 x
10 -3 centimeters per second.
(2) The soil drainage layer
must have a final bottom slope of at least five percent to allow for
settling and subsidence.
(3) To prevent clogging, the
soil drainage layer must be overlain by a graded granular or
synthetic fabric filter that meets the specifications of §§
2.2.11(A) through (D) of this Part.
(4) The soil drainage layer
must be designed so that discharge flows freely in the lateral
direction to minimize head on and flow through the low permeability
layer.
c. Certification requirements:
The drainage soil layer must be certified in accordance with the same
conditions found in §§ 2.2.8(C)(1) and (2) of this Part.
4. Vegetated Top Cover: A
vegetated top cover must be designed and constructed to maintain
vegetative growth over the landfill.
a. Materials required: The
vegetated layer must be suitable to maintain vegetative growth.
b. Construction requirements:
The vegetated top cover must be constructed and graded in accordance
with the following requirements:
(1) The vegetated top cover
must be at least 12 inches thick.
(2) It must support vegetation
that will effectively minimize erosion without need for contingency
application of fertilizers, irrigation, or other non-applied
materials to ensure viability and persistence. (Fertilizers, water
and other materials may be applied during the closure or post-closure
period, if necessary, to establish vegetation or to repair damage).
(3) The vegetated top cover
must be planted with persistent species that will effectively
minimize erosion, and that do not have a root system that will
penetrate beyond the vegetative and drainage layer.
(4) The final top slope must
be, at a minimum, between three (3) and five (5) percent after
allowing for settling and subsidence, and at a maximum slope of 33
percent. For slopes exceeding five (5) percent, the maximum erosion
rate should not exceed 2.0 tons/acre per year using the USDA
Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE).
(5) The vegetated top cover
must have a surface drainage system capable of conducting run-off
across the cap without forming erosion rifts and gullies.
2.2.13 Construction
Certification Report
A construction certification
report must be submitted to the Department within 45 days after the
completion of landfill construction. This report must include, at a
minimum, the information prepared in accordance with the application
requirements of § 2.1.6 of this Part containing results of all
quality assurance and quality control testing required in this
section, including documentation of any failed test results,
descriptions of procedures used to correct the improperly installed
material, and statements of all retesting performed. In addition, the
construction certification report must contain as-built drawings
noting any deviation from the approved engineering plans and must
also contain a comprehensive analysis including, but not limited to,
daily reports from the project engineer and a series of color
photographs of major project features. The Department will review the
submitted material for approval within 30 days after receipt.
2.2.14 Equivalent Design
The applicant may propose an
equivalent design to the individual components of the primary
composite liner required in § 2.2.3(D) of this Part by the
submission in the application of documentation substantiating the
alternative component's ability to perform in the same manner as the
component specified in this section.
2.3 Solid Waste Landfill Operating
Standards
2.3.1 General
Sanitary landfill facilities
shall meet all regulations set forth in this rule in addition to the
General Operating Standards in § 1.7 of this Subchapter and shall
also comply with all applicable federal rules, laws, regulations or
other Federal requirements.
2.3.2 Working Face
The width of the working face
shall be kept as narrow as is consistent with the proper operation of
trucks and equipment in order that the area of waste material exposed
during the operating day is minimal. No working face shall exceed one
hundred fifty (150) feet in width when measured across the operating
surface of the fill. Except where separate areas are designated on
the engineering design for specific wastes, no more than one working
face shall be in use at any one time.
2.3.3 Lift Height
No lift shall exceed twelve
(12) feet in height unless otherwise specified on the approved
engineering design for the site.
2.3.4 Cover Material
A. Initial Cover: All top
surfaces and faces of the working lift shall be covered with six (6)
inches of cover material at least at the end of each working day, or
at more frequent intervals if necessary, to control disease vectors,
fires, odors, blowing litter and scavenging. The cover material shall
be earthen material, except that alternate materials of a thickness
other than six (6) inches, may be approved by the Director, if the
SWLF owner or operator demonstrates that the alternate material and
thickness control disease vectors, fires, odors, blowing litter, and
scavenging without presenting a threat to human health and the
environment.
B. Intermediate Cover: When an
additional lift is not to commence within six (6) months, an
additional six inch layer of cover material shall be applied over the
six (6) inch initial cover layer within one week after the disposal
of refuse to all top surfaces and faces.
C. Final Cover:
1. When no additional lift is
to be added for one year, a total thickness of twenty-four (24)
inches of cover material shall be maintained on all surfaces and
faces.
2. When the landfill operation
is terminated in an area, the area must be closed in accordance with
the approved closure plans and must meet the requirements of §
2.2.12 of this Part.
3. The landfill owner or
operator must begin closure within thirty (30) days of the final
receipt of waste or within one year of the most recent receipt of
waste, if there is remaining landfill capacity and there is
reasonable likelihood that the landfill will receive additional
waste. A request by the landfill owner or operator for extension
beyond the one year deadline for beginning closure may be approved by
the Director, if the owner or operator demonstrates that the landfill
has capacity to receive additional waste and the owner or operator
has taken and will continue to take all steps necessary to prevent
threats to human health and the environment from the unclosed
landfill.
4. The landfill owners or
operators must complete closure activities of each SWLF unit, in
accordance with the closure plan, within one-hundred, eighty (180)
days of the beginning of closure of the unit. A request by the
landfill owner or operator for an extension beyond the 180 day
deadline may be approved by the Director, if the owner or operator
demonstrates that closure will, of necessity, take longer than 180
days and the owner or operator has taken and will continue to take
all steps to prevent threats to human health and the environment from
the unclosed SWLF unit.
5. Following closure of a SWLF
unit, the owner or operator shall notify the Director that closure
has been completed in accordance with the operating plan and that the
notice of this closure has been placed in the landfill's operating
record. This notice shall include a certification, signed by an
independent registered professional engineer or approved by the
Director, verifying that closure has been completed in accordance
with the closure plan.
6. Following closure of a SWLF
unit, the owner or operator shall record a notation on the deed to
the landfill facility property, (or on some other instrument that is
normally examined during title search) and notify the Director of
this notation action, and that a copy of this notated document has
been placed in the landfill's operating record. The notation on the
instrument must in perpetuity notify any potential purchaser of the
property that:
a. The land has been used as a
landfill facility.
b. The land's future use is
restricted; any future use shall not disturb the integrity of the
final cover, liner(s) or any other components of the containment
system or the functioning of the monitoring systems, except if the
proposed disturbance is approved by the Director and if the owner or
operator demonstrates that such disturbance will not increase the
potential threat to human health or the environment.
D. Cover Material Supply: A
four (4) day supply of cover material shall be stored upon the
landfill property at all times. This supply should be calculated on
the basis of one (1) part cover material to four (4) parts of
compacted waste (1,000 lbs/yd 3 ).
E. Maintenance of Cover
Material: All applications of cover material shall be maintained by
the operator in conformance with the requirements of this section.
F. Permeability of Cover
Material: The Director may specify the permeability of cover material
used on a site specific basis. The Director may also require the use
of an impermeable cover to mitigate water pollution or for other
purposes described in these rules.
G. Vegetation: The operator
shall plant and maintain vegetative growth on all completed areas.
2.3.5 Water Pollution
A. General:
1. No sanitary landfill shall
be operated so as to cause or to be likely to cause pollution of the
ground waters or surface waters of the State at or beyond the
boundary of the licensed area of the sanitary landfill.
2. For purposes of these
rules, groundwater monitoring well results taken pursuant to §§
2.1.8 and 2.3.11 of this Part shall be deemed to be indicative of
results of ground water beyond the property line of the sanitary
landfill, in the absence of actual groundwater results at or beyond
such property line.
3. In determining whether said
operation of a sanitary landfill is causing or is likely to cause
pollution of the ground waters or the surface waters of the State,
the Director may consider the following factors:
a. Groundwater monitoring
results from the licensed area of the sanitary landfill show
significant statistical increases in excess of any one or more of the
parameters as delineated in § 2.3.26 of this Part.
b. Groundwater monitoring
results from the facility show detection of one or more of the
parameters as delineated in § 2.3.27 of this Part.
c. Topography, hydrology and
geology of the area encompassing the sanitary landfill indicates a
likelihood of contamination of a surface water body or groundwater.
d. Groundwater leaving the
licensed area is likely to impact private or public drinking wells
down gradient from the facility.
e. Groundwater leaving the
licensed area is likely to impact groundwater used for commercial or
industrial processes down gradient from the facility.
f. Facility violates a
groundwater standard.
g. An actual or potential
discharge into any surface water.
4. In the event that the
Director finds that the operation of a sanitary landfill is causing
or is likely to cause pollution of the groundwaters or the surface
waters of the State, the Director may evaluate the operation of said
sanitary landfill and require such measures as are necessary to
abate, eliminate or avoid such pollution, including, but not limited
to, the following:
a. Groundwater removal and
treatment
b. Contaminated groundwater
encapsulation
c. Alternate sources of
drinking water to impacted individuals
d. The limiting or exclusion
of surface water percolation into refuse filled areas
e. Identification and closure
of a particular cell or portion of the facility that is causing the
pollution.
f. Closure of the facility
B. Surface Water:
1. No new sanitary landfill
shall be conducted within the watershed of any surface public water
supply. Furthermore, no refuse shall be deposited within two hundred
(200) feet of any surface water or within twelve hundred (1200) feet
on any river per R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-18.9-9.1. Other landfill siting
prohibitions, relative to surface water shall also apply, per R.I.
Gen. Laws § 23-18.9-9.1.
2. New sanitary landfills
shall not be located on drainage areas of surface public water
supplies.
C. Groundwater:
1. No sanitary landfill shall
be constructed where solid waste may be in direct contact with
groundwaters of the State. A minimum of five (5) feet of soil is
required between the highest water table level and the lowest level
of the liner system. At the Director's discretion, a greater
separation may be required.
2. Sanitary landfills shall
not be located within four hundred (400) feet of an existing public
water supply well. At the Director's discretion, a greater separation
may be required.
3. Other landfill siting
prohibitions, relative to groundwater issues shall also apply, per
R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-18.9-9.1 and per Rule 8, "Prohibitions"
of the Department's "Groundwater Quality Rules".
D. Groundwater Reservoirs and
Recharge Areas:
1. As provided in R.I. Gen.
Laws § 23-18.9-9.1, no person shall dispose of solid waste on or in
the ground overlying groundwater reservoirs or groundwater recharge
areas, provided that such groundwater reservoirs or groundwater
recharge areas have been designated on the basis of hydrogeologic
data as an existing or planned public drinking water source by the
municipality in which such reservoir or recharge area is located, and
that such municipality has enacted a municipal ordinance relating to
groundwater reservoirs or groundwater recharge areas.
2. Where an existing solid
waste management landfill overlies such groundwater reservoir or
groundwater recharge area designated by the municipality in
accordance with § 2.3.5(D)(1) of this Part, the Director is
authorized to order cessation of solid waste disposal operations and
closure of said landfill under the following conditions:
a. The municipality has, after
notice and public hearing and resolution to the Director, requested
the Director to determine whether the continued operation of any
solid waste management facility-landfill on or over any such
reservoir or recharge area presents a hazard to the public drinking
water source.
b. The Director, after the
investigation, notice and hearing to said landfill, determines that
such existing solid waste management facility-landfill does present a
hazard to the public drinking water source.
2.3.6 Waste Handling:
A. Unloading of Waste: The
unloading of solid waste shall be controlled and restricted to an
area such that the material can easily be incorporated into the
working face.
B. Spreading and Compacting of
Waste: Solid waste shall be spread in layers of approximately two (2)
feet in depth and compacted with a minimum of four passes of the
compaction equipment.
C. Litter: Windblown refuse
shall be eliminated or controlled by using fences or other means. The
sanitary landfill shall be kept free of windblown refuse at all
times.
D. Handling of Special Waste:
1. Bulky waste: Bulky waste
shall be disposed of in accordance with the requirements of § 1.7(E)
of this Subchapter, at the toe of the working face and incorporated
into the working cell, or stored in a separate area of the landfill
approved by the Department for the purpose of salvaging these items.
Any salvaged material must be stored in closed-top containers for a
period approved by the Department.
2. Construction waste and
demolition waste: All construction waste and demolition waste shall
be disposed of by covering along with daily refuse.
3. Brush: Any brush accepted
at a sanitary landfill must be stored at a minimum distance of two
hundred (200) feet from the working face, or buried. All brush not
buried must be chipped within one (1) week after arrival. Chipped
brush may be stored indefinitely in this area.
4. Non-hazardous liquid waste:
a. Non-hazardous liquid waste
shall be disposed of in a sanitary landfill only if special
provisions are made for such disposal and are approved by the
Department.
b. Any non-hazardous liquid
waste accepted for disposal shall be covered immediately after it is
dumped at any sanitary landfill. No uncovered pools of these
materials will be allowed at any time.
c. Bulk or non-containerized
liquid waste cannot be landfilled unless:
(1) The waste is household
waste other than septic waste or
(2) The waste is leachate or
gas condensate (liquid from gas recover processes) derived from the
SWLF unit and the SWLF unit, regardless of whether it is a new or
existing SWLF unit or a lateral expansion of an SWLF unit, is
designed with at least a double composite liner and leachate
collection system. (These design details must be demonstrated in the
landfill's operating record and the Director must be notified that
these design details have been placed in the operating record).
d. Containerized liquid waste
may not be placed in solid waste landfills, unless:
(1) The waste is household
waste or
(2) The container is small and
similar in size to that normally used for containing household waste.
5. Oil spill cleanup debris:
Oil spill cleanup debris shall be disposed of only in a sanitary
landfill constructed with a liner system per § 2.2 of this Part, or
in an alternate facility approved by the Department.
6. Asbestos disposal:
a. Friable asbestos material
shall not be disposed in a sanitary landfill unless the operator of
the sanitary landfill has received specific approval from the
Director to accept such material. This approval shall be granted
based on, but not necessarily limited to, the amount of refuse
accepted at the landfill, the equipment and personnel available, and
the need for asbestos disposal facilities. This approval may be
revoked by the Director at any time.
b. Friable asbestos material
must be treated with water and labeled or processed into a
non-friable form according to 40 C.F.R. § 61.150 (a)(1) (2017),
incorporated in § 1.3(A) of this Subchapter.
c. Asbestos material accepted
at a sanitary landfill shall be placed at the bottom of the working
face and immediately covered with either a minimum of two (2) feet of
refuse or a minimum of six (6) inches of clean fill.
d. There shall be no visible
emissions of asbestos material from any sanitary landfill which has
accepted asbestos material.
e. Landfilling of friable
asbestos material must comply with all applicable requirements of the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants asbestos
regulations (40 C.F.R. § 61, Subpart M) (2017), incorporated in §
1.3(A) of this Subchapter.
E. SWLF unit owners or
operators must implement a program at the facility for detecting and
preventing the disposal of regulated hazardous wastes and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) wastes. This program must, include,
at minimum:
1. Random inspections of
incoming loads, unless the SWLF owner or operator takes other steps
to ensure that incoming loads do not contain regulated hazardous
wastes or PCB wastes.
2. Records of any inspections
of incoming loads.
3. Training of facility
personnel to recognize regulated hazardous wastes and PCB wastes.
4. Notification of the
Director if a regulated hazardous waste or PCB waste is discovered at
the facility.
2.3.7 Equipment
Requirements
A. General Requirements: All
equipment used shall meet the performance specifications necessary
for operating the sanitary landfill in accordance with the operating
requirements contained in these regulations.
B. Required Equipment for
Refuse and Cover Material Handling: There shall be sufficient types
and quantities of equipment for digging, spreading, compacting, or
covering waste or applying cover material to adequately meet the
requirements of these regulations.
C. Each piece of equipment
must have a minimum basic weight without blade, bucket or other
accessories of 17,000 pounds.
D. Equipment breakdown:
Arrangements in writing for emergency equipment shall be made to
allow for operating equipment breakdown. Emergency equipment shall be
on the site with twenty-four (24) hours of operating equipment
breakdown.
2.3.8 Gas Control
A. The concentration of
methane gas generated by the facility does not exceed 25 percent of
the lower explosive limit for methane in facility structures
(excluding gas control or recovery system components).
B. The concentration of
methane gas does not exceed 25 percent of the lower explosive limit
for methane at the facility property boundary.
C. Sanitary landfills must
implement a routine methane monitoring program to ensure compliance
with §§ 2.3.8(A) and (B) of this Part.
1. The type and frequency of
monitoring must be determined based on the following factors:
a. Soil conditions
b. The hydrogeologic
conditions surrounding the facility
c. The hydraulic conditions
surrounding the facility
d. The location of facility
structures and property boundaries.
2. The minimum frequency of
monitoring shall be quarterly.
D. If methane gas levels
exceeding the limits specified in §§ 2.3.8(A) and (B) of this Part
are detected, the facility must:
1. Immediately take all
necessary steps to ensure protection of human health and notify the
Department.
2. Within seven (7) days of
detection, place in the operating plan the methane gas levels
detected and a description of the steps taken to protect human
health.
3. Within 60 days of
detection, implement a remediation plan for the methane gas releases,
place a copy of the plan in the operating plan, and notify the
Department that the plan has been implemented. The plan shall
describe the nature and extent of the problem and the proposed
remedy.
E. For purposes of this
section, lower explosive limit means the lowest percent by volume of
a mixture of explosive gases in air that will propagate a flame at
25ºC and atmospheric pressure.
2.3.9 Fire Protection:
A. A facility shall not pose a
hazard to the safety of persons or property from fires. In addition,
the following requirements must be met:
B. All sanitary landfills
shall arrange in writing for a nearby fire department to provide
emergency service whenever called.
C. There shall be within 1,000
feet of the working face, either an adequate supply of water under
pressure or a stockpile of the equivalent of four days cover material
for use exclusively in fighting fires.
D. All landfill equipment
(dozer, front end loaders and landfill compactors) shall be supplied
with fire extinguishers.
2.3.10 Surface Drainage:
The operator shall make
provisions to have the sanitary landfill site, including the fill
surface, graded and provided with a drainage system to minimize
surface water runoff onto and into the fill, to prevent erosion of
the fill, to drain off rain water falling on the fill, and to prevent
the collection of standing water. The surface drainage system must be
designed to control the water volume from a 24-hour, 25-year storm.
Measures must be taken to prevent sedimentation associated with
surface drainage from borrow areas and other disturbed areas. The
minimum top surface slopes shall be three percent. The maximum side
slopes shall be no steeper than 3/1.
2.3.11 Monitoring Wells:
A. Sanitary landfills shall
install monitoring wells at locations approved by the Department
based on the hydrogeological report and water quality monitoring plan
submitted per § 2.1.8 of this Part for the purpose of monitoring
groundwater conditions. The operator shall arrange for the sampling
and analysis for constituents designated by the Director on a
schedule as determined by the Director. The operator shall notify the
Director at least 48 hours prior to sampling groundwater monitoring
wells. The Director may, at his discretion, sample such groundwater
monitoring wells pursuant to § 2.1.8 of this Part.
B. New sanitary landfills
shall conduct preliminary sampling and analysis for constituents
designated by the Director prior to commencing operation of the
facility, and pursuant to § 2.1.8 of this Part.
2.3.12 Distance to Property
Lines:
No refuse shall be disposed
of within six hundred (600) feet of any property line. No excavations
shall occur within six hundred (600) feet of any property line. The
Director may, at his discretion, require a greater distance in order
to meet the operational requirements of §§ 2.2 and 2.3 of this
Part. Existing sanitary landfills may continue to operate within the
200-foot buffer rule only in areas approved in their existing license
and operating plan.
2.3.13 Limited Access:
Dumping of any solid waste at
a sanitary landfill after one-half hour past sunset will not be
allowed.
2.3.14 Flood Plain,
Wetlands, and Coastal Restrictions:
A. No refuse shall be
deposited in the one hundred (100) year flood plain.
B. New SWLF units and lateral
expansions of SWLF units shall not be located in wetlands (as defined
in 40 C.F.R. § 232.2(r) (2017), incorporated in § 1.3(A) of this
Subchapter and in the Department's "Rules and Regulations
Governing the Administration and Enforcement of the Fresh Water
Wetlands Act", or constructed in a manner that will alter
wetlands, except if a permit to alter a freshwater wetlands is
received from the Office of Water Resources and, when required, by
the Coastal Resources Management Council:
1. Where applicable under the
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344, or applicable State wetlands
laws, the presumption that practicable alternative to the proposed
landfill is available which does not involve wetlands is clearly
rebutted;
2. The construction and
operation of the SWLF unit will not:
a. Cause or contribute to
violations of any applicable State water quality standard.
b. Violate any applicable
toxic effluent standard or prohibition under the Clean Water Act, 33
U.S.C. § 1317,
c. Jeopardize the continued
existence of endangered or threatened species or result in
destruction or adverse modification of a critical habitat, protected
under The Endangered Species Act of 1973, and
d. Violate any requirement
under the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972
for the protection of a marine sanctuary.
3. The SWLF unit will not
cause or contribute to significant degradation of wetlands. The owner
or operator must demonstrate the integrity of the SWLF unit and its
ability to protect ecological resources by addressing the following
factors:
a. Erosion, stability, and
migration potential of native wetland soils, muds, and deposits used
to support the SWLF unit,
b. Erosion, stability, and
migration potential of dredged and fill materials used to support the
SWLF unit,
c. The volume and chemical
nature of the waste managed in the SWLF unit,
d. Impacts on fish, wildlife,
and other aquatic resources and their habitat from release of the
solid waste or operation of the SWLF unit,
e. The potential effects of
catastrophic release of waste to the wetland and the resulting
impacts on the environment, and
f. Any additional factors as
necessary, to demonstrate that ecological resources in the wetlands
are sufficiently protected.
4. To the extent required
under 33 U.S.C. § 1344, or applicable State wetlands laws, steps
have been taken to attempt to achieve no net loss of wetlands (as
defined by acreage and function) by first avoiding impacts to
wetlands to the maximum extent practicable as required by §
2.3.14(B)(1) of this Part, then minimizing unavoidable impacts to the
maximum extent practicable, and finally offsetting remaining
unavoidable wetland impacts through all appropriate and practicable
compensatory mitigation actions (e.g. restoration of existing
degraded wetlands or creation of man-made wetlands), and
5. Sufficient information is
available to make a reasonable determination with respect to these
demonstrations.
C. Coastal prohibitions, per
R.I. Gen. Laws § 23-18.9-9.1, shall also apply to the siting of
sanitary landfills.
2.3.15 Deed
Restrictions/Conservation Easement:
A. Prior to any waste
disposal, the operator shall insure that notations are properly made
upon the deed for the disposal site land. The notation shall be
amended as frequently as necessary to insure that all sites are
properly documented. No license renewal shall be granted until the
operator demonstrates that such notation has been made and/or
updated. Such notation shall include:
1. Type of waste disposed of
at the site;
2. The exact location of such
waste shown on a map with a legend;
3. Notice that excavation of
previously filled areas shall not be conducted without prior written
approval from the Department.
2.3.16 Height Monitoring:
An annual survey of the
landfill height shall be taken by a properly licensed Rhode Island
land surveyor or professional engineer. This survey shall be
submitted to the Department within thirty (30) days after the survey.
Once the facility is within eighty (80) percent of its proposed final
site elevation, the Department may require more frequent surveys as
necessary to ensure such elevation is not exceeded.
2.3.17 Excavation:
No person shall excavate
previously filled areas without prior written approval from the
Director.
2.3.18 Resource Recovery
and Solid Waste Incinerator Ash Residue Monofills:
A. Landfills used solely for
the disposal of solid waste resulting from Resource Recovery and
Incineration operations are subject to all requirements of these
regulations.
B. Each application for a
license to construct and operate an ash residue landfill must meet
all requirements set forth in § 1.6 of this Subchapter and § 2.1 of
this Part.
C. All ash residue monofills
are subject to all operating and design regulations set forth in §
1.7 of this Subchapter, §§ 2.2 and 2.3 of this Part with the
exception of the gas venting requirements specified in § 2.3.8 of
this Part.
2.3.19 Airport Safety:
Owners or operators of new
SWLF units, existing SWLF units and their lateral expansions that are
located within 10,000 feet (3,048 meters) of any airport runway end
used by turbojet aircraft or within 5,000 feet (1524 meters) of any
airport runway end used by only piston type aircraft shall
demonstrate that their landfills are designed and operated so that
the landfills do not pose a bird hazard to aircraft. Each owner or
operator shall document demonstration of this design and operation in
its operating record and shall notify the Director of this
documenting action.
2.3.20 Fault Areas:
A. New SWLF units and lateral
expansions of SWLF units shall not be located within 200 feet (60
meters) of a fault that has had displacement in Holocene time unless
the owner or operator demonstrates to the Director that an
alternative setback distance of less than 200 feet (60 meters) will
prevent damage to the structural integrity of the SWLF unit and will
be protective of human health and the environment where:
1. "Fault" means a
fracture or a zone of fractures in any material along which strata on
one side have been displaced with respect to that on the other side.
2. "Displacement"
means the relative movement of any two sides of a fault measured in
any direction.
3. "Holocene" means
the most recent epoch of the Quaternary period, extending from the
end of the Pleistocene Epoch to the present.
2.3.21 Seismic Impact
Zones:
A. New SWLF units and lateral
expansions of SWLF units shall not be located in seismic impact
zones, unless the owner or operator demonstrates to the Director that
all containment structures, including liners, leachate collection
systems, and surface water control systems, are designed to resist
the maximum horizontal acceleration in lithified earth material for
the site. The owner or operator shall place this demonstration in the
operating record and notify the Director that it has been placed in
the operating record, and where:
1. "Seismic impact zone"
means an area with a ten percent or greater probability that the
maximum horizontal acceleration in lithified earth material,
expressed as a percentage of the earth's gravitational pull will
exceed 0.10 g in 250 years.
2. "Maximum horizontal
acceleration in lithified earth material" means the maximum
expected horizontal acceleration depicted on a seismic hazard map,
with a 90 percent or greater probability that this acceleration will
not be exceeded in 250 years or it means the maximum expected
horizontal acceleration based on a site-specific seismic risk
assessment.
3. "Lithified earth
material" means all rock, including all naturally occurring and
naturally formed aggregates or masses of minerals or small particles
of older rock that formed by crystallization of magma or by
induration of loose sediments. This term does not include man-made
materials, such as fill, concrete, asphalt, or unconsolidated earth
materials, soil, or regolith lying at or near the earth surface.
2.3.22 Unstable Areas:
A. Owners or operators of new
SWLF units, existing SWLF units, and lateral expansions of SWLF units
located in unstable areas must demonstrate that engineering measures
have been incorporated into the SWLF unit's design to ensure that the
integrity of the structural components of the SWLF Unit will not be
disrupted. The owner or operator must place this demonstration in the
operating record and notify the Director that it has been placed in
the operating record.
1. "Unstable area"
means a location that is susceptible to natural or human induced
events or forces capable of impairing the integrity of some or all of
the landfill structural components responsible for preventing
releases from a landfill. Unstable areas can include poor foundation
conditions, areas susceptible to mass movements, and Karst Terranes.
2. "Structural
components" means liners, leachate collection systems, final
covers, run-on/run-off systems and any other component used in the
construction and operation of the SWLF that is necessary for
protection of human health and the environment.
3. "Poor foundation
conditions" means those areas where features exist which
indicate that a natural or man-induced event may result in inadequate
foundation support for the structural components of a SWLF unit.
4. "Areas susceptible to
mass movement" means those areas of influence (i.e., areas
characterized as having an active or substantial possibility of mass
movement) where the movement of earth material at, beneath, or
adjacent to the SWLF unit, because of natural or man-induced events,
results in the downslope transport of soil and rock material by means
of gravitational influence. Areas of mass movement include, but are
not limited to, landslides, avalanches, debris slides and floods,
solifluction, block sliding, and rock fall.
5. "Karst terranes"
means areas where karst topography, with its characteristic surface
and subterranean features, is developed as the result of dissolution
of limestone, dolomite, or other soluble rock. Characteristic
physiographic features present in karst terranes include but are not
limited to, sinkholes, sinking streams, caves, large springs, and
blind valleys.
B. The owner or operator shall
consider the following factors, at a minimum, when determining
whether an area is unstable:
1. On-site or local soil
conditions that may result in significant differential settling;
2. On-site or local geologic
or geomorphologic features; and
3. On-site or local human-made
features or events (both surface and subsurface.)
2.3.23 Closure of Existing
Solid Waste Landfill Units in Unstable Areas:
A. Any existing SWLF unit that
is sited in an unstable area shall close or may continue to operate
based on the following criteria:
1. It shall be allowed to
continue to operate, provided it can demonstrate to the Director that
engineering measures have been incorporated in its design to ensure
the structural components of the landfill will not be disrupted.
2. If it cannot demonstrate to
the Director that engineering measures have been incorporated in its
design to ensure the structural components of the landfill will not
be disrupted, then:
a. It shall close by 9 October
1998, provided it can demonstrate to the Director, that there is no
available alternative disposal capacity and that there is no
immediate threat to human health and the environment; otherwise,
b. It shall close by 9 October
1996.
2.3.24 Post-Closure Care:
Post-closure care shall be
carried out in accordance with the requirements of §§ 2.1.9(B) and
(C) of this Part. Following completion of the post-closure period,
the landfill owner or operator shall submit to the Department a copy
of a certification signed by an independent registered professional
engineer or approved by the Director, verifying that post-closure
care has been completed in accordance with the post-closure plan and
that this certification has been placed in the landfill's operating
record.
2.3.25 Record keeping
Requirements for SWLF units:
A. The landfill owner or
operator must record and retain near the facility in a operating
record or in an alternate location approved by the Director, the
following information as it becomes available:
1. Any location restriction
documentation required, per § 2.3 of this Part and its subsections.
2. Waste inspections records,
training procedures, and notification procedures required in §
2.3.6(E) of this Part.
3. Gas monitoring results and
any remediation plans required by § 2.3.8 of this Part.
4. Any SWLF unit design
documentation for placement of leachate or gas condensate in the
landfill, per § 2.3.6(D)(4) of this Part.
5. Any groundwater
demonstration, certification, finding, monitoring, testing, or
analytical data required by § 2.1.8 of this Part and its
sub-sections.
6. Closure and post-closure
care plans and any monitoring, testing or analytical data required by
§§ 2.1.9 and 2.3.4(C) of this Part.
7. Any cost estimate and
financial assurance documentation required by §§ 2.1.9(E), (F), and
2.3.26(D) of this Part.
B. The landfill owner or
operator must notify the Director when the documents from §
2.3.25(A) of this Part have been placed or added to the landfill's
operating record, and all information contained in the operating
record must be furnished upon request to the Director or be made
available at all reasonable times for inspection by the Director.
C. The landfill owner or
operator shall retain all records required in § 2.3.25 of this Part
for the life of the facility, to include the closure and post-closure
care periods.
D. Per R.I. Gen. Laws §
23-18.9-12, any private landfill operator shall keep a written record
of the vehicles which unload cargo at the landfill. The record shall
contain the date and time of unloading of the cargo, a description of
the cargo, as well as the vehicle registration. The landfill operator
shall, upon request, make the written record available for inspection
by the Department.
2.3.26 Constituents for
Detection Monitoring
Common
name
CAS
RN?
Chemical
Abstract Service registry number
Common
names are those widely used in government regulations, scientific
publications, and commerce; synonyms exist for many chemicals).
Where
“Total” is entered, all species in the ground water that
contain this element are included.
Inorganic
Constituents:
(1)
Antimony
(Total)
(2)
Arsenic
(Total)
(3)
Barium
(Total)
(4)
Beryllium
(Total)
(5)
Cadmium
(Total)
(6)
Chromium
(Total)
(7)
Cobalt
(Total)
(8)
Copper
(Total)
(9)
Lead
(Total)
(10)
Nickel
(Total)
(11)
Selenium
(Total)
(12)
Silver
(Total)
(13)
Thallium
(Total)
(14)
Vanadium
(Total)
(15)
Zinc
(Total)
Organic
Constituents:
(16)
Acetone
67-64-1
(17)
Acrylonitrile
107-13-1
(18)
Benzene
71-43-2
(19)
Bromochloromethane
74-97-5
(20)
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
(21)
Bromoform; Tribromomethane
75-25-2
(22)
Carbon disulfide
75-15-0
(23)
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
(24)
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
(25)
Chloroethane; Ethyl chloride
75-00-3
(26)
Chloroform; Trichloromethane
67-66-3
(27)
Dibromochloromethane; Chlorodibromomethane
124-48-1
(28)
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane; DBCP
96-12-8
(29)
1,2-Dibromoethane; Ethylene dibromide; EDB
106-93-4
(30)
o-Dichlorobenzene; 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
(31)
p-Dichlorobenzene; 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
(32)
trans-1, 4-Dichloro-2-butene
110-57-6
(33)
1,1-Dichlorethane; Ethylidene chloride
75-34-3
(34)
1,2-Dichlorethane; Ethylene dichloride
107-06-2
(35)
1,1-Dichloroethylene; 1,1-Dichloroethene; Vinylidene chloride
75-35-4
(36)
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene; cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-59-2
(37)
trans-1, 2-Dichloroethylene; trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
(38)
1,2-Dichloropropane; Propylene dichloride
78-87-5
(39)
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
(40)
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
(41)
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
(42)
2-Hexanone; Methyl butyl ketone
591-78-6
(43)
Methyl bromide; Bromomethane
74-83-9
(44)
Methyl chloride; Chloromethane
74-87-3
(45)
Methylene bromide; Dibromomethane
74-95-3
(46)
Methylene chloride; Dichloromethane
75-09-2
(47)
Methyl ethyl ketone; MEK; 2-Butanone
78-93-3
(48)
Methyl iodide; Idomethane
74-88-4
(49)
4-Methyl-2-pentanone; Methyl isobutyl ketone
108-10-1
(50)
Styrene
100-42-5
(51)
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
630-20-6
(52)
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
(53)
Tetrachloroethylene; Tetrachloroethene; Perchloroethylene
127-18-4
(54)
Toluene
108-88-3
(55)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane; Methylchloroform
71-55-6
(56)
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
(57)
Trichloroethylene; Trichloroethene
79-01-6
(58)
Trichlorofluoromethane; CFC-11
75-69-4
(59)
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
96-18-4
(60)
Vinyl acetate
108-05-4
(61)
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
(62)
Xylenes
1330-20-7
2.3.27 List of Hazardous
Inorganic and Organic Constituents
Common
name (those widely used in government regulations, scientific
publications, and commerce; synonyms exist for many chemicals)
CAS
RN
Chemical
Abstracts Service registry number
Chemical
abstracts service index name (those used in the 9th Cumulative
Index)
Where
“Total” is entered for CAS RN, all species in the ground water
that contain this element are included.
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
Acenaphthylene,
1,2-dihydro-
Acenaphthylene
208-96-8
Acenaphthylene
Acetone
67-64-1
2-Propanone
Acetonitrile;
Methyl cyanide
75-05-8
Acetonitrile
Acetophenone
98-86-2
Ethanone,
1-phenyl-
2-Acetylaminofluorene;
2-AAF
53-96-3
Acetamide,
N-9H-fluoren-2-yl-
Acrolein
107-02-8
2-Propenal
Acrylonitrile
107-13-1
2-Propenenitrile
Aldrin
309-00-2
1,4:5,8-Dimethanonaphthalene,
1,2,3,4,10,10-hexachloro-1,4,4a,5,8,8a-hexahydro-(1,4,4a,5,8,8a)-
Allyl
chloride
107-05-1
1-Propene,
3-chloro-
4-Aminobiphenyl
92-67-1
[1,1?-Biphenyl]-4-amine
Anthracene
120-12-7
Anthracene
Antimony
(Total)
Antimony
Arsenic
(Total)
Arsenic
Barium
(Total)
Barium
Benzene
71-43-2
Benzene
Benzo[a]anthracene;
Benzanthracene
56-55-3
Benz[a]anthracene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
205-99-2
Benz[e]acephenanthrylene
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
207-08-9
Benzo[k]fluoranthene
Benzo[ghi]perylene
191-24-2
Benzo[ghi]perylene
Benzo[a]pyrene
50-32-8
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzyl
alcohol
100-51-6
Benzenemethanol
Beryllium
(Total)
Beryllium
alpha-BHC
319-84-6
Cyclohexane,
1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachloro-,(1?,2?,3?,4?,5?,6?)-
beta-BHC
319-85-7
Cyclohexane,
1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachloro-,(1?,2?,3?,4?,5?,6?)-
delta-BHC
319-86-8
Cyclohexane,
1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachloro-,(1?,2?,3?,4?,5?,6?)-
gamma-BHC;
Lindane
58-89-9
Cyclohexane,
1,2,3,4,5,6- hexachloro-,(1?,2?, 3?, 4?,5?,6?)-
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
Ethane,
1,1?-[methylenebis (oxy)]bis [2-chloro-
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether;
Dichloroethyl ether
111-44-4
Ethane,
1,1?-oxybis[2-chloro-
Bis(2-chloro-1-methylethyl)
ether; 2,2?-Dichlorodiisopropyl ether; DCIP
This
substance is often called bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether, the name
Chemical Abstracts Service applies to its noncommercial isomer,
propane, 2,2?-oxybis[2-chloro-(CAS RN 39638-32-9).
108-60-1
Propane,
2,2?-oxybis[1-chloro-
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate
117-81-7
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic
acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl)ester
Bromochloromethane;
Chlorobromethane
74-97-5
Methane,
bromochloro-
Bromodichloromethane;
Dibromochloromethane
75-27-4
Methane,
bromodichloro-
Bromoform;
Tribromomethane
75-25-2
Methane,
tribromo-
4-Bromophenyl
phenyl ether
101-55-3
Benzene,
1-bromo-4-phenoxy-
Butyl
benzyl phthalate; Benzyl butyl phthalate
85-68-7
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic
acid, butyl phenylmethyl ester
Cadmium
(Total)
Cadmium
Carbon
disulfide
75-15-0
Carbon
disulfide
Carbon
tetrachloride
56-23-5
Methane,
tetrachloro-
Chlordane
This
entry includes alpha-chlordane (CAS RN 5103-71-9), beta-chlordane
(CAS RN 5103-74-2), gamma-chlordane (CAS RN 5566-34-7), and
constituents of chlordane (CAS RN 57-74-9 and CAS RN 12789-03-6).
5103-71-9
see adjacent note
4,7-Methano-1H-indene,
1,2,4,5,6,7,8,8-octachloro-2,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro-
p-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
Benzenamine,
4-chloro-
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
Benzene,
chloro-
Chlorobenzilate
510-15-6
Benzeneacetic
acid, 4-chloro--(4-chlorophenyl)- -hydroxy-, ethyl ester.
p-Chloro-m-cresol;
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
59-50-7
Phenol,
4-chloro-3-methyl-
Chloroethane;
Ethyl chloride
75-00-3
Ethane,
chloro-
Chloroform;
Trichloromethane
67-66-3
Methane,
trichloro-
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
Naphthalene,
2-chloro-
2-Chlorophenol
95-57-8
Phenol,
2-chloro-
4-Chlorophenyl
phenyl ether
7005-72-3
Benzene,
1-chloro-4-phenoxy-
Chloroprene
126-99-8
1,3-Butadiene,
2-chloro-
Chromium
(Total)
Chromium
Chrysene
218-01-9
Chrysene
Cobalt
(Total)
Cobalt
Copper
(Total)
Copper
m-Cresol;
3-Methylphenol
108-39-4
Phenol,
3-methyl-
o-Cresol;
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
Phenol,
2-methyl-
p-Cresol;
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
Phenol,
4-methyl-
Cyanide
57-12-5
Cyanide
2,4-D;
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
94-75-7
Acetic
acid, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-
4,4?-DDD
72-54-8
Benzene
1,1?-(2,2-dichloroethylidene) bis[4-chloro-
4,4?-DDE
72-55-9
Benzene,
1,1?-(dichloroethenylidene) bis[4-chloro-
4,4?-DDT
50-29-3
Benzene,
1,1?-(2,2,2-trichloroethylidene) bis[4-chloro-
Diallate
2303-16-4
Carbamothioic
acid, bis(1-methylethyl)-, S- (2,3-dichloro-2-propenyl) ester.
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
53-70-3
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
Dibenzofuran
132-64-9
Dibenzofuran
Dibromochloromethane;
Chlorodibromomethane
124-48-1
Methane,
dibromochloro-
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane;
DBCP
96-12-8
Propane,
1,2-dibromo-3-chloro-
1,2-Dibromoethane;
Ethylene dibromide; EDB
106-93-4
Ethane,
1,2-dibromo-
Di-n-butyl
phthalate
84-74-2
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic
acid, dibutyl ester
o-Dichlorobenzene;
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
Benzene,
1,2-dichloro-
m-Dichlorobenzene;
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
Benzene,
1,3-dichloro-
p-Dichlorobenzene;
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
Benzene,
1,4-dichloro-
3,3?-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
[1,1?-Biphenyl]-4,4?-diamine,
3,3?-dichloro-
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
110-57-6
2-Butene,
1,4-dichloro-, (E)-
Dichlorodifluoromethane;
CFC 12
75-71-8
Methane,
dichlorodifluoro-
1,1-Dichloroethane;
Ethyldidene chloride
75-34-3
Ethane,
1,1-dichloro-
1,2-Dichloroethane;
Ethylene dichloride
107-06-2
Ethane,
1,2-dichloro-
1,1-Dichloroethylene;
1,1-Dichloroethene;
75-35-4
Ethene,
1,1-dichloro-
Vinylidene
chloride cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene; cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-59-2
Ethene,
1,2-dichloro-(Z)-
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene;
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
Ethene,
1,2-dichloro-, (E)-
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
Phenol,
2,4-dichloro-
2,6-Dichlorophenol
87-65-0
Phenol,
2,6-dichloro-
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
Propane,
1,2-dichloro-
1,3-Dichloropropane;
Trimethylene dichloride
142-28-9
Propane,
1,3-dichloro-
2,2-Dichloropropane;
Isopropylidene chloride
594-20-7
Propane,
2,2-dichloro-
1,1-Dichloropropene
563-58-6
1-Propene,
1,1-dichloro-
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
1-Propene,
1,3-dichloro-, (Z)-
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
1-Propene,
1,3-dichloro-, (E)-
Dieldrin
60-57-1
2,7:3,6-Dimethanonaphth
[2,3-b]oxirene,
3,4,5,6,9,9-hexachloro-1a,2,2a,3,6,6a,7,7a-octahydro-,
(1a?,2?,2a?,3?,6?,6a?,7?,7a?)-
Diethyl
phthalate
84-66-2
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic
acid, diethyl ester
O,O-Diethyl
O-2-pyrazinyl phosphorothioate; Thionazin
297-97-2
Phosphorothioic
acid, O,O-diethyl O-pyrazinyl ester.
Dimethoate
60-51-5
Phosphorodithioic
acid, O,O-dimethyl S-[2-(methylamino)-2-oxoethyl] ester
p-(Dimethylamino)azobenzene
60-11-7
Benzenamine,
N,N-dimethyl-4-(phenylazo)-
7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene
57-97-6
Benz[a]anthracene,
7,12-dimethyl-
3,3?-Dimethylbenzidine
119-93-7
[1,1?-Biphenyl]-4,4?-diamine,
3,3?-dimethyl-
alpha,
alpha-Dimethylphenethylamine
122-09-8
Benzeneethanamine,
?,?-dimethyl-
2,4-Dimethylphenol;
m-Xylenol
105-67-9
Phenol,
2,4-dimethyl-
Dimethyl
phthalate
131-11-3
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic
acid, dimethyl ester
m-Dinitrobenzene
99-65-0
Benzene,
1,3-dinitro-
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol;
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
534-52-1
Phenol,
2-methyl-4,6-dinitro-
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
Phenol,
2,4-dinitro-
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
Benzene,
1-methyl-2,4-dinitro-
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
Benzene,
2-methyl-1,3-dinitro-
Dinoseb;
DNBP; 2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
88-85-7
Phenol,
2-(1-methylpropyl)-4,6-dinitro-
Di-n-octyl
phthalate
117-84-0
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic
acid, dioctyl ester
Diphenylamine
122-39-4
Benzenamine,
N-phenyl-
Disulfoton
298-04-4
Phosphorodithioic
acid, O,O-diethyl S-[2- (ethylthio)ethyl] ester
Endosulfan
I
959-98-8
6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodiox-athiepin,
6,7,8,9,10,10-hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide,
Endosulfan
II
33213-65-9
6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin,
6,7,8,9,10,10-hexachloro- 1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3-oxide,
(3?,5a?,6?,9?, 9a?)-
Endosulfan
sulfate
1031-07-8
6,9-Methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin,
6,7,8,9,10,10-hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-, 3,3-dioxide
Endrin
72-20-8
2,7:3,6-Dimethanonaphth[2,3-b]oxirene,
3,4,5,6,9,9-hexachloro-1a,2,2a,3,6,6a,7,7a-octahydro-, (1a?,
2?,2a?, 3?,6?,6a?,7?,7a?)-
Endrin
aldehyde
7421-93-4
1,2,4-Methenocyclo-penta[cd]pentalene-5-carboxaldehyde,2,2a,3,3,4,7-hexachlorodecahydro-
(1?,2?,2a?,4?,4a?,5?,6a?,6b?,7R*)-
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
Benzene,
ethyl-
Ethyl
methacrylate
97-63-2
2-Propenoic
acid, 2-methyl-, ethyl ester
Ethyl
methanesulfonate
62-50-0
Methanesulfonic
acid, ethyl ester
Famphur
52-85-7
Phosphorothioic
acid, O-[4-[(dimethylamino)sulfonyl]phenyl]-O,O-dimethyl ester
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
86-73-7
9H-Fluorene
Heptachlor
76-44-8
4,7-Methano-1H-indene,1,4,5,6,7,8,8-heptachloro-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-
Heptachlor
epoxide
1024-57-3
2,5-Methano-2H-indeno[1,2-b]oxirene,2,3,4,5,6,7,7-heptachloro-1a,1b,5,5a,6,6a,-hexahydro-,(1a?,1b?,2?,5?,5a?,6?,6a?)
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
Benzene,
hexachloro-
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
1,3-Butadiene,
1,1,2,3,4,4-hexachloro-
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
77-47-4
1,3-Cyclopentadiene,
1,2,3,4,5,5-hexachloro-
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
Ethane,
hexachloro-
Hexachloropropene
1888-71-7
1-Propene,
1,1,2,3,3,3-hexachloro-
2-Hexanone;
Methyl butyl ketone
591-78-6
2-Hexanone
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene
Isobutyl
alcohol
78-83-1
1-Propanol,
2-methyl-
Isodrin
465-73-6
1,4,5,8-Dimethanonaphthalene,1,2,3,4,1
0,10-hexachloro-1,4,4a,5,8,8a hexahydro-(1?, 4?, 4a?,5?,8?,8a?)-
Isophorone
78-59-1
2-Cyclohexen-1-one,
3,5,5-trimethyl-
Isosafrole
120-58-1
1,3-Benzodioxole,
5-(1-propenyl)-
Kepone
143-50-0
1,3,4-Metheno-2H-cyclobuta-[cd]pentalen-2-one,
1,1a,3,3a,4,5,5,5a,5b,6-decachlorooctahydro-
Lead
(Total)
Lead
Mercury
(Total)
Mercury
Methacrylonitrile
126-98-7
2-Propenenitrile,
2-methyl-
Methapyrilene
91-80-5
1,2,Ethanediamine,
N,N-dimethyl-N?-2-pyridinyl-N?-(2-thienylmethyl)-
Methoxychlor
72-43-5
Benzene,
1,1?-(2,2,2,trichloroethylidene)bis [4-methoxy-
Methyl
bromide; Bromomethane
74-83-9
Methane,
bromo-
Methyl
chloride; Chloromethane
74-87-3
Methane,
chloro-
3-Methylcholanthrene
56-49-5
Benz[j]aceanthrylene,
1,2-dihydro-3-methyl-
Methyl
ethyl ketone; MEK; 2-Butanone
78-93-3
2-Butanone
Methyl
iodide; Iodomethane
74-88-4
Methane,
iodo-
Methyl
methacrylate
80-62-6
2-Propenoic
acid, 2-methyl-, methyl ester
Methyl
methanesulfonate
66-27-3
Methanesulfonic
acid, methyl ester
2-Methylnaphthalene
91-57-6
Naphthalene,
2-methyl-
Methyl
parathion; Parathion methyl
298-00-0
Phosphorothioic
acid, O,O-dimethyl
4-Methyl-2-pentanone;
Methyl isobutyl ketone
108-10-1
2-Pentanone,
4-methyl-
Methylene
bromide; Dibromomethane
74-95-3
Methane,
dibromo-
Methylene
chloride; Dichloromethane
75-09-2
Methane,
dichloro-
Naphthalene
91-20-3
Naphthalene
1,4-Naphthoquinone
130-15-4
1,4-Naphthalenedione
1-Naphthylamine
134-32-7
1-Naphthalenamine
2-Naphthylamine
91-59-8
2-Naphthalenamine
Nickel
(Total)
Nickel
o-Nitroaniline;
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
Benzenamine,
2-nitro-
m-Nitroaniline;
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
Benzenamine,
3-nitro-
p-Nitroaniline;
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
Benzenamine,
4-nitro-
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
Benzene,
nitro-
o-Nitrophenol;
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
Phenol,
2-nitro-
p-Nitrophenol;
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
Phenol,
4-nitro-
N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine
924-16-3
1-Butanamine,
N-butyl-N-nitroso-
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
55-18-5
Ethanamine,
N-ethyl-N-nitroso-
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
62-75-9
Methanamine,
N-methyl-N-nitroso-
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
Benzenamine,
N-nitroso-N-phenyl-
N-Nitrosodipropylamine;
N-Nitroso-N-dipropylamine; Di-n-propylnitrosamine
621-64-7
1-Propanamine,
N-nitroso-N-propyl-
N-Nitrosomethylethalamine
10595-95-6
Ethanamine,
N-methyl-N-nitroso-
N-Nitrosopiperidine
100-75-4
Piperidine,
1-nitroso-
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
930-55-2
Pyrrolidine,
1-nitroso-
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
99-55-8
Benzenamine,
2-methyl-5-nitro-
Parathion
56-38-2
Phosphorothioic
acid, O,O-diethyl-O-(4-nitrophenyl) ester
Pentachlorobenzene
608-93-5
Benzene,
pentachloro-
Pentachloronitrobenzene
82-68-8
Benzene,
pentachloronitro-
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
Phenol,
pentachloro-
Phenacetin
62-44-2
Acetamide,
N-(4-ethoxyphenyl)
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
Phenanthrene
Phenol
108-95-2
Phenol
p-Phenylenediamine
106-50-3
1,4-Benzenediamine
Phorate
298-02-2
Phosphorodithioic
acid, O,O-diethyl S- [(ethylthio)methyl] ester
Polychlorinated
biphenyls; PCBs
Polychlorinated
biphenyls (CAS RN 1336-36-3); this category contains congener
chemicals, including constituents of Aroclor-1016 (CAS RN
12674-11-2), Aroclor-1221 (CAS RN 11104-28-2), Aroclor-1232 (CAS
RN 11141-16-5), Aroclor-1242 (CAS RN 53469-21-9), Aroclor-1248
(CAS RN 12672-29-6), Aroclor-1254 (CAS RN 11097-69-1), and
Aroclor-1260 (CAS RN 11096-82-5).
1336-36-3
See
adjacent note
1,1?-Biphenyl,
chloro derivatives
Pronamide
23950-58-5
Benzamide,
3,5-dichloro-N-(1,1-dimethyl-2-propynyl)-
Propionitrile;
Ethyl cyanide
107-12-0
Propanenitrile
Pyrene
129-00-0
Pyrene
Safrole
94-59-7
1,3-Benzodioxole,
5-(2- propenyl)-
Selenium
(Total)
Selenium
Silver
(Total)
Silver
Silvex;
2,4,5-TP
93-72-1
Propanoic
acid, 2-(2,4,5- trichlorophenoxy)-
Styrene
100-42-5
Benzene,
ethenyl-
Sulfide
18496-25-8
Sulfide
2,4,5-T;
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid
93-76-5
Acetic
acid, (2,4,5- trichlorophenoxy)-
2,3,7,8-TCDD;
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo- p-dioxin
1746-01-6
Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]dioxin,
2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
95-94-3
Benzene,
1,2,4,5-tetrachloro-
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
630-20-6
Ethane,
1,1,1,2-tetrachloro-
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
Ethane,
1,1,2,2-tetrachloro-
Tetrachloroethylene;
Tetrachloroethene; Perchloroethylene
127-18-4
Ethene,
tetrachloro-
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
Phenol,
2,3,4,6-tetrachloro-
Thallium
(Total)
Thallium
Tin
(Total)
Tin
Toluene
108-88-3
Benzene,
methyl-
o-Toluidine
95-53-4
Benzenamine,
2-methyl-
Toxaphene
This
entry includes congener chemicals contained in technical toxaphene
(CAS RN 8001-35-2), i.e., chlorinated camphene.
8001-35-2
See
adjacent note
Toxaphene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
Benzene,
1,2,4-trichloro-
1,1,1-Trichloroethane;
Methylchloroform
71-55-6
Ethane,
1,1,1-trichloro-
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
Ethane,
1,1,2-trichloro-
Trichloroethylene;
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
Ethene,
trichloro-
Trichlorofluoromethane;
CFC-11
75-69-4
Methane,
trichlorofluoro-
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
Phenol,
2,4,5-trichloro-
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
Phenol,
2,4,6-trichloro-
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
96-18-4
Propane,
1,2,3-trichloro-
O,O,O-Triethyl
phosphorothioate
126-68-1
Phosphorothioic
acid, O,O,O-triethyl ester
sym-Trinitrobenzene
99-35-4
Benzene,
1,3,5-trinitro-
Vanadium
(Total)
Vanadium
Vinyl
acetate
108-05-4
Acetic
acid, ethenyl ester
Vinyl
chloride; Chloroethene
75-01-4
Ethene,
chloro-
Xylene
(total)
Xylene
(total): This entry includes o-xylene (CAS RN 96-47-6), m-xylene
(CAS RN 108-38-3), p-xylene (CAS RN 106-42-3), and unspecified
xylenes (dimethylbenzenes) (CAS RN 1330-20-7).
96-47-6
See
adjacent note
Benzene,
dimethyl-
Zinc
(Total)
Zinc
2.3.28 Corrective Actions
Program
A. Assessment of Corrective
Measures
1. Within ninety (90) days of
finding that any of the constituents listed in § 2.3.27 of this Part
have been detected at a statistically significant level exceeding the
groundwater protection standards, the owner or operator must initiate
an assessment of corrective measures. Such an assessment must be
completed within a reasonable period of time.
2. The owner or operator must
continue to monitor in accordance with the assessment monitoring
program.
3. The assessment shall
include an analysis of the effectiveness of potential corrective
measures in meeting all of the requirements and objectives of the
remedy, addressing at least the following:
a. The performance,
reliability, ease of implementation, and potential impacts of
appropriate potential remedies, including safety impacts, cross-media
impacts, and control of exposure to any residual contamination;
b. The time required to begin
and complete the remedy;
c. The costs of remedy
implementation; and
d. The institutional
requirements such as state or local permit requirements or other
environmental or public health requirements that may substantially
affect implementation of the remedy(s).
4. The owner or operator must
discuss the results of the corrective measures assessment, prior to
the selection of remedy, in a public meeting with interested and
affected parties.
B. Selection of Remedy
1. Based on the results of the
corrective measures assessment, the owner or operator must select a
remedy that, at a minimum, meets the standards listed in §
2.3.28(B)(2) of this Part. The owner or operator must notify the
Director, within fourteen (14) days of selecting a remedy that a
report describing the selected remedy has been placed in the
operating plan and that it meets the standards in § 2.3.28(B)(2) of
this Part.
2. Remedies must:
a. Be protective of human
health and the environment;
b. Attain the groundwater
protection standard as specified pursuant to § 2.1.8 of this Part.
c. Control the source(s) of
releases so as to reduce or eliminate, to the maximum extent
practicable, further releases of § 2.3.27 of this Part into the
environment that may pose a threat to human health or the
environment; and
d. Comply with standards for
management of wastes as specified in § 2.3.28(C)(4) of this Part.
3. In selecting a remedy that
meets the standards of § 2.3.28(C)(2) of this Part, the owner or
operator shall consider the following evaluation factors:
a. The long and short-term
effectiveness and protectiveness of the potential remedy(s), along
with the degree of certainty that the remedy will prove successful
based on consideration of the following:
(1) Magnitude of reduction of
existing risks;
(2) Magnitude of residual
risks in terms of likelihood of further releases due to waste
remaining following implementation of a remedy;
(3) The type and degree of
long-term management required, including monitoring, operation, and
maintenance;
(4) Short-term risks that
might be posed to the community, workers, or the environment during
implementation of such a remedy, including potential threats to human
health and the environment associated with excavation,
transportation, and redisposal of contaminants;
(5) Time until full protection
is achieved;
(6) Potential for exposure of
humans and environmental receptors to remaining wastes, considering
the potential threat to human health and the environment associated
with excavation, transportation, redisposal, or containment;
(7) Long-term reliability of
the engineering and institutional controls; and
(8) Potential need for
replacement of the remedy.
b. The effectiveness of the
remedy in controlling the source to reduce further releases based on
consideration of the following factors:
(1) The extent to which
containment practices will reduce further releases;
(2) The extent to which
treatment technologies may be used.
c. The ease or difficulty of
implementing a potential remedy(s) based on consideration of the
following types of factors:
(1) Degree of difficulty
associated with constructing the technology;
(2) Expected operational
reliability of the technologies;
(3) Need to coordinate with
and obtain necessary approvals and permits from other agencies;
(4) Availability of necessary
equipment and specialists; and
(5) Available capacity and
location of needed treatment, storage, and disposal services.
d. Practicable capability of
the owner or operator, including a consideration of the technical and
economic capability.
e. The degree to which
community concerns are addressed by a potential remedy(s).
4. The owner or operator shall
specify as part of the selected remedy a schedule(s) for initiating
and completing remedial activities. Such a schedule must require the
initiation of remedial activities within a reasonable period of time,
taking into consideration the factors set forth in §§
2.3.28(B)(4)(a) through (h) of this Part. The owner or operator must
consider the following factors in determining the schedule of
remedial activities:
a. Extent and nature of
contamination;
b. Practical capabilities of
remedial technologies in achieving compliance with groundwater
protection standards established under § 2.1.8 of this Part and
other objectives of the remedy;
c. Availability of treatment
or disposal capacity for wastes managed during implementation of the
remedy;
d. Desirability of utilizing
technologies that are not currently available, but which may offer
significant advantages over already available technologies in terms
of effectiveness, reliability, safety, or ability to achieve remedial
objectives;
e. Potential risks to human
health and the environment from exposure to contamination prior to
completion of the remedy;
f. Resource value of the
aquifer including:
(1) Current and future uses;
(2) Proximity and withdrawal
rate of users;
(3) Groundwater quantity and
quality;
(4) The potential damage to
wildlife, crops, vegetation, and physical structures caused by
exposure to waste constituents;
(5) The hydrogeologic
characteristic of the facility and surrounding land;
(6) Groundwater removal and
treatment costs; and
(7) The cost and availability
of alternative water supplies.
g. Practicable capability of
the owner or operator.
h. Other relevant factors.
5. The Director may determine
that remediation of a release of a § 2.3.27 of this Part constituent
from a SWLF unit is not necessary if the owner or operator
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Director that:
a. The groundwater is
additionally contaminated by substances that have originated from a
source other than a SWLF unit, and those substances are present in
concentrations such that cleanup of the release from the SWLF unit
would provide no significant reduction in risk to actual or potential
receptors; or
b. The constituent(s) present
in groundwater:
(1) Is not currently or
reasonably expected to be a source of drinking water; and
(2) Is not hydraulically
connected with waters to which the hazardous constituents are
migrating or are likely to migrate in a concentration(s) that would
exceed the groundwater protection standards established under §
2.1.8 of this Part; or
c. Remediation of the
release(s) is technically impracticable; or
d. Remediation results in
unacceptable cross-media impacts.
6. A determination by the
Director pursuant to § 2.3.28(B)(5) of this Part shall not affect
the authority of the State to require the owner or operator to
undertake source control measures or other measures that may be
necessary to eliminate or minimize further releases to the
groundwater, to prevent exposure to the groundwater, or to remediate
the groundwater to concentrations that are technically practicable
and significantly reduce threats to human health or the environment.
C. Implementation of the
Corrective Action Program
1. Based on the schedule
established under § 2.3.28(B)(4) of this Part for initiation and
completion of remedial activities, the owner/operator must:
a. Establish and implement a
corrective action groundwater monitoring program that:
(1) At a minimum, meets the
requirements of an assessment monitoring program;
(2) Indicates the
effectiveness of the corrective action remedy; and
(3) Demonstrates compliance
with the ground-water protection standard pursuant to § 2.3.28(C)(5)
of this Part.
b. Implement the corrective
action remedy selected under § 2.3.28(B) of this Part; and
c. Take any interim measures
necessary to ensure the protection of human health and the
environment. Interim measures should, to the greatest practicable, be
consistent with the objectives of and contribute to the performance
of any remedy that may be required pursuant to § 2.3.28(B) of this
Part. The following factors must be considered by an owner or
operator in determining whether interim measures are necessary:
(1) Time required to develop
and implement a final remedy;
(2) Actual or potential
exposure of nearby populations or environmental receptors to
hazardous constituents;
(3) Actual or potential
contamination of drinking water supplies or sensitive ecosystems;
(4) Further degradation of the
groundwater that may occur if remedial action is not initiated
expeditiously;
(5) Weather conditions that
may cause hazardous constituents to migrate or be released;
(6) Risks of fire or
explosion, or potential for exposure to hazardous constituents as a
result of an accident or failure of a container or handling system;
and
(7) Other situations that may
pose threats to human health and the environment.
2. An owner or operator may
determine, based on information developed after implementation of the
remedy has begun or other information, that compliance with
requirements of § 2.3.28(B)(2) of this Part are not being achieved
through the remedy selected. In such cases, the owner or operator
must implement other methods or techniques that could practicably
achieve compliance with the requirements, unless the owner or
operator makes the determination under § 2.3.28(C)(3) of this Part.
3. If the owner or operator
determines that compliance with requirements under § 2.3.28(B)(2) of
this Part cannot be practically achieved with any currently available
methods, the owner or operator must:
a. Obtain certification of a
qualified groundwater scientist or approval by the Director that
compliance with requirements under § 2.3.28(B)(2) of this Part
cannot be practically achieved with any currently available methods;
b. Implement alternate
measures to control exposure of humans or the environment to residual
contamination, as necessary to protect human health and the
environment; and
c. Implement alternate
measures for control of the sources of contamination, or for removal
or decontamination of equipment, units, devices, or structures that
are:
(1) Technically practicable;
and
(2) Consistent with the
overall objective of the remedy.
d. Notify the Director within
fourteen (14) days that a report justifying the alternative measures
prior to implementing the alternative measures has been placed in the
operating plan.
4. All solid wastes that are
managed pursuant to a remedy required under § 2.3.28(B) of this
Part, or an interim measure required under § 2.3.28(C)(1)(c) of this
Part, shall be managed in a manner:
a. That is protective of human
health and the environment; and
b. That complies with
applicable RCRA requirements.
5. Remedies selected pursuant
to § 2.3.28(A) of this Part shall be considered complete when:
a. The owner or operator
complies with the groundwater protection standards established under
§ 2.1.8 of this Part at all points within the plume of contamination
that lies beyond the groundwater monitoring well system established
under § 2.1.8 of this Part.
b. Compliance with the
groundwater protection standards established under § 2.1.8 of this
Part has been achieved by demonstrating that concentrations of §
2.3.27 of this Part constituents have not exceeded the groundwater
protection standard(s) for a period of three consecutive years using
statistical procedures and performance standards.
c. The Director may specify an
alternative length of time during which the owner or operator must
demonstrate that concentrations of § 2.3.27 of this Part
constituents have not exceeded the groundwater protection standard(s)
taking into consideration:
(1) Extent and concentration
of the release(s);
(2) Behavior characteristics
of the hazardous constituents in the groundwater;
(3) Accuracy of monitoring or
modeling techniques, including any seasonal, meteorological, or other
environmental variabilities that may affect the accuracy; and
(4) Characteristics of the
groundwater.
d. All actions required to
complete the remedy have been satisfied.
6. Upon completion of the
remedy, the owner or operator must notify the Director within
fourteen (14) days that a certification that the remedy has been
completed in compliance with the requirements of § 2.3.28(A)(5) of
this Part has been placed in the operating plan. The certification
must be signed by the owner or operator and by a qualified
groundwater scientist, or approved by the Director.
7. Upon certification by the
landfill owner or operator that the remedy has been completed in
compliance with § 2.3.28(A)(5) of this Part and this certification
is also signed by a qualified groundwater scientist or approved by
the Director, then the Department shall release the landfill owner or
operator from the requirements for financial assurance for corrective
action (per § 2.3.28(D) of this Part).
D. Financial Assurance for
Corrective Action at a SWLF Unit
1. An owner or operator of a
SWLF unit required to undertake a corrective action program, must
have a detailed written estimate, in current dollars, of the cost of
hiring a third party to perform the corrective action. The corrective
action cost estimate must account for the total cost of corrective
action activities as described in the correction action remedy for
the entire corrective action period. The owner or operator must
notify the Director that this estimate has been placed in the
landfill's operating record.
2. The owner or operator must
annually adjust the corrective action cost estimate for inflation
until the corrective action program is completed.
3. The owner or operator must
increase the corrective action cost estimate and the amount of
financial assurance provided, if changes in the corrective action
program or landfill conditions increase the maximum costs of
corrective action.
4. The owner or operator may
reduce the amount of the corrective action cost estimate and the
amount of financial assurance provided, if the cost estimate exceeds
the maximum remaining costs of corrective action. The owner or
operator must notify the Director that the justification for the
reduction of the corrective action cost estimate and the amount of
financial assurance has been placed in the landfill's operating
record.
5. The landfill owner or
operator, required to undertake a corrective action program, must
establish financial assurance for the most recent corrective action
program, in accordance with § 2.3.29 of this Part. The owner or
operator must provide continuous corrective action assurance until
released from financial assurance requirements by demonstrating
compliance with and completion of corrective action remedies.
2.3.29 Allowable Mechanisms
for SWLF Units to Demonstrate Financial Assurance
A. The mechanisms to
demonstrate financial assurance must ensure that the funds necessary
to meet the costs of closure, post-closure care, and corrective
action for known releases, will be available whenever needed. SWLF
unit private and local government owners and operators must choose
from the options below and demonstrate compliance with one or more of
these allowed mechanisms by April 9, 1997:
1. Trust Fund
a. A landfill owner or
operator can establish a trust fund which conforms to the
requirements § 2.3.29(A)(1)(a) of this Part. The trustee must be an
entity which has the authority to act as a trustee and whose trust
operations are regulated and examined by a federal or state agency. A
copy of the trust agreement must be placed in the landfill's
operating record.
b. Relative to trust funds for
closure or post-closure care, payments into the trust fund must be
made annually by the landfill owner or operator over the term of the
initial license or over the remaining life of the landfill, whichever
is shorter. Relative to a trust fund for corrective action, payments
into the trust fund must be made over one - half of the estimated
length of the corrective action program. This payment period is
referred to as the pay-in period.
c. For a trust fund used to
demonstrate financial assurance for closure or post-closure care, the
first payment into the fund must be at lease equal to the current
cost estimate for closure or post-closure care except as provided in
§ 2.3.29(A)(10) of this Part, divided by the number of years in the
pay-in period. The amount of subsequent payments must be determined
by the following formula:
(1) Next Payment = (CE - CV)/Y
where:
(2) CE = Current cost estimate
for closure or post-closure care (updated for inflation or other
changes)
(3) CV = Current value of the
trust fund
(4) Y = Number of years
remaining in the pay-in period
d. For a trust fund used to
demonstrate financial assurance for corrective action, the first
payment into the fund must be at least equal to one-half of the
current cost estimate for corrective action, except as provided in §
2.3.29(A)(10) of this Part, divided by the number of years in the
corrective action pay-in period. The amount of subsequent payments
must be determined by the following formula:
(1) Next Payment = (RB - CV)/Y
where:
(2) RB = most recent estimate
of the required trust fund balance for corrective action (i.e. the
total costs that will be incurred during the second half of the
corrective action period) and CV, Y are defined above.
e. Relative to trust funds for
closure or post-closure care, the initial payment into the fund must
be made before the initial receipt of waste or by April 9, 1994,
whichever is later. Relative to a trust fund for corrective action,
the initial payment must be made no later than 120 days after
selection of the corrective action remedy.
f. If the landfill owner or
operator establishes a trust fund after using one or more alternate
allowable mechanisms to demonstrate financial assurance, then the
initial payment into the trust fund must be at least the amount the
fund would contain if the trust fund had been established initially
and annual payments made according to §§ 2.3.29(A)(1)(c) and (d) of
this Part.
g. The landfill owner or
operator, or other person, business, or organization authorized to
conduct closure, post-closure care, or corrective action activities
may request reimbursement from the trustee for these expenditures.
Requests for reimbursement will be granted by the trustee only if
sufficient funds remain in the trust fund to cover the remaining
costs of closure, post-closure care, or corrective action and if
justification and documentation of the cost is placed in the
landfill's operating record. The owner or operator must notify the
Director that documentation of the justification for reimbursement
has been placed in the operating record and that reimbursement has
been received.
h. The trust fund may be
terminated by the landfill owner or operator only if he substitutes
alternate acceptable financial assurance or if he is no longer
required to demonstrate financial assurance.
2. Surety Bond Guaranteeing
Payment or Performance
a. A landfill owner or
operator may demonstrate financial assurance for closure or
post-closure care by obtaining a payment or performance surety bond.
An owner or operator may demonstrate financial assurance for
corrective action by obtaining a performance bond. The bond must be
effective before the initial receipt of waste or by April 9, 1994,
whichever is later, relative to closure or post-closure care, or not
later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy has been
selected. The owner or operator must notify the Director that a copy
of the bond has been placed in the landfill's operating record. The
surety company issuing the bond must, at a minimum, be among those
listed as acceptable sureties on Federal bonds in Circular 570 of the
U.S. Department of Treasury.
b. The penal sum of the bond
must be in an amount at least equal to the current cost estimate for
closure, post-closure or corrective action, whichever is applicable,
except as provided in § 2.3.29(A)(11) of this Part.
c. Under terms of the bond,
the surety will become liable on the bond obligation when the owner
or operator fails to perform as guaranteed by the bond.
d. The owner or operator must
establish a standby trust fund, which meets the requirements of §
2.3.29(A)(1) of this Part, except the requirements for initial
payment and subsequent annual payments in §§ 2.3.29(A)(1)(b)
through (e) of this Part.
e. Payments made under terms
of the bond will be deposited by the surety directly into the standby
trust fund. Payments from the trust fund must be approved by the
trustee.
f. Under terms of the bond,
the surety may cancel the bond by sending notice of cancellation by
certified mail to the landfill owner and operator and to the Director
at least 120 days in advance of cancellation. If the surety cancels
the bond, the landfill owner or operator must obtain alternate
acceptable financial assurance.
g. The landfill owner or
operator may cancel the bond only if alternate acceptable financial
assurance is substituted or if the owner or operator is no longer
required to demonstrate financial assurance.
3. Letter of Credit
a. A landfill owner or
operator may obtain an irrevocable standby letter of credit. It must
be effective before the initial receipt of waste or by April 9, 1994,
whichever is later, relative to closure or post-closure care, or no
later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy has been
selected. The owner or operator must notify the Director that a copy
of the letter of credit has been placed in the landfill's operating
record. The issuing institution must be an entity which has the
authority to issue letters of credit and whose letter-of-credit
operations are regulated and examined by a federal or state agency.
b. A letter from the owner or
operator referring to the letter of credit by number, issuing
institution, and date and providing the name and address of the
facility and amount of funds assured, must be included with the
letter of credit in the landfill operating record.
c. The letter of credit must
be irrevocable and issued for a period of at least one year in an
amount at least equal to the current cost estimate for closure,
post-closure, or corrective action, whichever is applicable, except
as provided in § 2.3.29(A)(1) of this Part. The letter of credit
must provide for an automatic extension of the expiration date for at
least one year, unless the issuing institution has canceled the
letter of credit by sending a notice of cancellation by certified
mail to the landfill owner and operator and to the Director at least
120 days in advance of cancellation. If the letter of credit is
canceled by the issuing institution, the landfill owner or operator
must obtain alternate acceptable financial assurance.
d. The landfill owner or
operator may cancel the letter of credit only if alternate acceptable
financial assurance is substituted or if the owner or operator is no
longer required to demonstrate financial assurance.
4. Insurance
a. The landfill owner or
operator may demonstrate financial assurance for closure and
post-closure care by obtaining insurance which is effective before
the initial receipt of waste or by April 9, 1994, whichever is later.
At a minimum, the insurer must be licensed to transact the business
of insurance or must be eligible to provide insurance as an excess or
surplus lines insurer, in one or more states. The owner or operator
must notify the Director that a copy of the insurance policy has been
placed in the landfill operating record.
b. The closure or post-closure
care insurance policy must guarantee that funds will be available to
close the landfill whenever final closure occurs or to provide
post-closure care for the landfill whenever the post-closure care
period begins, whichever applies. The policy must also guarantee that
once closure or post-closure care begins, the insurer will be
responsible for the paying out of funds to the landfill owner or
operator or other person, organization or business authorized to
conduct closure or post-closure care, up to an amount equal to the
face amount of the policy.
c. The insurance policy must
be issued for a face amount at lease equal to the current cost
estimate for closure or post-closure care, whichever is applicable,
except as provided in § 2.3.29(A)(1) of this Part. The term, "face
amount" means the total amount the insurer is obligated to pay
under the policy. Actual payments by the insurer will not change the
face amount, although the insurer's future liability will be lowered
by the amount of payments.
d. The landfill owner or
operator or other person authorized to conduct closure or
post-closure care, may receive reimbursements for closure or
post-closure expenditures, whichever applies. Requests for
reimbursement will be granted by the insurer only if the remaining
value of the policy is sufficient to cover the remaining costs of
closure or post-closure care, and if justification and documentation
of the cost is placed in the landfill's operating record. The owner
or operator must notify the Director that the documentation of the
justification for reimbursement has been placed in the landfill's
operating record and that reimbursement has been received.
e. Each insurance policy must
contain a provision allowing assignment of the policy to a successor
landfill owner or operator. Such assignment may be conditional upon
consent of the insurer, provided that such content is not
unreasonable refused.
f. The insurance policy must
provide that the insurer will not cancel, terminate, or fail to renew
the policy except for failure to pay the premium. The automatic
renewal of the policy must, at minimum, provide the insured with the
option of renewal at the face amount of the expiring policy. If there
is a failure to pay the premium, then the insurer may cancel the
policy by sending notice of cancellation by certified mail to the
landfill owner and operator and to the Director at least 120 days in
advance of cancellation. If the insurer cancels the policy, then the
landfill owner or operator must obtain alternate acceptable financial
assurance.
g. For insurance policies
providing coverage for post-closure care, commencing on the date that
liability to make payments pursuant to the policy accrues, the
insurer will thereafter annually increase the face amount of the
policy. Such increase must be equivalent to the face amount of the
policy, less any payments made, multiplied by an amount equivalent to
85 percent of the most recent investment rate or of the equivalent
coupon issue yield announced by the U.S. Dept. of the Treasury for
26-week treasury securities.
h. The landfill owner or
operator may cancel the insurance policy only if alternate acceptable
financial assurance is substituted or if the owner or operator is no
longer required to demonstrate financial assurance.
5. Local Government Financial
Test - A local government owner or operator that satisfies the
requirements of §§ 2.3.29(A)(6)(a) through (c) of this Part may
demonstrate financial assurance up to the amount specified in §
2.3.29(A)(6)(d) of this Part.
a. Financial Component
(1) The owner or operator must
satisfy either §§ 2.3.29(A)(6)(a)((1)) or ((2)) of this Part.
(AA) If the owner or operator
has outstanding general obligation bonds, it must have a current
Moody's rating of Aaa, Aa, A, or Baa or a current Standard and Poor's
rating of AAA, AA, A, or BBB, on all outstanding general obligation
bonds.
(BB) If the owner does not
have outstanding general obligation bonds, it must satisfy each of
the following financial ratios: A ratio of cash plus marketable
securities to total expenditures greater than or equal to 0.05; and A
ratio of annual debt service to total expenditures less than an equal
to 0.20; and A ratio of long-term debt issued and outstanding to
capital expenditures less than or equal to 2.00.
(2) The owner or operator must
prepare its financial statements in conformity with General Accepted
Accounting Principles for governments.
(3) An owner or operator is
not eligible to assure its obligations under this § 2.3.29(A)(6) of
this Part if any of the following apply to the owner or operator: Is
currently in default on any outstanding general obligation bonds; or
Has one or more outstanding general obligation bonds with a Moody's
rating lower than Baa or with a Standard and Poor's rating lower than
BBB; or Operated at a deficit equal to five percent or more of total
annual revenue in either of the past two fiscal years; or Receives an
adverse opinion, disclaimer of opinion, or other qualified opinion
from the independent certified public accountant (or appropriate
state agency) auditing its financial statement as required under §
2.3.29(F)(1)(b) of this Part. However, the Director may evaluate
qualified opinions on a case-by-case basis and allow use of the
financial test in cases where the Director deems the qualification
insufficient to warrant disallowance of the test.
b. Public Notice Component -
The local government owner or operator must place a reference to the
closure, post-closure care, or corrective action costs assured
through the financial test into its most recent comprehensive annual
financial report or budget. Relative to closure and post-closure
care, this reference must be included by April 9, 1997 or prior to
the initial receipt of waste at the facility, whichever is later.
Relative to corrective action, this reference must be included not
later than 120 days after an acceptable corrective action remedy has
been selected. The reference must include the amount of each cost
estimate and the year(s) in which the local government expects these
costs to be incurred. References in the budget must occur as budgeted
line items if the activities are to occur in the period covered by
the budget, but may appear in a supplemental data section if the
activities will not occur until after the period covered by the
budget.
c. Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements
(1) The local government owner
or operator must place the following items in the facility's
operating record:
(AA) A letter signed by the
local government's Chief Financial Officer that: Lists all the
current cost estimates covered by a financial test, as described in §
2.3.29(A)(6)(b) of this Part; provides evidence and certifies that
the local government meets the conditions of either §§
2.3.29(A)(6)(a)((1)) or ((2)) of this Part, and Certifies that the
local government meets the conditions of § 2.3.29(A)(6)(d) of this
Part.
(BB) The local government's
independently audited year-end financial statements for the latest
fiscal year, including the unqualified opinion of the auditor who
must be an independent, certified public accountant or an appropriate
state agency that conducts equivalent comprehensive audits; and
(CC) A report to the local
government from the local government's independent certified public
accountant or the appropriate state agency stating that:
(i) The certified public
accountant or state agency has compared the data in the chief
financial officer's independently audited, year-end financial
statements for the latest fiscal year, and
(ii) In connection with that
examination, no matters came to his attention which caused him to
believe that the data in the chief financial officer's letter should
be adjusted.
(2) The items required §
2.3.29(F)(3)(a) of this Part must be placed in the facility operating
record as follows:
(AA) Relative to closure and
post-closure care, before April 9, 1997 or prior to the initial
receipt of waste at the facility, whichever is later; or
(BB) Relative to corrective
action, not later than 120 days after an acceptable corrective action
remedy is selected.
(3) After placement of §
2.3.29(F)(3)(a) of this Part items in the facility's operating
record, the local government owner or operator must at least annually
update this information and place the updated information in the
facility's operating record within ninety (90) days following the end
of the owner or operator's fiscal year.
(4) The local government owner
or operator is no longer required to meet the requirements of §
2.3.29(F)(3)(e) of this Part when either:
(AA) The owner or operator
substitutes alternate financial assurance as specified in §
2.3.29(F)(3)(e) of this Part; or
(BB) The owner or operator is
released from the requirements of this section in accordance with §§
2.1.9 and 2.3.28 of this Part.
(5) A local government must
satisfy the requirements of the financial test at the close of each
fiscal year. If the local government owner or operator no longer
meets the requirements of the local government financial test, it
must, within 120 days following the end of the owner or operator's
fiscal year, obtain alternative financial assurance that meets the
requirements of this section, place the required submissions for
assurance in the facility operating record, and notify the Director
that the owner or operator no longer meets the criteria of the
financial test and that alternate financial assurance has been
obtained.
(6) The Director, based on a
reasonable belief that the local government owner or operator no
longer meets the requirements of the local government financial test,
may at any time require additional reports of financial condition
from the local government. If the Director finds, on the basis of
such reports or other information, that the owner or operator no
longer meets the requirements of the local government financial test,
then the local government must provide alternate financial assurance
in accordance with § 2.3.29(A)(6)(c)((5)) of this Part.
d. Calculation of Costs to be
Assured -The portion of the closure, post-closure, and corrective
action costs for which an owner or operator can assure under §
2.3.29(F)(4) of this Part is determined as follows:
(1) If the local government
owner or operator does not assure other environmental obligations
through a financial test, it may assure closure, post-closure, and
corrective action costs that equal up to 43 percent of the local
government's total annual revenue.
(2) If the local government
assures other environmental obligations through a financial test,
including those associated with UIC facilities under 40 C.F.R. §
144.62 (2017), incorporated in § 1.3(A) of this Subchapter,
petroleum underground storage tank facilities under 40 C.F.R. § 280
(2017), incorporated in § 1.3(A) of this Subchapter, PCB storage
facilities under 40 C.F.R. § 761 (2017), incorporated in § 1.3(A)
of this Subchapter, and hazardous waste treatment, storage, and
disposal facilities under 40 C.F.R. §§ 264 and 265 (2017),
incorporated in § 1.3(A) of this Subchapter, it must add those costs
to the closure, post-closure and corrective action costs it seeks to
assure under § 2.3.29(A)(6)(d) of this Part. The total must not
exceed 43 percent of the local government's total annual revenue.
(3) The owner or operator must
obtain an alternate financial assurance instrument for those costs
that exceed the limits set in §§ 2.3.29(A)(6)(d)((1)) and ((2)) of
this Part.
6. Local Government Guarantee
- An owner or operator may demonstrate financial assurance for
closure, post-closure, and corrective action, as required by §§
2.1.9 and 2.3.28 of this Part, by obtaining a written guarantee
provided by a local government. The guarantor must meet the
requirements of the local government financial test in §
2.3.29(A)(6) of this Part, and must comply with the terms of a
written guarantee.
a. Terms of the Written
Guarantee - Relative to closure and post-closure care, the guarantee
must be effective before April 9, 1997 or before the initial receipt
of waste, whichever is later. Relative to corrective action, the
guarantee must be no later than 120 days after an acceptable
corrective action remedy has been selected. The guarantee must
provide that:
(1) If the owner or operator
fails to perform closure, post-closure care, and/or corrective action
of a facility covered by the guarantee, the guarantor will either:
Perform, or pay a third party to perform, closure, post-closure care,
and/or corrective action as required; or Establish a fully funded
trust fund, as specified in § 2.3.29(A)(1) of this Part, in the name
of the owner or operator.
(2) The guarantee will remain
in force unless the guarantor sends notice of cancellation by
certified mail to the owner or operator and to the Director.
Cancellation may not occur, however, during the 120 days beginning on
the date of receipt of the notice of cancellation by both the owner
or operator and the Director, as evidenced by the return receipts.
(3) If a guarantee is
canceled, the owner or operator must, within 90 days following
receipt of the cancellation notice by the owner or operator and the
Director, obtain alternate financial assurance, place evidence of
that alternate financial assurance in the facility operating record,
and notify the Director. If the owner or operator fails to provide
alternate financial assurance within the 90 day period, the guarantor
must provide that alternate assurance within 120 days following the
close of the guarantor's fiscal year, obtain alternative assurance,
place evidence of the alternate assurance in the facility operating
record, and notify the Director.
b. Recordkeeping and Reporting
(1) Relative to closure and
post-closure care, the owner or operator must place a certified copy
of the guarantee, along with the items required within §
2.3.29(A)(6)(c) of this Part, into the facility's operating record
before April 9, 1997 or before the initial receipt of waste,
whichever is later. Relative to corrective action, this certified
copy and items must be placed into the facility's operating record no
later than 120 days after an acceptable corrective action remedy has
been selected.
(2) The owner or operator is
no longer required to maintain the items specified in §
2.3.29(A)(8)(a) of this Part of this section when either: The owner
or operator substitutes alternate financial assurance as specified in
this section; or The owner or operator is released from the
requirements of this section in accordance with §§ 2.1.9 and 2.3.28
of this Part.
(3) If a local government
guarantor no longer meets the requirements of § 2.3.29(A)(6)(a) of
this Part, the owner or operator must, within 90 days following the
end of the guarantor's fiscal year, obtain alternative assurance,
place evidence of the alternate assurance in the facility's operating
record, and notify the Director. If the owner or operator fails to
provide alternate financial assurance within the 90-day period, the
guarantor must provide that alternate assurance within 120 days.
7. State-Approved Mechanism -
An owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of this section by
obtaining any other mechanism that meets the criteria specified in §
2.3.29 of this Part and that is approved by the Director.
8. State Assumption of
Responsibility - If the Director either assumes legal responsibility
for an owner or operator's compliance with closure, post-closure care
and/or corrective action requirements or assures that funds will be
available from State sources to cover these requirements, then the
owner or operator will be in compliance with the requirements of this
section. Any assumption of this responsibility, by the Director, must
meet the criteria specified in § 2.3.29 of this Part. The owner or
operator will not be relieved of this responsibility, except if the
Director assumes the responsibility and declares such responsibility,
in writing, to the owner or operator or their representative or
successor.
9. Use of Multiple Mechanisms
- An owner or operator may demonstrate financial assurance for
closure, post-closure, and corrective action, as required by §§
2.1.9 and 2.3.28 of this Part, by establishing more than one
financial mechanism per facility, except that mechanisms guaranteeing
performance, rather than payment, may not be combined with other
instruments. The mechanisms must be as specified in §§ 2.3.29(A)(1)
through (8) of this Part, except that financial assurance for an
amount at least equal to the current cost estimate for closure,
post-closure care, and/or corrective action may be provided by a
combination of mechanism, rather than a single mechanism.
10. Other Requirements of the
Financial Mechanisms
a. The financial assurance
mechanisms must ensure that the amount of funds assured is sufficient
to cover the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective
action for known releases when needed and will be available in a
timely fashion when needed.
b. The financial assurance
mechanisms must be obtained by the owner or operator by the effective
date of these requirements or prior to the initial receipt of solid
waste, whichever is later, in the case of closure and post-closure
care, and no later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy
has been properly selected, until the Director releases the owner or
operator from financial assurance requirements, per §§ 2.1.9 and
2.3.28 of this Part.
c. The financial assurance
mechanisms must be legally valid, binding, and enforceable under
state and federal law.