S.D. Codified Laws § 32-37-4

Violation not considered negligence or assumption of risk--Evidence inadmissible

Last amended: 1984Year: 2025Length: 42 wordsOfficial source
Failure to comply with the provisions of this chapter is not considered as contributory negligence, comparative negligence, or assumption of the risk and is not admissible as evidence in the trial of any civil action. Source: SL 1984, ch 235, § 4.
S.D. Codified Laws § 32-37-4: Violation not considered negligence or assumption of risk--Evidence inadmissible | Justis AI