No. 00-159
Lucrative Offices; Article II, Section 26
Cite as Op. Tenn. Att'y Gen. No. 00-159
It is not unconstitutional under Article II, Section 26 of the Tennessee Constitution for a county
Article II, Section 26, of the Tennessee Constitution, in pertinent part, prohibits any person in this
State from holding more than one lucrative office at the same time. As used in that section, the term "office"
has been construed by Tennessee courts to mean a "state office." Phillips v. West, 187 Tenn. 57, 213
S.W.2d 3 (1948); Boswell v. Powell, 163 Tenn. 445, 43 S.W.2d 495 (1931).
It is clear that the office of county commissioner is a local office, not a state office, for purposes of
Article II, Section 26. See Op. Tenn. Atty. 98-213 (November 23, 1998). Therefore, a county
commissioner may hold either another local office or a state office without violating Article II, Section 26.
We caution, however, that holding two such offices might be prohibited by legislation. See, e.g.,
Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. 99-044 (March 1, 1999) (an individual was prohibited from serving on the Lake
County Board of Highway Commissioners and the Lake County Commission by the private act that
created the Board) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 5-5-102(c)(2) and (3) (statutory prohibitions against county
commissioners holding certain other offices). Moreover, as addressed in a number of previous opinions
issued by this Office, there is a well-recognized common law prohibition against a public officer holding two
incompatible offices at the same time; the question of incompatibility depends upon the facts and
S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E
OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL
500 CHARLOTTE AVENUE
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-0497
October 17, 2000
Opinion No. 00-159
Lucrative Offices; Article II, Section 26
QUESTION
Is it unconstitutional under Article II, Section 26 of the Tennessee Constitution for a county
commissioner to also serve on the Road Board and receive money from both elected positions?
OPINION
It is not unconstitutional under Article II, Section 26 of the Tennessee Constitution for a county
commissioner to also serve on the Road Board and receive money from both elected positions.
ANALYSIS
Article II, Section 26, of the Tennessee Constitution, in pertinent part, prohibits any person in this
State from holding more than one lucrative office at the same time. As used in that section, the term “office”
has been construed by Tennessee courts to mean a “state office.” Phillips v. West, 187 Tenn. 57, 213
S.W.2d 3 (1948); Boswell v. Powell, 163 Tenn. 445, 43 S.W.2d 495 (1931).
It is clear that the office of county commissioner is a local office, not a state office, for purposes of
Article II, Section 26. See Op. Tenn. Atty. 98-213 (November 23, 1998). Therefore, a county
commissioner may hold either another local office or a state office without violating Article II, Section 26.
We caution, however, that holding two such offices might be prohibited by legislation. See, e.g.,
Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. 99-044 (March 1, 1999) (an individual was prohibited from serving on the Lake
County Board of Highway Commissioners and the Lake County Commission by the private act that
created the Board) and Tenn. Code Ann. § 5-5-102(c)(2) and (3) (statutory prohibitions against county
commissioners holding certain other offices). Moreover, as addressed in a number of previous opinions
issued by this Office, there is a well-recognized common law prohibition against a public officer holding two
incompatible offices at the same time; the question of incompatibility depends upon the facts and
Page 2
circumstances of the particular situation. See Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. 99-195 (September 28, 1999) and the
opinions cited therein.
Thus, it is the opinion of this Office that Article II, Section 26, of the Tennessee Constitution does
not itself prohibit a county commissioner from serving on the Road Board and receiving money from both
elected positions. However, an individual’s having two such offices may be prohibited by legislation or,
under certain facts and circumstances, the common law prohibition against holding incompatible offices.
PAUL G. SUMMERS
Attorney General and Reporter
MICHAEL E. MOORE
Solicitor General
H. PHILLIP CARNES
Senior Counsel
Requested by:
The Honorable John Hood
State Representative
110 War Memorial Building
Nashville, Tennessee 37243-0148
circumstances of the particular situation. See Op. Tenn. Atty. Gen. 99-195 (September 28, 1999) and the
Thus, it is the opinion of this Office that Article II, Section 26, of the Tennessee Constitution does
not itself prohibit a county commissioner from serving on the Road Board and receiving money from both
elected positions. However, an individual's having two such offices may be prohibited by legislation or,