No. 00-163
Humane Society Lien on Animals Lawfully In Custody
Cite as Op. Tenn. Att'y Gen. No. 00-163
S T A T E O F T E N N E S S E E
OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL
425 FIFTH AVENUE NORTH
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243
October 19, 2000
Opinion No. 00-163
Humane Society Lien on Animals Lawfully In Custody
QUESTIONS
1.
Does Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(e) grant to a humane society a lien on any animal
lawfully in its custody, and what is lawful custody under the statute?
2.
Is the lien granted by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(e) curtailed by Tenn. Code Ann. §§
39-14-202(c) and 39-14-207(b)?
3.
May a humane society solicit a donation in lieu of payment of the liens authorized by Tenn.
Code Ann. §§ 39-14-202(c), 39-14-207(b) and 39-14-210(e)?
OPINIONS
1.
The statute grants to a humane society a lien on an animal lawfully in its custody, while
separate statutory sections specify the circumstances, primarily involving neglect or abuse of an animal, in
which an animal lawfully comes into custody.
2.
No. The latter statutes supplement or provide an alternate remedy to the lien granted by
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(e).
3.
Yes. As the lienor, a humane society may release a lien on any terms that it considers
satisfactory.
ANALYSIS
1.
The plain language of Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(e) grants to a humane society
chartered by the state a lien on any animal that comes lawfully into its custody for the value of goods and
services that the society reasonably provides to the animal. The section provides:
Lbl
Lbl
Lbl
Lbl
Lbl
Lbl
chartered by the state a lien on any animal that comes lawfully into its custody for the value of goods and
Page 2
Any humane society chartered by the state, into whose custody
shall lawfully come any animal, shall have a lien on that animal for the
reasonable value of the goods and services necessarily rendered by, or at
the instance of, the society to that animal.
Id.
An animal may lawfully come into the custody of a humane society under several circumstances.
One statutory section indicates that a humane society may take custody of any injured, diseased,
malnourished or exposed animal found at large, providing in full:
In case any animal is injured, diseased, suffering from the
elements, or malnourished, and is found at large by any agent of any
humane society chartered by the state, the agent may cause adequate
veterinary treatment or shelter or nourishment to be furnished to the
animal. The society shall have a right of action against the owner of the
animal for all necessary and reasonable expenses so incurred. Within
forty-eight (48) hours after taking custody of the animal, the society shall
make reasonable efforts to notify the owner of the animal's whereabouts
and condition. Nothing in this subsection shall affect the right of action of
the veterinarian or furnisher of goods or services against the person or
persons with whom such veterinarian or furnisher of goods or services
contracted for payment of charges. Any such right of action by a humane
society may be voided by an owner who elects to forfeit the animal to the
society rather than pay for the goods or services rendered.
Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-207(b). A separate section provides that “custody of any animal victimized
under this part shall be placed with any humane society chartered by the state immediately upon arrest of
the person alleged to have violated this part.” Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14- 210(f). Finally, a person
convicted of cruelty to an animal must forfeit the animal and surrender custody of the animal to a humane
society. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-202(d). It appears that an animal may come into custody under the
circumstances set out in any of the three sections just cited.
2.
Neither Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 39-14-202(c) nor 39-14-207(b) curtail the lien granted to
a humane society pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(e). Pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-
202(c), when a person is taken into custody by an officer for transporting or confining an animal in a cruel
manner, the officer may take charge of the vehicle used to transport the animal and its “contents,” and
deposit these items in a “safe place” for custody. Any necessary expense incurred in taking and
safeguarding the items is a lien to be paid before the items can lawfully be recovered, and any remaining
unpaid expenses may be recovered by the person incurring the expenses from the owner of the animal in
an action therefor. Id.
Lbl
Lbl
Lbl
It is unclear whether the term "contents" in the lien just described includes the animal being
transported, but it makes no difference to the analysis. If the term "contents" does not include the animal,
the lien on the animal granted by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(e) is obviously unaffected. If the term
"contents" includes the animal being transported, the lien provided by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-202(c)
appears to be similar to the lien provided by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(e), with added language that
the lienholder may recover any remaining unpaid expenses in an action therefor. Thus, if a humane society
is the "safe place" in which an animal is deposited as "contents" pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-
202(c), the humane society has a lien on the animal under both that section and Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-
Similarly, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-207(b), which is set forth in full above, operates not to curtail
the lien provided by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(e), but to supplement it. Pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann.
§ 39-14-207(b), an agent of a humane society may secure veterinary treatment, shelter or nourishment for
any suffering animal that the agent finds at large. The humane society has a right of action against the owner
of the animal for all necessary and reasonable expenses so incurred. Id. The right of action may be voided
if the animal's owner elects to forfeit the animal rather than pay the expenses. Id. The right of action set
out in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-207(b) does not curtail the lien granted by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-
210(e) but simply provides a humane society with an alternate method to recover the expenses that it incurs
3. A lien "is a legal claim or charge on real or personal property used as security for the
payment of some debt or obligation." Keep Fresh Air Filters, Inc. v. Reguli, 888 S.W.2d 437, 443
(Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). Obviously, payment of the debt satisfies a lien. See, e.g., Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-
21-101 (providing that a lien may only be enforced "on affidavit that the debt is due and unpaid"). We can
find no authority that would prevent a humane society, as a lienor, from releasing its lien and considering
Page 3
It is unclear whether the term “contents” in the lien just described includes the animal being
transported, but it makes no difference to the analysis. If the term “contents” does not include the animal,
the lien on the animal granted by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(e) is obviously unaffected. If the term
“contents” includes the animal being transported, the lien provided by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-202(c)
appears to be similar to the lien provided by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(e), with added language that
the lienholder may recover any remaining unpaid expenses in an action therefor. Thus, if a humane society
is the “safe place” in which an animal is deposited as “contents” pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-
202(c), the humane society has a lien on the animal under both that section and Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-
210(e) for expenses that the humane society incurs.
Similarly, Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-207(b), which is set forth in full above, operates not to curtail
the lien provided by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-210(e), but to supplement it. Pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann.
§ 39-14-207(b), an agent of a humane society may secure veterinary treatment, shelter or nourishment for
any suffering animal that the agent finds at large. The humane society has a right of action against the owner
of the animal for all necessary and reasonable expenses so incurred. Id. The right of action may be voided
if the animal’s owner elects to forfeit the animal rather than pay the expenses. Id. The right of action set
out in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-207(b) does not curtail the lien granted by Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-
210(e) but simply provides a humane society with an alternate method to recover the expenses that it incurs
in caring for an animal.
3.
A lien “is a legal claim or charge on real or personal property used as security for the
payment of some debt or obligation.” Keep Fresh Air Filters, Inc. v. Reguli, 888 S.W.2d 437, 443
(Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). Obviously, payment of the debt satisfies a lien. See, e.g., Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-
21-101(providing that a lien may only be enforced “on affidavit that the debt is due and unpaid”). We can
find no authority that would prevent a humane society, as a lienor, from releasing its lien and considering
its debt satisfied on whatever terms it chooses, including a donation from the lienee.
PAUL G. SUMMERS
Attorney General and Reporter
MICHAEL E. MOORE
Solicitor General
DOUGLAS EARL DIMOND
Assistant Attorney General
Page 4
Requested by:
Honorable Andy Womack
State Senator
16 Senatorial District
th
Suite 9-A, Legislative Plaza
Nashville, TN 37243-0216
16th Senatorial District