0520-02-01-.18
Local Level Grievances
Cite as Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0520-02-01-.18
(1)
T.C.A. § 49-1-302 provides for a local-level evaluation grievance procedure, which shall
provide a means for evaluated teachers and school administrators to challenge only the
accuracy of the data used in the evaluation and the adherence to the evaluation rules and
policies adopted by the State Board.
(2)
All local-level grievance procedures shall be aligned with the requirements of this rule, State
Board Policy 5.201, and the Local-Level Grievance Protocol published by the Department.
The local-level grievance procedure shall provide for a review of the data used for the
calculation of an evaluation score to ensure it is properly attributed to the educator.
(3)
The director of schools or charter school leader shall ensure all educators are aware of the
local-level grievance procedures and shall ensure the grievance process is conducted
without fear, discrimination, or reprisal.
(4)
Each local-level grievance procedure shall provide educators an opportunity to request for a
review of the accuracy of the data, including the following:
(a)
The calculation of the qualitative score to ensure the correct procedures were followed;
and
(b)
Student scores used as part of the quantitative portion to ensure they were correctly
assigned to the educator.
(5)
All grievances shall be filed with the educator’s LEA or charter school governing body. If the
grievance decision does not require a change to the educator’s evaluation score, the
grievance shall be resolved by the LEA or charter school governing body. If a grievance
decision by an LEA or charter school governing body would require a change to an
educator’s evaluation score, the grievance resolution shall be submitted to the Department
for final approval and action.
(6)
Minor procedural errors in implementing the evaluation model shall be resolved by the LEA or
charter school governing body procedure but shall not constitute grounds for challenging the
final results of an evaluation. Minor procedural errors shall be defined as errors that do not
materially affect or compromise the integrity of the evaluation results. The final results of an
evaluation may only be challenged if the person being evaluated can demonstrate, no later
than during step II of the grievance procedure, that the procedural errors made could
materially affect or compromise the integrity of the evaluation results. The Department shall
provide guidance on which procedural errors may materially affect or compromise the results
of the evaluation.
(7)
Grievances may be filed at the end of each of the three (3) components of the evaluation
model: qualitative appraisal; student growth measures; and other measures of student
achievement.
(8)
A grievance shall be filed no later than fifteen (15) days from the date educators receive the
results for each component; otherwise the grievance shall be considered untimely and
invalid. Nothing shall preclude educators from filing a grievance at any time prior to the
deadlines stated herein.
EVALUATIONS
CHAPTER 0520-02-01
(9)
LEAs and charter schools shall develop and make available standard grievance forms. No
grievance may be denied because the standard form adopted by the educator’s LEA or
charter school has not been used, as long as the components required by this rule are
included.
(10) Each grievance submitted shall contain:
(a)
The educator’s name, position, school, and additional title, if any;
(b)
The name of the educator’s immediate supervisor;
(c)
The name of the evaluator/reviewer;
(d)
The date the challenged evaluation was received;
(e)
The evaluation period in question;
(f)
The basis for the grievance, which must include an allegation of inaccurate data used
in the evaluation or a failure to follow correct evaluation procedures under this rule and
State Board Policy 5.201. A failure to state the basis for the grievance shall result in the
grievance being considered invalid;
(g)
The corrective action desired by the educator; and
(h)
Sufficient facts or other information to begin an investigation.
(11) Procedures. The grievance process shall be conducted in accordance with the following three
(3) steps:
(a)
Step I – Evaluator. Educator submits their grievance to the evaluator.
1.
Written grievance containing the information required under paragraph ten (10) is
submitted to the evaluator within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the result of the
component being grieved.
2.
Local administrative investigation and fact finding. Evaluator submits decision to
LEA administrator or charter school leader for review and confirmation of final
decision.
3.
Decision clearly communicated in writing to educator within fifteen (15) days of
receipt of the grievance. If a grievance is resolved at Step I and requires a
change to an educator’s evaluation score, the grievance resolution shall be
submitted to the Department for final approval and action.
4.
To allow disputes to be resolved at the lowest level possible, the evaluator may
take necessary action, based on the circumstances, to correct any procedural
errors made in the evaluation process.
(b)
Step II – Director of Schools or Charter School Leader. If a grievance is not resolved to
the satisfaction of the educator at Step I, the Step I decision may be appealed to the
director of schools or charter school leader or their designee who shall have had no
input or involvement in the evaluation for which the grievance has been filed.
1.
Written grievance and prior step decision submitted by the educator to the
director of schools or charter school leader or their designee within fifteen (15)
EVALUATIONS
CHAPTER 0520-02-01
days of receipt of decision from Step I. The designee cannot be used in cases
involving a school administrator’s evaluation.
2.
Informal discussion or hearing of facts, allegations, and testimony by appropriate
witnesses as soon as practical. An attorney or a representative of an educator
may speak on behalf of the educator during the informal discussion or hearing
but is not required.
3.
Local investigation, fact finding, and written final decision communicated to the
educator in writing within fifteen (15) days of discussion.
4.
If a grievance is resolved at Step II and requires a change to an educator’s
evaluation score, the grievance resolution shall be submitted to the Department
for final approval and action.
5.
To allow disputes to be resolved at the lowest level possible, the Director of
Schools or charter school leader may take necessary action, based on the
circumstances, to immediately correct any procedural errors made in the
evaluation process.
(c)
Step III – Local Board of Education or Charter School Governing Body. If a grievance is
not resolved to the satisfaction of the educator at Step II, the Step II decision may be
appealed by the educator to the local board of education or charter school governing
body.
1.
To appeal the Step II decision to the local board of education or charter school
governing body educators must submit a written grievance and all relevant
documentation to the local board of education or charter school governing body
within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the decision from Step II. Educators may
include with the grievance a request for a full hearing before the local board of
education or charter school governing body as part of the written grievance.
2.
The board of education or charter school governing body, may grant a request
for a full hearing or if the board of education or charter school governing body
denies a request for a full hearing, the local board or charter school governing
body may affirm or overturn the decision of the director of schools or charter
school leader without a hearing by basing the decision upon the record from the
previous grievance steps. Any hearing granted by the board of education or
charter school governing body shall be held no later than thirty (30) days after
receipt of a Step III appeal and request for a hearing.
3.
The local board of education or charter school governing body shall give written
notice of the time and place of any hearing to the educator, director of schools or
charter school leader, and all administrators involved.
4.
If a grievance is resolved at Step III and requires a change to an educator’s
evaluation score, the grievance shall be submitted to the Department for final
approval and action.
5.
The decision of the local board of education or charter governing body shall be
communicated in writing to all parties, no later than thirty (30) days after
conclusion of the hearing.
6.
The local board of education or charter school governing body shall serve as the
final step for all local level grievances to resolve issues with the qualitative
portions of the evaluation process.
EVALUATIONS
CHAPTER 0520-02-01
7.
An attorney may represent an educator before the local board of education or
charter governing body. The educator and the local board of education or charter
governing body may have counsel present at discussions prior to the final step.