0520-12-05-.05
Direct Allocations
Cite as Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 0520-12-05-.05
(1)
Direct Allocations. The amount set for Direct Allocations generated for each Student listed in
T.C.A. § 49-3-105(c), for the LEA in which the Student is a member, are subject to an annual
appropriation by the Tennessee General Assembly and shall be based on Students meeting
one (1) or more of the following criteria:
(a)
Rising Fourth Grade Students. A Direct Allocation amount is generated for a rising fourth
grade Student who is determined not to be proficient in English language arts (ELA)
based on the Student achieving a performance level rating of “below” or “approaching”
on the ELA portion of the Student’s most recent TCAP test.
(b)
Students Enrolled in Career and Technical Programs.
TENNESSEE INVESTMENT IN STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (TISA)
CHAPTER 0520-12-05
1.
Pursuant to T.C.A. § 49-3-105(c)(2), a Direct Allocation amount is generated for
each Student Membership in a Career and Technical Program based on:
(i)
The level of the program; and
(ii)
The Student progression in coursework through the program.
2.
Career and Technical Programs shall be designated into one (1) of three (3) levels.
Programs will be classified into the three (3) levels based on alignment to Wage-
Earning Potential indicators and additional resources required to support the
program if aligned to high Wage-Earning Potential occupational pathways.
(i)
The level of each program will be determined by the following methodology:
(I)
SOC Codes will be reviewed for alignment to each program.
I.
For each program, the Department will develop a list of aligned
careers in conjunction with stakeholder groups. The list of each
program will be based on the SOC codes.
II.
For each program’s list of aligned SOC codes, the SOC codes
with the top ten (10) highest employments in Tennessee will be
used in the scoring process outlined below in this Rule. If a
program’s list of aligned SOC codes is fewer than ten (10) SOC
codes, then the available SOC codes will be used for the
analysis outlined below in this Rule.
(II)
Programs will be scored using information on aligned SOC codes to
establish the Wage-Earning Potential for each program by analyzing
high-wage, high-demand, and high-skill data points. Each of the
analyses detailed below will begin with the list of up to ten (10) SOC
codes identified within each program as detailed above.
I.
High-wage score determination:
A.
Using occupational wage data provided by the Tennessee
Department of Labor and Workforce Development
(TDLWD), the Department will identify the top five (5)
median wage SOC codes within a program. If a program
has fewer than five (5) aligned SOC codes, then the
available SOC codes will be used for the purposes of this
determination.
B.
The median wages of the top (5) SOC codes will then be
averaged together to produce the average median-wage
of the program.
C.
The resulting average median wage for each program will
then be compared to the statewide median-wage. The
comparison will result in a score ranging from one (1) to
five (5) for the high-wage score based on the following:
(A)
Average median wages at or below the statewide
median will earn a score of one (1).
TENNESSEE INVESTMENT IN STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (TISA)
CHAPTER 0520-12-05
(B)
Average median wages above 100% to 120% of the
statewide median will earn a score of two (2).
(C)
Average median wages above 120% to 130% of the
statewide median will earn a score of three (3).
(D)
Average median wages above 130% to 140% of the
statewide median will earn a score of four (4).
(E)
Average median wages above 140% of the
statewide median will earn a score of five (5).
II.
High-demand score determination:
A.
Using employment projection data provided by the
TDLWD, the Department will identify the top five (5) in-
demand SOC codes within each program based on
regional prevalence of demand and volume of demand. If
a program has fewer than five (5) aligned SOC codes,
then the available SOC codes will be used for the
purposes of this determination.
B.
For each aligned SOC code, the in-demand indicator will
be based on the number of regions in which the SOC
code is identified as in-demand using the following
scores:
(A)
For a SOC code identified as in-demand in eight (8)
or nine (9) workforce development regions, the
SOC code will earn a score of four (4).
(B)
For a SOC code identified as in-demand in five (5)
to seven (7) workforce development regions, the
SOC code will earn a score of three (3).
(C)
For a SOC code identified as in-demand in three (3)
to four (4) workforce development regions, the SOC
code will earn a score of two (2).
(D)
For a SOC code identified as in-demand in two (2)
or fewer workforce development regions, the SOC
code will earn a score of one (1).
(E)
If a SOC code is projected to have annual openings
in the most recent employment projections of equal
to or more than one thousand (1,000), the SOC
code will earn a score of four (4) regardless of the
regional prevalence score determined in the above
paragraphs.
C.
The scores for the top five (5) in-demand SOC codes will
be averaged to generate the overall high-demand score
for the program, ranging from one (1) to four (4).
D.
If the sum total of annual openings projected by the most
recent employment projections for the five (5) top SOC
TENNESSEE INVESTMENT IN STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (TISA)
CHAPTER 0520-12-05
codes is equal to or more than three thousand (3,000),
then the program will score a four (4) for the high-demand
score.
III.
High-skill score determination:
A.
Using the same set of top five (5) SOC codes identified in
the high-wage score process and data provided by the
TDLWD, the Department will total the number of SOC
codes with a typical entry education level above a high
school diploma. If a program has fewer than five (5)
aligned SOC codes, then the available SOC codes will be
used for the purpose of this determination.
(A)
SOC codes with typical entry education levels
above a high school diploma (postsecondary non-
degree
award,
some
college,
no
degree,
associate’s degree, bachelor’s degree, master’s
degree, doctoral or professional degree) will
generate a score of one (1).
(B)
SOC codes with typical entry education levels at or
below a high school diploma (high school diploma
or equivalent or no formal educational credential)
will generate a score of zero (0).
B.
The program will generate an overall high-skill score
based on the sum of the identified SOC codes using the
following:
(A)
If the sum is five (5), the program generates a score
of two (2).
(B)
If the sum is three (3) to four (4), the program
generates a score of one (1).
(C)
If the sum is less than three (3), the program
generates a score of zero (0).
(III)
Weights and final program scores:
I.
To determine a final program score, the high-wage, high-
demand, and high-skill scores calculated above will be weighted
in the following methodology:
A.
High-wage will be weighted at 70%.
B.
High-demand will be weighted at 20%.
C.
High-skill will be weighted at 10%.
II.
The formula for final program score is (High-Wage Score x 0.7)
+ (High-Demand Score x 0.2) + (High-Skill Score x 0.1) = final
program score.
(IV) Tiers and additional resources:
TENNESSEE INVESTMENT IN STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (TISA)
CHAPTER 0520-12-05
I.
The final program scores will be divided into three (3) levels
based on the following methodology:
A.
Programs at or above the eightieth (80th) percentile of all
scores will be identified as Level 3.
B.
Program scores between the fortieth (40th) and eightieth
(80th) percentile of scores will be identified as Level 2.
C.
Program scores below the fortieth (40th) percentile of
scores will be identified as Level 1.
II.
Additional resources: The Department shall evaluate and
establish a list of high-cost programs to reflect the additional
resources needed to support the program. For programs
identified in the top ten percent (10%) of additional resources
needed, if the program falls into either Level 2 or Level 3, then
the Department will apply an additional level of funding for
student membership in these programs as identified in the
appropriations process.
3.
Student progression in coursework through a program shall be determined by each
course’s alignment as a first, second, third, or fourth year course of the career and
technical education program.
4.
Special Considerations - Career and Technical Program Levels.
(i)
If a course appears in multiple programs and the aligned programs represent
two (2) or more different levels as identified in Paragraph (b)(2) of this Rule,
then the course will be funded at the highest level of the aligned program.
(ii)
Career and Technical Program courses for elective credit and middle school
Career and Technical Program courses will be valued the same as a Student
assigned to the first year of a level one (1) Career and Technical Program.
Funding for general education courses that are part of a Career and
Technical Program will not be funded as part of the Career and Technical
Program.
5.
By July 1 of each year, the Department shall:
(i)
Create and publish a listing of all approved Career and Technical Program
courses and determine for each course whether it aligns with first, second,
third, or fourth year of the Career and Technical Program;
(ii)
Create and publish a listing of all approved Career and Technical Programs
by level;
(iii)
Conduct an annual review of Wage-Earning Potential indicators through
data from the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development
and other sources, for all occupations and ensure alignment to approved
Career and Technical Programs; and
(iv)
Conduct an annual review of additional resources required to support Career
and Technical Programs.
TENNESSEE INVESTMENT IN STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT (TISA)
CHAPTER 0520-12-05
6.
With the exception of the first year of implementation, program levels and course
assignment to progression years, while evaluated annually, will be updated for
TISA funding purposes every three (3) years to allow LEAs appropriate time to
align programs. This re-evaluation, including additional resources analysis, will be
released by July 1 on the three (3) year cycle and become effective for the
subsequent fiscal year, providing a full year between the release date and the year
in which data will drive updated funding implications.
(c)
Students Taking a Postsecondary Readiness Assessment. A Direct Allocation amount is
generated, which shall be maintained by the Department and used to fund the cost of
Postsecondary Readiness Assessments, for each Student meeting one (1) or more of
the following criteria:
1.
A junior or senior in high school, as determined from data from Education
Information System and the LEA, who has not previously taken a Postsecondary
Readiness Assessment; or
2.
A junior or senior in high school, as determined from data from Education
Information System and the LEA, who has previously taken a Postsecondary
Readiness Assessment, but only once.
(d)
Kindergarten-Grade 3 Students. A Direct Allocation amount is generated for each
member Student enrolled in any of the grades kindergarten through three (K-3) as
determined from data from Education Information System intended to support literacy
instruction; and
(e)
Public Charter School Students. A Direct Allocation amount is generated for each
member Student of a public charter school as reported by LEAs in the Student
information system. The Department shall calculate and disburse public charter school
Direct Allocations by:
1.
Dividing the total recurring funding appropriated by the Tennessee General
Assembly annually for this purpose by the prior year ADM in charter schools to
generate a per Student amount. The per Student amount is then multiplied by prior
year ADM at each public charter school to generate the total Direct Allocation
generated by individual public charter schools; and
2.
Allocating and distributing to the public charter school’s Authorizing Entity, the per
Student amount multiplied by prior year ADM generated by each of the authorizer’s
public charter schools. The authorizing LEA shall distribute these funds and other
state, local, and federal funds to public charter schools pursuant to State Board of
Education Rules, Division 0520-14 on Charter Schools.
(2)
The amount set for Direct Allocations generated for each Student listed in T.C.A. § 49-3-105(c)
shall be administered and allocated by the Department to the LEA in which the Student is a
member, or maintained by the Department as specified in subdivision (1)(c), based on data
collected for an LEA during the immediately preceding school year, in accordance with T.C.A.
§ 49-3-105(d).
(3)
The amount for each Direct Allocation shall be determined through the state budget and
appropriations process.