GA-0117
Whether a county jail inmate
Cite as Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. GA-0117
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
GREG
ABBOTT
October 22,2003
The Honorable William C. Bennett, Jr.
Criminal District Attorney
Madison County, Texas
101 West Main, Room 207
Madisonville,
Texas 77864
Opinion No. GA-01 17
Re:
Whether
a county jail inmate
may be
employed privately by county jail personnel
(RQ-0053-GA)
Dear Mr. Bennett:
You ask whether an inrnate sentenced to serve time in county jail, or sentenced
to the
Institutional
Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”) but “bench warranted”
to serve time in county jail, may be employed privately by county jail personnel.’
Your question concerns the employment
of an inmate sentenced to the Institutional Division
of TDCJ by a Madison County district court.
The inmate was transferred back to the Madison
County jail to serve his sentence as a trusty. The inmate volunteered
to launder jailers’ uniforms in
his spare time. The jailers pay the inmate a gratuity for this service, depositing between one and five
dollars in the inmate’s commissary
account.
The inmate launders the jailers’ uniforms using the
county’s washing machine, dryer, detergent, water, and iron.
At the request of the county sheriff and county auditor, you ask whether an inn-rate sentenced
to serve time in county jail, or sentenced to TDCJ confinement
but bench warranted to serve time
in county jail as a trusty, may render compensated
services to jailers. Request Letter, supra note 1,
at l-2. In particular, you inquire whether chapter 497 of the Texas Government
Code, concerning
Texas Correctional
Industries
(“TCI”), authorizes this practice.
Id. You acknowledge
that the
inmate’s informal laundry work would not comport with any of the formal requirements
of a TCI
program.
Nevertheless,
you suggest that the inmate’s informal employment
will provide the inmate
with suitable vocational
training and rehabilitation,
develop his work ethic, and provide for his
maintenance,
thereby serving the stated purposes of a TCI program.
See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.
5 497.002
(Vernon Supp. 2003) (stating purposes of TCI).
‘Letter from Honorable
William C. Bennett, Jr., Criminal District Attorney,
Madison
County, Texas, to the
Office of the Attorney
General, at 2 (Apr. 30,2003)
(on file with Opinion Committee)
[hereinafter Request Letter].
The Honorable William C. Bennett, Jr. - Page 2
(GA-01 17)
Chapter 497 provides the statutory authority to use TDCJ inmate labor in TCI and private
sector programs.
Id. 55 497.001-. 113 (Vernon 1998 & Supp. 2003).* TDCJ operates TCI programs
at suitable correctional
facilities.
Id. 8 497.002(b) (V emon Supp. 2003). Private sector programs
must operate under the rules promulgated
by the Private Sector Prison Oversight
Authority,
consistent with the standards of the federal prison enhancement
certification program of 18 U.S.C.
0 1761. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 80 497.051(a), .057 (Vernon 1998 & Supp. 2003); 18 U.S.C.
8 1761 (2002).
These chapter
497 work programs
are subject
to exacting
statutory
and
administrative
regulation,
such as the standards that govern inmate compensation.
See, e.g., TEX.
GOV’T
CODE ANN.
$5 497.004(a) (Vernon Supp. 2003) ( inmate pay scale requirements),
497.058
(payment of prevailing wages), 497.060 (workers compensation);
37 TEX. ADMIN. CODE 8 245.30
(2003) (distribution
of participant’s wages). Nothing in chapter 497 or related administrative
rules
recognizes
informal
work arrangements
such as you describe.
While an inmate’s
informal
employment
arguably could serve the stated purposes of chapter 497, it does not follow that such a
practice is statutorily authorized.
See Tijerina v. City of Tyler, 846 S.W.2d 825,827 (Tex. 1992) (a
court may not rewrite a plainly worded, unambiguous
statute on the ground that the statute is
insufficient
to effectuate sound public policy); Rylander v. Fisher Controls Int ‘I, Inc., 45 S. W.3d
291,299 (Tex. App.-Austin
2001, no pet.) (a court may not expand the scope of a statute based on
its own notions of public policy).
Chapter 497 cannot be construed to authorize employment
of
inmates outside of formal TCI and private sector programs.
The statutes establishing
formal work
programs for TDCJ inmates do not authorize informal inmate employment.
Like chapter 497, which governs TDCJ labor, the statutes that authorize work programs for
jail inmates do not sanction informal inmate employment.
Under the Code of Criminal Procedure,
persons sentenced to jail are expected to work in a county jail industries program or do manual labor
according to the terrns of article 43.10.
TEX. CODE GRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 43.10 (Vernon Supp.
2003). By statute, county jails must operate under minimum
standards promulgated
by the Texas
Commission
on Jail Standards.
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. 8 5 11.009(a)(1)-(3) (Vernon 1998) (duties
of Commission
to promulgate
standards); TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE ANN. 8 35 1.002 (Vernon 1999)
(requiring county jails to comply with minimum
standards).
The Commission
has promulgated
standards regulating the work assignments of county jail inrnates, such as the limitation on the hours
in an inmate’s workweek.
See 37 TEX. ADMIN. CODE 50 289.1-.5 (2003). None of these statutes and
administrative
rules sanction informal private inmate work arrangements.
2The Seventy-eighth
Legislature
amended chapter 497 of the Texas Government
Code, but those amendments
do not affect the subject matter of this opinion:
Act of May 16,2003,78th
Leg., R.S., ch. 818, 5 6.07,2003
Tex. Sess.
Law Serv. 2557,2566
(to be codified as an amendment
to TEX. GOV’TCODEANN. 9 497.094(b));
Act of May 282003,
78th Leg., R.S., H.B. 1372,$$ l-5 (to be codified as amendments
to TEX. GOV’TCODEANN. $5 497.024, .058, .0581(a),
.059, .062); Act of June 1,2003,78th
Leg., R.S., S.B. 287, $5 33.01-.02 (to be codified as amendments
to TEX. GOV’T
CODE ANN. $0 497.052(a),
.053).
The Honorable William C. Bennett, Jr. - Page 3
(GA-01 17)
SUMMARY
A county j ail inmate may not be employed privately by county
jail personnel.
BARRY R. MCBEE
First Assistant Attorney General
DON R. WILLETT
Deputy Attorney General for Legal Counsel
NANCY S. FULLER
Chair, Opinion Committee
William A. Hill
Assistant Attorney General, Opinion Committee