R156-26a-201
R156-26a-201. Advisory Peer Committees Created - Membership - Duties
Cite as Utah Admin. Code R156-26a-201
(1) There is created under Subsection 58-1-203(1)(f) the Education Advisory Committee to the Board that shall:
(a) consist of one full time faculty member from each college or university in Utah that has a nationally accredited or regionally accredited program, except the majority of these committee members shall be licensed CPAs;
(b) be appointed and serve under Section R156-1-205; and
(c) have the duty and responsibility to assist the Division in the Division's duties, functions, and responsibilities including:
(i) advising the Board on the acceptability of an educational institution including the institution's:
(A) accreditation;
(B) the acceptability by other state licensing boards;
(C) the faculty qualifications; and
(D) other educational resources;
(ii) assisting the Board to determine under Section R156-26a-306 if an applicant is qualified to sit for the AICPA Uniform CPA Examination; and
(iii) advising the Board regarding proposed rule changes.
(2) There is created under Subsection 58-1-203(1)(f) the Advisory Peer Review Program Committee to the Board that shall:
(a) consist of up to ten licensed CPAs;
(b) be appointed and serve under Section R156-1-205; and
(c) have the duty and responsibility to advise the Board on peer review matters including:
(i) reviewing the results of peer reviews by administering organizations; and
(ii) as the Advisory Peer Review Program Committee determines necessary, requiring corrective action of a firm that:
(A) has significant deficiencies noted in the peer review under Subsection R156-26a-201(2)(c)(i); and
(B) is in addition to any corrective actions required by the administering organization;
(iii) evaluating compliance of CPE programs;
(iv) performing random audits to determine compliance with the CPE requirements and the standards for CPE programs;
(v) reviewing complaints made to the Division and recommending whether certain acts, practices, or omissions violate the ethical standards of the profession;
(vi) providing technical assistance to the Division; and
(vii) serving as expert witnesses at administrative hearings.