W. Va. Op. Att'y Gen., See (Nov. 8, 2013)
Opinion of the Attorney General's Office Regarding the Collection of Unpaid Emergency Ambulance Service Fees (November 8, 2013)
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
MONTAINE
LIBERI
SEMPER
State of West Virginia
Office of the Attorney General
Patrick Morrisey
(304) 558-2021
Attorney General
Fax (304) 558-0410
November 8, 2013
The Honorable Lucas J. See
Prosecuting Attorney
Hardy County Prosecuting Attorney's Office
204 Washington St., Room 104
Moorefield, WV 26836
Dear Prosecutor See,
You have asked for an Opinion of the Attorney General regarding whether an emergency
ambulance authority can bring suit to collect unpaid emergency ambulance service fees. This
Opinion is being issued pursuant to West Virginia Code § 5-3-2, which provides that the
Attorney General "may consult with and advise the several prosecuting attorneys in matters
relating to the official duties of their office." Your September 25, 2013 letter to the Office of the
Attorney General raises the following legal question:
May an emergency ambulance authority created under the provisions of West
Virginia Code § 7-15-4 bring suit in Magistrate Court to collect unpaid
emergency ambulance fees imposed under the provisions of West Virginia Code
§ 7-15-17?
We conclude that an emergency ambulance authority does not have the statutory power to
collect special emergency ambulance fees imposed under West Virginia Code § 7-15-17.
Created by county commissions pursuant to statute, emergency ambulance authorities have
specific enumerated powers set forth in West Virginia Code § 7-15-10. Those powers include
the ability to: "provide emergency ambulance service"; "enter into contracts and agreements";
"sue and be sued"; and "do any and all things necessary or convenient to carry out the powers
given in this article." Id.
Thirty years ago, the Office of Attorney General determined that an emergency
ambulance authority may, pursuant to West Virginia Code § 7-15-10, "impose and collect fees
State Capitol Building 1, Room E-26, 1900 Kanawha Boulevard East, Charleston, WV 25305
Honorable Lucas J. See
November 8, 2013
Page 2
and charges upon users of their services for services rendered." 59 W. Va. Op. Att'y Gen. 161
(1982). Specifically, that earlier Opinion found that "the imposition of a charge upon the basis of
a minimum fee per transport, mileage charge, etc., for services actually rendered, would appear
to be in the [sic] conformity with the general powers of the authority set forth in Code 7-15-10."
Id. The Office reasoned that charging for actual services provided falls within an emergency
ambulance authority's express statutory power to "do any and all things necessary" to carry out
its power to "provide emergency ambulance service." Id.
Importantly, that 1982 Opinion distinguished fees for actual service from the special
emergency ambulance fees imposed under West Virginia Code § 7-15-17. The latter fees, about
which you have asked, may be imposed broadly even on those who have not actually used the
emergency ambulance service. See Clay Cnty. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Clay Cnty. Comm'n,
192 W. Va. 408, 452 S.E.2d 724 (1994) (upholding an emergency ambulance fee ordinance that
imposed a $25 annual fee upon "any bona fide owner or occupant of a living unit within the
geographic boundaries of Clay County, West Virginia"); 56 W. Va. Op. Att'y Gen. 308 (1976)
(reasoning that it would be inconsistent with the statute's purpose "if the service fee [permitted
by § 7-15-17] was to be collected only from those persons who actually made use of the
emergency ambulance service").
In the Opinion, the Office expressly declined to decide how the special emergency
ambulance fees may be imposed and collected, and who may do so. Referencing an even earlier
Opinion, the Office stressed that the Legislature had failed to "prescribe the mode by which
such fee is to be imposed." 59 W. Va. Op. Att'y Gen. 161 (quoting 56 W. Va. Op. Att'y Gen.
308). Rather than decide the question, the Office called for "legislative clarification" of "the
manner in which the special emergency ambulance fee, provided for by Code 7-15-17, is to be
imposed and collected." Id. Thirty years have passed without legislative clarification.
We now conclude, for several reasons, that an emergency ambulance authority lacks the
statutory power to collect the special emergency ambulance fees permitted by West Virginia
Code $ 7-15-17. First, we look to the plain text of the statute, which clearly contemplates that
the county commission-not an ambulance authority-is responsible for the special emergency
ambulance fees. The statute specifically grants "the county commission" the authority to impose
the special emergency ambulance fee and expressly requires that the fee be imposed "by
ordinance"-something that only the county commission can do. W. Va. Code § 7-15-17. It
also contemplates that an ambulance authority will "receivel funds from the special emergency
ambulance fees," which suggests that the authority will not collect the fees itself. Id. (emphasis
added). "[W]here the language of a statutory provision is plain, its terms should be applied as
written and not construed." DeVane V. Kennedy, 205 W.Va. 519, 529, 519 S.E.2d 622, 632
(1999).
Honorable Lucas J. See
November 8, 2013
Page 3
Second, we note that the Legislature specifically chose to separate the special emergency
ambulance fees in § 7-15-17 from an emergency ambulance authority's enumerated powers in
§ 7-15-10. "In the interpretation of statutory provisions the familiar maxim expressio unius est
exclusio alterius, the express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another, applies."
Syl. Pt. 3, Manchin v. Dunfee, 174 W. Va. 532, 327 S.E.2d 710 (1984). We cannot ignore that
the detailed list of enumerated powers in § 7-15-10-including such powers as an ambulance
authority's ability to "encumber or mortgage all or part of its facilities and equipment"-did not
cross-reference the power in § 7-15-17 to impose or collect the special emergency ambulance
fees.
Third, this conclusion is consistent with a county commission's constitutional duty to
superintend and manage a county's fiscal affairs. Article IX, Section 11 of the West Virginia
Constitution provides that county commissions "have the superintendence and administration of
the internal police and fiscal affairs of their counties." W. Va. Const. art. IX, § 11. The special
emergency ambulance fees fall squarely within a county's fiscal affairs, as those fees are
specifically intended to be "used to pay for, in whole or in part, the establishment, maintenance
and operation of [emergency ambulance] authorit[ies]." W. Va. Code § 7-15-17; see also 59 W.
Va. Op. Att'y Gen. 190 (1982) (explaining that "the control or management of the [ambulance]
authority is subordinate to the constitutional duty vested in the county commission to manage the
internal fiscal affairs of the county").
For all these reasons, we determine that a county commission-not an emergency
ambulance authority-has the statutory power to collect the special emergency ambulance fees
permitted by West Virginia Code § 7-15-17. It follows that an emergency ambulance authority
lacks the statutory power to bring suit in Magistrate Court to collect those fees. We have not
been asked and do not decide, however, whether a county commission could delegate its
statutory power to an emergency ambulance authority.
Sincerely,
PATNICK morrisy
Patrick Morrisey
Attorney General
Elbert Lin
Solicitor General
Derek A. Knopp
Assistant Attorney General