W. Va. Op. Att'y Gen., Manchin (Aug. 24, 2010)
Opinion of the Attorney General's Office Regarding the Special Primary Election to Be Held August 28, 2010 (August 24, 2010)
AG
STATE WEST
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 24 PM I: 37
DARRELL V. McGRAW, JR.
CHARLESTON 25305
(304) 558-2021
ATTORNEY GENERAL
FAX: (304) 558-0140
August 24, 2010
The Honorable Joe Manchin III
Governor
State Capitol
1900 Kanawha Boulevard, East
Charleston, West Virginia 25305
Dear Governor Manchin:
This office is in receipt of your request for an Opinion of the Attorney General relative to
the special primary election to be held on August 28, 2010. As you observe, the Legislature enacted
H.B. 201 (2010 2nd Ex. Sess.), codified at W. Va. Code § 30-10-4a, which directs the Governor to
proclaim a special primary and a special general election to elect a successor to the late Senator
Robert C. Byrd. The special primary election is to be held on August 28, 2010, W. Va. Code
§ 30-10-4a(b)(2)(A), which is a Saturday.
At the outset, we reiterate as we have previously recognized in issuing opinions "that the
question presented comes to us in the abstract. Inasmuch as we render opinions in the abstract
without memoranda or argument representing diverse points of view, we are constrained to approach
matters conservatively. Courts may construe facts and argument differently and apply them to the
law in a fashion not contemplated by an abstract opinion. Unless and until that occurs, however, our
formal opinion has the force and effect of law." 65 W. Va. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 16 (Jan. 11, 1994).
You pose three questions:
A.
Will Saturday, August 28, 2010, be a legal holiday for State employees?
B.
If Saturday, August 28, 2010, is a legal holiday for all State employees, will
it be observed the preceding Friday?
C.
If Saturday, August 28, 2010, is a legal holiday, will all State employees
receive credit for the holiday or just those scheduled to work on Saturday,
August 28, 2010?
Our short answers to your questions are that (1) Saturday, August 28, 2010, is a legal holiday
for State employees; (2) the Saturday, August 28, 2010, holiday is not transferred to Friday,
August 27, 2010; and (3) employees scheduled to work on Saturday, August 28, 2010, are entitled
August 24, 2010
Page 2
to three hours of paid leave time to vote as long as these employees properly request such time. We
now elaborate on our conclusions.
A.
Saturday, August 28, 2010, is a legal holiday for State employees.
"Legal holidays are generally created either by legislative enactments or by gubernatorial
or presidential proclamations authorized by general legislation." Syl. Pt. 1, Pullano v. City of
Bluefield, 176 W. Va. 198, 342 S.E.2d 164 (1986). The West Virginia Legislature has enacted West
Virginia Code § 2-2-1 that addresses the issue of legal holidays. Specifically, West Virginia Code
§ 2-2-1(a)(13) provides that "[a]ny day on which a general, primary or special election is held is a
holiday throughout the state, a political subdivision of the state, a district or an incorporated city,
town or village in which the election is conducted[.] "When a statute is clear and unambiguous and
the legislative intent is plain, the statute should not be interpreted by the courts, and in such case it
is the duty of the courts not to construe but to apply the statute." Syl. Pt. 5, State v. General Daniel
Morgan Post, 144 W. Va. 137, 107 S.E.2d 353 (1959). More succinctly, "[w]here the statutory
language is clear and unambiguous, it should be applied as written." State ex rel. Corp. of Charles
Town v. Sanders, 224 W. Va. 630, 633, 687 S.E.2d 568, 571 (2009) (per curiam). Applying the clear
and unambiguous language of West Virginia Code § 2-2-1(a)(13), we conclude that Saturday,
August 28, 2010, is a legal holiday in light of West Virginia Code § 30-10-4a(2)(A)'s designation
of that day as a special primary election day.
B.
Saturday, August 28, 2010, is the legal holiday and the holiday is not
transferred to the preceding Friday.
West Virginia Code § 2-2-1(b) provides a weekend transfer rule; that is, if a legal holiday
falls on a Saturday, the holiday is transferred to the preceding Friday, and if the holiday falls on a
Sunday, the following Monday becomes the holiday. This transfer, though, does not apply the
"subdivision (13), subsection (a)" of West Virginia Code § 2-2-1. Subsection a of subdivision
thirteen (13) of West Virginia Code § 2-2-1 is the subsection that creates special election days as
legal holidays.
We are compelled to observe here that the Division of Personnel Administrative Rule dealing
with holidays and implementing West Virginia Code § 2-2-1 does not contain language exempting
election days from the weekend transfer rule. See W. Va. C.S.R. § 143-1-14 (2007). In dealing with
legislative rules, the Supreme Court of Appeals has held "[t]he court first must ask whether the
Legislature has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intention of the Legislature is
clear, that is the end of the matter, and the agency's position only can be upheld if it conforms to the
Legislature's intent." Syl. Pt. 3, in part, Appalachian Power Co. V. State Tax Dep 't, 195 W. Va. 573,
466 S.E.2d 424 (1995). Only recently the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has explained
that a legislative rule cannot trump the legislative intent embodied in a clear and unambiguous
statute. "[A] rule must always submit to the legislative intent expressed in the controlling or
substantive statute which the rule is promulgated to implement." Harrison V. Commissioner,
August 24, 2010
Page 3
No. 34970, slip op. at 13 (W. Va. June 3, 2010). Thus, the absence of the weekend transfer rule in
the Code of State Rules is of no moment here since the controlling authority is the statute not the
administrative rule.
The clear and unambiguous language of West Virginia Code § 2-2-1 in light of West Virginia
Code § 30-10-4a, leads to the unassailable conclusion that the special primary election holiday of
Saturday, August 28, 2010, is not transferred to the preceding Friday.
C.
On an election day, State employees who are working are entitled to
"ample and convenient time and opportunity" to vote.
Because the special primary election to replace Senator Byrd will occur on a Saturday, most
State employees will not be working and they will simply be unaffected because, as to them, the
Saturday has no real significance. For those that are working, however, the Division of Personnel
has implemented a legislative rule to protect the employees' fundamental, constitutional right to
vote. Bartlett V. Strickland, 129 S. Ct. 1231, 1240 (2009) (plurality opinion) (observing that "the
right to vote [is] one of the most fundamental rights of our citizens.").
An appointing authority¹ shall, if necessary, allow any employee required to work
on any election day ample and convenient time and opportunity to cast his or her
vote. Upon receipt of a written request at least three work days prior to an election,
an appointing authority shall give any employee who has less than three hours of
time away from work during hours polling places are open, up to three hours of paid
time off between the opening and closing of the polls, to vote. The appointing
'An "appointing authority" is "a person or group of persons authorized by an agency to make
appointments to positions in the classified or classified-exempt service." W. Va. Code § 29-6-2(c).
See also W. Va. C.S.R. § 143-1-3.8 (2007) ("Appointing Authority: The executive or administrative
head of an agency who is authorized by statute to appoint employees in the classified or classified-
exempt service. By written notification to the Director of Personnel, the appointing authority may
delegate specific powers authorized by this rule to persons who satisfy the definition of employee
as established in this rule.").
August 24, 2010
Page 4
authority shall schedule such time off to avoid impairment or disruption of essential
services and operations.
W. Va. C.S.R. § 143-1-14.1(f) (2007) (footnote added).² We observe that this section uses the word
"shall," which is generally mandatory. Syl. Pt. 1, Nelson v. West Virginia Public Employees Ins.
Bd., 171 W. Va. 445, 300 S.E.2d 86 (1982); Syl. Pt. 2, Terry v. Sencindiver, 153 W. Va. 651, 171
S.E.2d 480 (1969). 3 The appointing authority is obligated, therefore, to provide to an employee who
must work on Saturday, August 28, 2010, up to three hours of paid time off between the opening and
closing of the polls, to vote as long as the employee (1) has less than three hours of time away from
work when the polls are open; (2) asks for time off to vote; (3) in writing; (4) to the appointing
authority or the appointing authority's designate; (5) within three working days before the election.
In summary, we conclude that (1) Saturday, August 28, 2010, is a legal holiday for State
employees; (2) the Saturday, August 28, 2010, holiday is not transferred to Friday, August 27, 2010;
and (3) employees scheduled to work on Saturday, August 28, 2010, are entitled to three hours of
paid leave time to vote if they satisfy the procedural criteria spelled out in West Virginia C.S.R.
§ 143-1-14.1(f) (2007).
Thank you for the opportunity to render an opinion on this matter.
Very truly yours,
DARRELL V. McGRAW, JR.
ATTORNEY GENERAL
By
Assistant
SCOTT E. JOHNSON
²Because the Legislature has not spoken to the precise process to implement a State
employee's right to vote on an election day on which the employee must work, any Division of
Personnel Legislative Rule which implements this process in a reasonable manner should be upheld.
See Appalachian Power Co., 195 W. Va. at 590, 466 S.E.2d at 441 (citations and footnote omitted)
(observing that if a statute is not clear or is ambiguous a court "must examine the defendants'
interpretation to see how it relates to the statute and to determine whether the defendants'
interpretation
is reasonable
this examination involves a high degree of respect for the
[agency's] role."). We believe the three-hour rule and its attendant procedural requirements are
reasonable.
Statutes and administrative rules are governed by identical rules of construction Snider v.
Fox, 218 W. Va. 663, 667, 627 S.E.2d 353, 357 (2006).