Rule 24. Trial Jurors

(a) Qualifications. — All prospective jurors must answer as to their quali- fications to be jurors; such answers shall be in writing, signed under penalty of perjury and filed with the clerk of the court. The written responses of the prospective jurors shall be preserved by the clerk of the court for the longer of the following: (1) One year after the end of the jury term; or (2) Until all appeals from any trial held during that term of court have been finally resolved. The judge shall inquire of the jurors in open court on the record to insure that they are qualified. (b) Excused jurors. — For a good cause but within statutory limits a judge may excuse a juror for a trial, for a fixed period of time, or for the term. All excuses shall be written and filed with the clerk or granted in open court on the record. (c) Examination of jurors. — After the jury panel is qualified the attorneys or a pro se defendant shall be entitled to conduct the examination of prospective jurors, but such examination shall be under the supervision and control of the judge, and the judge may conduct such further examination as the judge deems proper. The judge may assume the examination if counsel or a pro se defendant fail to follow this rule. If the judge assumes the examination, the judge may permit counsel or a pro se defendant to submit questions in writing. The examination shall be on the record. (1) The only purpose of the examination is to select a panel of jurors who will fairly and impartially hear the evidence and render a just verdict. (2) The court shall not permit counsel or a pro se defendant to attempt to precondition prospective jurors to a particular result, comment on the personal lives and families of the parties or their attorneys, nor question jurors concerning the pleadings, the law, the meaning of words, or the comfort of jurors. (3) In voir dire examination counsel or a pro se defendant shall not: (A) Ask questions of an individual juror that can be asked of the panel or a group of jurors collectively; (B) Ask questions answered in a juror questionnaire except to explain an answer; (C) Repeat a question asked and answered; (D) Instruct the jury on the law or argue the case; or (E) Ask a juror what the juror’s verdict might be under any hypothetical circumstance. Notwithstanding the restrictions set forth in subsections 24(c)(3)(A)-(E), counsel or a pro se party shall be permitted during voir dire examination to preview portions of the evidence from the case in a non-argumentative manner when a preview of the evidence would help prospective jurors better understand the context and reasons for certain lines of voir dire questioning. (d) Peremptory challenges. — (1) Felony Cases. — If the offense charged is punishable by death, each defendant is entitled to 12 peremptory challenges. If the offense charged is punishable by imprisonment for more than one year, each defendant is entitled to eight peremptory challenges. If two or more defendants are being tried jointly, each defendant shall be allowed separate peremptory challenges. The state shall be allowed the same number of peremptory challenges as the total of peremptory challenges permitted all defendants. (2) Misdemeanor Cases. — If the offense charged is punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year, each defendant is entitled to four peremptory challenges. In juvenile delinquency cases, each juvenile is entitled to four peremptory challenges. The state shall be allowed the same number of peremptory challenges as the total of peremptory challenges permitted all defendants. (e) Alternate jurors. — The court may direct that not more than six jurors in addition to the regular jury be called and impaneled to sit as alternate jurors. Alternate jurors in the order in which they are called shall replace jurors who, prior to the time the jury retires to consider its verdict, become or are found to be unable or disqualified to perform their duties. Alternate jurors shall be drawn in the same manner, shall have the same qualifications, shall be subject to the same examination and challenges, shall take the same oath and shall have the same functions, powers, facilities and privileges as the regular jurors. An alternate juror who does not replace a regular juror may be discharged or retained after the jury retires to consider its verdict. When the jury retires to consider the verdict, the court in its discretion may retain the alternate jurors during deliberations. If an alternate replaces a juror after deliberations have begun, the court shall instruct the jury to begin its deliberations anew. The trial court must: (1) instruct any retained alternate that his oath is still applicable and until a verdict has been rendered and the regular jury discharged, he must refrain from discussing the case with anyone and avoid extrinsic information that may affect his ability to impartially judge the case; (2) upon recall, inquire on the record whether the alternate juror did, in fact, comply with the court’s instructions; (3) instruct the reconstituted jury to begin deliberations anew; and (4) inquire on the record whether the remaining members of the original jury can ignore the previous deliberations and set aside any opinions formed during them. If the trial court cannot establish that all of these safeguards are met, then the court may not substitute the alternate, and the matter may proceed pursuant to W.R.Cr.P. 23(b); otherwise, a mistrial may be declared. Each side is entitled to one peremptory challenge in addition to those otherwise allowed by law if one or two alternate jurors are to be impaneled, two peremptory challenges if three or four alternate jurors are to be impaneled, and three peremptory challenges if five or six alternate jurors are to be impaneled. The additional peremptory challenges may be used against an alternate juror only, and the other peremptory challenges allowed by these rules may not be used against an alternate juror.