1979-0198
Alabama Attorney General Opinion 1979-0198
Cite as Ala. A.G. Opinion No. 1979-0198
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
'79- 00 /92
LEE L. HALE
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
WILLIAM 141.41EKURS. JR.
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT
S. TURNER
CHIEF ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
JANIE NOBLES
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
CHARLES A. GRADDICK
ATTORNEY GENERAL
STATE OF ALABAMA
MAY 16 1979
ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING.
44 NORTH UNION STREET
MONTGOMERY.
36130
(205) 832-5600
HERBERT I. BURSON, JR.
B. FRANK LOEB
PHILIP C. DAVIS
RON BOWDEN
JOHN J. BRECKENRIDGE
WILLIAM L. THOMPSON
Assistant Attorneys General
Revenue Department
W. P. (Ted) Farrar
Tax Assessor, Russell County
Room 108 Russell County Courthouse
Phenix City, Alabama 36867
Ad Valorem Tax - Tax Assessors
Cost to tax assessors office occassioned by
compliance with Amendment 373, Constitution
of Alabama 1901, may not be apportioned among
tax receiving entities.
Dear Mr. Farrar:
In your request for an opinion dated April 11, 1979, you ask whether the extra
cost for personnel, for programming in of new values and ratios, for new forms
to replace the ones already printed for 1979, and for equipment rental
occassioned by the adoption of Amendment 373, Constitution of Alabama 1901,
could be prorated among the -various agencies which receive ad valorem tax
money.
Your question is answered in the negative. Neither Amendment 373 nor any
statutory provisions passed as a consequence thereof provide for the proration
of the costs occassioned to the tax assessors office by the implementation of
said Amendment. It must therefore be assumed that the Legislature intended
for the tax assessors of this State to implement the provisions of Amendment
373 as a normal duty of the tax assessors office, to be paid for out of the
regular operating funds of said office.
Section 9 of Act 160, Third Special Session, 1971 Legislature (§40-7-68, Code
of Alabama 1975) which provides for the proration of the costs of the reval-
uation program and the maintenance of the equalized values established thereby
-2-
would not apply to costs incurred by the tax assessors office as a consequence
of compliance with Amendment 373, since Amendment 373 is not a part of the
revaluation program or its maintenance.
Sincerely,
CHARLES A. GRADDICK
Attorney General
By-
RON BOWDEN
Assistant Attorney General
RB/mr