85-169

Is there any provision for an attorney for a public board or commission to attend an executive session of that board or commission? Can an evidentiary hearing for a public employee in a dismissal case be held in executive session under the FOIA? Can an attorney for a fired public employee be allow

Year: 1985Length: 655 wordsOfficial source

Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 85-169

[ .. STEVE CLARK ATTORNEY GENERAL ae STATE OF ARKANSAS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201 July 30, 1985 OPINION NO. 85-169 The Honorable Doug Wood State Representative 215 N. Claremont Sherwood, Arkansas 72116 Dear Representative Wood: Under date of July 26, 1985 you have written to seek answers to several questions flowing from recent events at Southern Arkansas University that involved Act 93 of 1967, the Freedom of Information Law. You has asked the following: 1. Is there any provision for an attorney for a public board or commission to attend an executive session of that board or com- mission? The answer is "no". In Laman v. McCord, 245 Ark. 401, 432 S.W.2d 753 (1968) the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled that "There exists no provision of the law that specifically exempts meetings between a city council and the city attorney from coverage of the - Freedom of Information Act." It is my opinion that this ruling would also apply to the situation at hand regarding the SAU Board. 2. Can an evidentiary hearing for a public employee in a dismis- sal case be held in executive session under the provisions of the state. Freedom of Information Act? The answer is "no". In Arkansas State Police Commission v. Davidson, 253 Ark. 1090, 490 S.W.2d 788 (1973) the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled that when the State Police Commission con- ducts a hearing on the application for reinstatement of a dis- charged state policeman, the Freedom of Information Act requires that the taking of testimony and hearing of arguments be held in public. At the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing the Commis- sion may go into executive session to discuss the decision they should reach. It is my opinion that this same procedure could have been followed by the SAU Board. (501) 371-2007 The Honsrable Doug Wood -' July 30, 1985 Page 2 3. Can an attorney for a fired public employee be allowed in an executive session of the public board or commission reviewing the firing? The answer is "no". Section 12-2805 of Act 93 of 1967 states: "Executive sessions will be permitted only for the purpose of considering employment, appointment, promotion, demotion, dis- ciplining or resignation of any public officer or employee. (a) Only the person holding the top administrative position in the public agency department, or office involved: the immediate supervisor of the employee involved; and the employee may be present at the executive session when so requested by the gov- erning body, board, commission or other public body holding the executive session." It is clear from this language, as well as the Supreme Court decision, cited above, that no allowances have been made for attorneys to attend executive sessions of public bodies. 4. Is the constitutional right of due process or any other consti- tutional right of a fired employee violated if attorneys cannot be present in an executive session of the public board or commission reviewing the firing? The answer is "no". The avenue of due process is still open to a fired employee through the courts. However, see, generally, Bishop v. Wood, 326 U.S. 341 (1977); Seal v. Pryor, 670 F.2d 96 (8th Cir. 1982); Pollock v. Baxter Manor Nursing Home, 716 F.2d 545 (8th Cir. 1983). 5. Is there any provision under the state law for a public board or commission to appoint a non-member to a board or commission? The answer is "no". I have found no statute that would allow a_ public board or commission to take such action. 6. Is there any provision under state law for a public board or commission to appoint a non-member to serve as a temporary chairman for a specific part of a meeting? The answer is "no", JI am unaware of any state law that specif- ically allows for the procedure described. I trust this information will be of value to you. ’ Sincerely, Attorney |General JSC:RP:ble