85-100
FOIA/Access to documents of the County Judge. Does a justice of the peace have the same access to any documents of the county judge? Yes. If a private company has applied for public dollars and receives these monies does the public have a right to review their application? Wh
Cite as Ark. Op. Att'y Gen. 85-100
STATE OF ARKANSAS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
JUSTICE BUILDING, LITTLE ROCK 72201
STEVE CLARK (501) 371-2007
ATTORNEY GENERAL :
OPINION NO. 85-100
April-81985
“See
The Honorable Jerry Jewell
State Senator
1813 Pulaski Street
Little Rock, Arkansas 72206
Dear Senator Jewell:
Under date of February 21, 1985 you have written to request a formal
Attorney General's opinion on three questions. I am pleased to comply
with your request with the following judgments. You have asked:
1. If I, as a Justice of the Peace, a part of the Legislative
branch of County Government, have the same access to any
documents as the County Judge?
The answer to this question is "yes", as to any documents which
are kept in the normal course of business. Under Act 742 of 1977,
the enabling legislation that put into force Amendment 55 to the Ar-
kansas Constitution, the Quorum Court, which is composed of elected
Justices of the Peace, was given separate but co-equal status with the
County Judge, who serves as the county administrator. Section (7) of
Arkansas Statute §17-4002 reads as follows: "Legislative Affairs. All
legislative affairs of a Quorum Court shall be conducted through the
passage of ordinances, resolutions or motions." It is my judgment that
it would be difficult for a Quorum Court to act if it is denied access to -
needed information.
2. Ifa private Company that has applied for Public dollars
(grant) and receive these monies, does the Public have the right
to review their application? Which may or may not include per-
sonal and/or financial statements?
The answer to this question is also "yes". Act 93 of 1967, as
amended, The Freedom of Information Act, defines Public Records as
follows: "Public Records are writings, recorded sounds, films, tapes,
or data compilations in any form (a) required by law to be kept, or
(b) otherwise kept and which constitute a record of the performance
or lack of performance of official functions which are or should “be
carried out by a public official or employee, a governmental agency or
any other agency wholly or partially supported by public funds or
expending public funds."
‘ NO
The, Hoxcrable’ Jerry Jewell
Aprit’8, 1985
Page 2
It is my judgment that this definition means that when a private
company solicits public money, they do so at the expense of public
scrutiny. ;
Although the Freedom of Information Act contains two exceptions
to the full disclosure of open public records that possibly could be
construed _to_fit_the situation at hand, I do not believe they are ger-
mane in this instance.
3. It has been said that some information as it relates to grant
applications may be privileged. Is there ever a time where if the
information is indeed privileged, that the Quorum Court cannot
have access to this information? Why?
I am not aware of any Arkansas Statutes that would preclude
grant applications from the Freedom of Information Act.
Sincerely,
STEV iygtuek
Attorney General
SC:ble